LateNight wrote:MrSparkle wrote:Does it have to be a trade? Cause they signed 35yo all-stars in Pau and Wade. And nobody was really happy with the results 1-2 years later.
I liked the Pau Gasol signing. He took less money and, while he wasn't great on defense, had some great plays. He got the game-winner for us a couple times. That was not a bad move given the state of the team and the perceived (and later actualized) window.
Having said that - the Pau move was not particularly relevant here. Trading assets to get CP3 is a very different move - not sure I love the idea of giving up future picks to get an aging PG on a bad contract (although CP3 torched us last December).
I liked Pau too. The problem was that he ended up being our 2nd best player, when he was supposed to be our 4th or 5th option.
Similarly, we’re gonna have a problem if CP3 is the 1st or 2nd best player. He’s not gonna shoulder the load well. OKC was heavily loaded with defenders and veterans, so Paul could play the way he liked to play.
Pau would’ve been a success on that 14-16 team if Rose, Niko, Doug, Kirk, and Noah hadn’t become liabilities.
Count your defensive liabilities: Zach, Lauri, Coby (at SG, if played alongside CP3). Your 3 top scorers aren’t stopping a street post. 35yo Paul is gonna lose his voice and give up.