keloms wrote:Mech Engineer wrote:keloms wrote:You've got an owner with 70's & 80's business mindset and management and all successors that learned working under and with him so it's never going to change.
There is no legacy here, there is no championship environment or culture to live up to. The only two periods of success this organization had was landing two draft picks that worked out unbelievably great. Had it not been for lucking into them, this organization is no different than the Orlando Magic or Memphis Grizzlies.
Not to make it about the Bulls but looking at the Nets, what they have done is really amazing even if they never get beyond an ECF berth. It will be really interesting to compare their future with what Boston will do. Boston got all those picks and was the darling of everyone but not being opportunistic in selling those picks at the right time has caused them to not achieve their lofty goals.
The Nets have done a fabulous job and using those expiring contracts, player development to get a 6th seed without almost any top picks of their own is commendable. A good GM can use multiple tools but also do it well. The Bulls also hired that PhD lady in nutrition(Jenn Swann) and she failed miserably. It is the ability to not just pick players in a draft but the leadership/innovation/diligence in other areas which can also impact the team.
Assets are only good if they get used based on potential value because realized values, more often than not, are significantly less.
Brooklyn sold on potential, whereas when the Bulls sell or use the asset after it's been realized on actual value because they overvalue things and that's what's going to happen with the C / B level core that everyone is hoping that is magically going to become something. By the time they make a move in a year or two, it's sink or swim with no room for error. By the end of summer 2021, either Lauri flops and they don't have to give him a big deal or they're capped out regardless of whether they land a star or not because all those rookie deals start ending and it's back to being on a capped out on the treadmill drafting the 'rebuild 2025' plan.
Boston sold on potential with the Nets pick last year and look like they might have something with Tatum, but, everything else looks like it will essentially be watered down into very little because they fell into the trap too of hanging on way too long. They could've easily gotten Butler, PG, maybe even Kawhi, but, instead it's wasted mid-late firsts that they wont even have room for when it comes time.
Yeah, the Bulls did the same with the Charlotte pick ....they thought it will turn into a top 5 pick and kept it. But, if they had sold the pick to another GM who would have fallen for the possibility of it being a top 5 pick, they could have got a great return. They just waited too long and not to mention, they eventually wasted that pick to trade-up for McDermott.
Honestly, I fear the same for Lauri. He has been injured a lot and a 3 pt shooting PF who is not great on defense is pretty common nowadays. But, Lauri has that extra sweet stroke of the 3 pt shot for a PF/big that has held up his value a little more. But, if he doesn't improve, his value will be a lot, lot less. I hope I am wrong but that's a high possibility. Look at what happened to Niko.
And, as you wrote, it is the same with Boston. Those assets lost value in perception. It is like selling a stock. If you wait for it to reach its peak, you probably will never time it. You should have some analysis when it is a lot more than what you bought for and sell it to get great value.