johnnyvann840 wrote:I agree that GarPax had a terrific run in the draft. I have never denied that the Bulls drafted well over the tenure of this regime. It's just everything else that have been deficient in. Player/coach relations, trading, free agency.
Neither free agency or trading has really been a deficit. They have hit solid singles in both pretty consistent in both. Looking at their trades, I think every single one of their trades has aged well or was garbage for garbage except the McDermott trade (discounting Tyrus/Aldridge as that was more of a draft pick with a trade to just add a couple assets and then they took the guy they wanted anyway).
Curry trade was amazing
Trading 2005 #21 for 2004 #7 was amazing
Trading Noc for Miller was good
Trading Johnson, Thabo, Tyrus for 1st rounders was good
Butler trade looks good to me (though I will acknowledge some argument over it)
Overall, they've done very well trading, probably B to B+ grade on trades. The counter argument is equivalent to trying to prove a negative. You think they should have won their trades by even bigger margins, but on aggregate, they are vastly, vastly ahead in terms of what they got vs what they gave in trades.
FA is more of a mixed bag, but isn't as awful as people act like it is:
Boozer, Wade, Wallace, and Felicio are the misses. Wade was on a 2 year contract, and we knew we were limiting risk and paying more for it by doing 2 years. Felicio was inexplicably bad. Wallace/Boozer didn't work out great in the long run but both were viewed as signings that would help in the short run and both did (though we would have hoped the short run was at least 1 year longer in both cases).
Their margin FA signings were generally good: Korver, Brewer, CJ, Robinson, Nocioni, MDJ, Pau etc...
Again, no home runs, but overall their record there is probably C+/B- level given they attracted some very good players.