ThreeMileAllan wrote:AKfanatic wrote:HomoSapien wrote:
We'll sticky it closer to the 19th.
Ron Harper was one of my favorite players on that team. Regularly underappreciated. He was sort of like a mix of Andre Igoudala and Shaun Livingston on the Warriors.
Rewatching old games has also given me a new appreciation for Luc Longley. He really used to annoy me back in the day, but he's much more skilled than I gave him credit for. And also a shout out to Scott Burrell who was a hell of a role player on that 98 team but has almost totally been forgotten.
Before Harper’s knee injury, he was poised to be an all time great. How well he played after a serious knee injury was a testament to how good he was. I remember the stories of Cavs management starting rumors of drug use and partying before trading him to the Clips... I know at the time Harper was heated, dude was from Dayton and wanted to be a Cav for life.
He was such an underrated part of the Bulls. Always seems left out.. it’d MJ, Pip, the Worm, the Waiter, and Pax, or Kerr most often remembered. But Harp gave the Bulls such a great dimension. His savvy, size, and length gave the Bulls a great advantage next to Pip and MJ. Loved Harp.
Scott Burrell had some great moments also.
Bison Dele (RIP) was such a fun signing. Really loved when he was with the Bulls.
Man every five years or so I think about Bison Dele, how cool it was to have such a skilled bruiser on our team. And I go down the Google hole of him going missing on the boat. Rip Bison
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I'm the exact same way. He was a really good player. Everyone always says the 96 Bulls team is the greatest of all time, but I actually felt like the 97 Bulls were stronger and it's because of him (Jason Caffey and Randy Brown also grew into reliable role players that year).
I imagine that had the Bulls been able to keep Brian Williams, all that noise about them being on their last legs (a notion I strongly disagree with) or being too small to beat the Spurs would have gone away. Williams was a near All-Star caliber player at his best.
One more thing about Burrell, I always felt like there wasn't much difference between him and Byron Russell. I think if we brought the team back in 99, his role would have expanded and he would have made us better. His PER 36 numbers that year are pretty impressive:
Scott Burrell: 13.7 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 2.1 apg, 2.1 spg, 1.2 bpg. He was also a very good three-point shooter by those days' standards.