Mark K wrote:
Lumping this season’s data into LaVine’s total career, which is so contextually different, makes this entire discussion very...weird.
Are we really going to sit here and say the Bulls are better with LaVine off the floor?
Are we really going to say that the Bulls’ offense rating when LaVine sits would carry over to all the minutes he plays if you simply benched him?
As I said I like advanced stats and use them often but in the case they’re being widely misused, either against his previous four seasons or making decisions on his worth this season.
Forgive me Johnny, but I can’t help but to question the root source of this position you’re taking. You’ve been very vocal about how bad LaVine has been in the past, so I’m not entirely surprised you’ve taken this angle now.
When the injured guys return and the Bulls are playing well and he’s still a -10, then these numbers will mean something. Until then, I don’t give a **** if the Bulls are a negative with him off the floor, and I sure as **** do not buy anything that suggests LaVine off the floor and replaced with Blakeney or Hutchison at SG for the 40 minutes a night he plays makes this team better.
It doesn’t.
You posted this in the thread that was locked, so I'll just respond here.
ONCE AGAIN, what I'm saying is that so far this season, Lavine has very similar impact numbers to the previous four years of his career Four seasons. Not one. Not two... FOUR. Whether you, or anyone else feels that it's not relevant doesn't matter. The facts are the facts.
All I'm saying it's that it's alarming that his on/off is this horrible considering the Bulls have so many players out and the replacement level guys that are subbing in for him are not that good. It makes it even worse, IMO. He started this season off on FIRE. His FG%, his TS%, his PER, everything has dropped like a rock.
In Zach's first 6 games, his FG% was over .500 (.510), he shot .380 from 3 pt., his TS% was something like .700. Fantastic.
His last 6 games guess what he's done? He's shooting .376 from the field. He's shooting .256 from 3 pt. His TS% is .498. His 41 pt outburst, high efficiency, high volume, 14 FTA game is INCLUDED in these numbers for the last 6 games and they are still combined to be what they are above. Not good at all.
So, he's had a run here in November so far where he has dropped like a rock. It's not a game, or two games, it's SIX GAMES.
YES, it matters. All of his stats for the season have gravitated to be right near his career numbers, with higher volume so his PPG are up significantly.
His impact is eerily similar to what he's done for the 6600+ previous minutes of his career. Sure it's only 510 minutes and he is being focused on heavily by the opposing defense. All that attention should be good for the rest of the team. Leave any NBA player WIDE OPEN and he should be able to make a layup of a wide open J. IF he gets the ball.
I'm not saying that he can't turn things back around. He can. I'm not saying that we need to trade him this week. I AM saying that if this continues for the next couple of months that we need to explore options. Trade options. Sell high options. I'm pretty sure he is going to maintain a very high PPG. His raw counting stats should all remain high, especially if he continues to get to the line at a high rate.
Here's what concerns me the most. Everybody keeps saying how when Dunn and Lauri come back, everything is just going to be great. The problem is that Zach and Dunn have a history together and they have not been good together. In fact, their chemistry on the basketball floor has been like oil and water. Add Lauri to the mix and it was even worse. Maybe things will be different this season. Maybe it won't. We need to be prepared for either situation because if Dunn and Zach and Lauri don't play well together when those guys get back then we definitely have a problem.
I don't know what is going to happen and neither does anybody else here. What I do know is that Lavine has been pretty bad over the last six games which is over 240 minutes of NBA basketball. He wasn't even getting to the line that much for 5 of the last 7 games. Last night he did get to the line a lot, but he was overall horrible in that game.
Bottom line, for whatever reason, the fact are that the Bulls overall this season have been better without Zach on the floor. IN FACT, they have a positive point differential with him on the bench. Whether it's because of garbage time, or whether it's because of the opposition not fielding good bench units against us... whether it's because of Zach's teammates, I don't know. It's just the way the numbers are right now. He is a net negative -10.2. I hope this changes for the better. IT HAS TO. If it doesn't, the Bulls have a big problem. An $80M problem that needs to be dealt with.
People on this board can flame me all they want. They can come up with every reason. Just take a look at the last six games and tell me that we can accept that play from Lavine long term.. whether he is being the focal point of defenses or not. Whether his teammates suck so bad that it is affecting Lavine's numbers o much that he is a sub .390 shooter from the field and a sub .260 shooter from 3 pt. and he carries a TS% of .498. He needs to start finding these teammates if he's being constantly double or triple teamed. That is what stars do. That is what the best players do when they are focused on defensively. They find WIDE OPEN teammates. Because ANY NBA player can make a wide open layup or a wide open mid range J and there are plenty who can hit WIDE OPEN 3 pt. shots. They just need to get the ball when they are open. That is Zach's job. He also needs to stop turning the ball over, especially in crunch time, late in games and when he drives to the basket. The Bulls as a team turn the ball over 4 times less per 100 without Zach. That is a lot of possessions and add up to a lot of points.
I wanted to eat crow about Lavine. I was ready to. Then just as I was about to take a bite, Zach came by and yanked the bird from my jaws. I want to eat that crow for the Bulls sake I do. He has been ass for the month of November other than his 41 pt game... because even with that monster game in the numbers for the last six games, his numbers are still horrible. Beyond horrible. That has to change. People can come up with every excuse in the World for it, but I don't care, it still has to change. I don't want excuses, I want to win games. I want results.