TheSuzerain wrote:MrSparkle wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:They'll be able to flip George Hill for another pick.
Presti is incredible and he's making AK look bad.
I couldn’t think of more opposite situations.
OKC just overachieved with a cast of veterans. Of course the smart move was to sell high on all the aging vets.
I do agree he’s done great with these trades. The number of FRPs is wild. But he’s simply selling high. There is no one for the Bulls to sell high, and even Zach has a funky reputation on the trade market.
Zach has more value than anyone Presti traded.
AK hasn't even traded for a measly future 2nd rounder.
This **** roster is not going to be fixed through inaction.
But how can you know what action needs to be taken? Sentiment throughout the league is that the Bulls have good, but underachieving talent. As an executive, you know you're coming into a situation where there was inadequate coaching and player development. Your team is also coming off of a 9 month layoff, during which so much could have changed, for better or worse regarding development. Look at how things changed in just a few months for the Suns, Heat and Nuggets.
On top of all of that, you're also adding the #4 pick.
Why make any rash decisions, with so many variables, when you're so close to being able to evaluate your players, and whole team, in real NBA games? NBA preseason literally starts in 3 weeks. What if Coby or Zach have developed their playmaking skills? You can guess.... you can even make a good guess, but you don't know. However, you will know in just a few short weeks, so why not just be patient? You're not winning the title this season, so play the long game.
Now, if a good deal pops up for Sato or Thad that brings back a playmaker you really covet, go for it. The Bulls shouldn't just make a deal to make one though, especially when both Sato and Thad are probably just as good, if not better, than anything you're going to get in return for them. It's not like neither one fits with this Bulls team. They both do.