Image ImageImage Image

Valentine signs QO; Dunn to ATL for 2/$10

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

Evil_Headband
Veteran
Posts: 2,532
And1: 1,005
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
   

Valentine signs QO; Dunn to ATL for 2/$10 

Post#1 » by Evil_Headband » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:00 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 20,929
And1: 31,930
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#2 » by Dominator83 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:02 pm

Surprised they didn't let both walk
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,200
And1: 11,075
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#3 » by MrSparkle » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:05 pm

Dunn made zero sense. Glad he can find a new gig. I think he'd fit LAL really well, as a 9-10th man... you can play him alongside small guards (Schroeder, Caruso)- they're probably losing Bradley or Rondo... He should take a tiny deal and prove himself.
User avatar
LateNight
Starter
Posts: 2,299
And1: 1,558
Joined: Jan 14, 2019
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#4 » by LateNight » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:07 pm

Bringing back Denzel at $4.6m / season is a weird choice with the current roster (seems high for his role). If you're making that deal, I'd assume you plan to actually use him - which might signal changes elsewhere in the roster.
cjbulls
Analyst
Posts: 3,584
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jun 26, 2018

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#5 » by cjbulls » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:08 pm

Shaq gave you 80% of what Dunn did. Any word on his QO?
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,176
And1: 30,131
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#6 » by HomoSapien » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:08 pm

I have to admit, I'm kind of bummed about Dunn. That first season we had him, he actually looked promising. It's a bummer we couldn't develop him properly.

Valentine annoys me at times, but I could see him having a Danny Green type of role on a contender.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,637
And1: 11,723
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#7 » by Michael Jackson » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:10 pm

I get not offering to Dunn but to Valentine? I think Dunn is more useful than Denzel honestly, but if you keep Shaq he brings what Dunn does in defense.

Valentine, must think they need him because he is disappointing to me on all levels.
TheFinishSniper
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,076
And1: 3,244
Joined: Feb 02, 2018
Location: Earth

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#8 » by TheFinishSniper » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:13 pm

Valentine. Dont understand...
jordanwilliams6
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,029
And1: 3,688
Joined: Nov 01, 2018
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#9 » by jordanwilliams6 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:22 pm

Dunn has been gone for a while. He was the only one that didn't attend the mini camp I believe.
User avatar
Kurt Heimlich
Head Coach
Posts: 6,932
And1: 5,562
Joined: Jun 26, 2001

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#10 » by Kurt Heimlich » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:29 pm

Michael Jackson wrote:I get not offering to Dunn but to Valentine? I think Dunn is more useful than Denzel honestly, but if you keep Shaq he brings what Dunn does in defense.

Valentine, must think they need him because he is disappointing to me on all levels.


These are all 8th to 12th man type guys so the dollar amounts probably played a heavy factor. The QO for Dunn was around $7M vs Denzel at around $4M. Plus having Shaq and his roughly $2M QO makes Dunn easier to let go.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 20,921
And1: 4,667
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#11 » by Hangtime84 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:29 pm

jordanwilliams6 wrote:Dunn has been gone for a while. He was the only one that didn't attend the mini camp I believe.



This is correct. I was concern now it’s official. He will find another role on a contender and get paid after.

This also affirms to me another pg is getting drafted
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
User avatar
MrFortune3
General Manager
Posts: 8,689
And1: 3,275
Joined: Jul 03, 2010
         

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#12 » by MrFortune3 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:29 pm

Not surprised. He didn't even attend camp. But keeping Val...c'mon man.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 12,937
And1: 9,948
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#13 » by nomorezorro » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:30 pm

i think if you squint, bringing back denzel makes sense? if we're gonna be cap constrained anyway you might as well bring back a shooter who can be salary filler in a trade.

dunn's QO is more expensive and he's probably more likely to get a legit contract offer elsewhere. not gonna act like i fully understand player/agent dynamics in situations like this, but i could see dunn being unhappy if he's brought back for only a year without a definite role carved out, whereas denzel is probably grateful for whatever he can get.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,665
And1: 6,701
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#14 » by PaKii94 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:32 pm

Val could be a decent role player for cheap. He's the kind of guy who isn't a star but raises the baseline for your bench (solid playmaking/rebounding/shooting). He was in Boylen's doghouse because he couldn't play Boylen's gimmicky blitz defense (but to be fair, only Dunn and Shaq could play that effectively)


I could see that coming for Dunn too. Shaq provides 80% of what Dunn does at bottom of the barrel salary. He did show some improvements in his shot as the season went on. If he continues to build on that he could be a solid 3/D guard to bring off the bench.
User avatar
TheSuzerain
RealGM
Posts: 17,365
And1: 11,390
Joined: Mar 29, 2012

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#15 » by TheSuzerain » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:33 pm

Denzel at a QO of $4 million makes sense as salary filler in a trade.

I doubt he gets $4 million on the open market this year.
UnFadeable21
Veteran
Posts: 2,712
And1: 845
Joined: Mar 30, 2019

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#16 » by UnFadeable21 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:35 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=21
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,176
And1: 30,131
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#17 » by HomoSapien » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:35 pm

Small chance this signals we're thinking of drafting a PG.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 26,787
And1: 8,907
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#18 » by sco » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:37 pm

YES!!! Done with Dunn.

I think that the reality is that, if the FO wanted, one of Dunn or Shaq can he had on a vet min deal. I also think that Val is a decent shooter/playmaker off the bench and can give minutes at SF, which is a useful skillset. It may also foreshadow a parting of the ways with Sato, who has similar attributes.
:clap:
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 20,751
And1: 15,174
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#19 » by kodo » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:38 pm

I honestly think you can get a better player than Valentine even for $4M, basically nothing.
His only contribution is shooting, and he shoots 33% from 3.
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,665
And1: 6,701
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#20 » by PaKii94 » Mon Nov 16, 2020 10:39 pm

UnFadeable21 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21



Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?

Jrue?
Rubio?

I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.

Return to Chicago Bulls