Image ImageImage Image

Valentine signs QO; Dunn to ATL for 2/$10

Moderators: HomoSapien, fleet, RedBulls23, Ice Man, AshyLarrysDiaper, Tommy Udo 6 , GimmeDat, dougthonus, Payt10, DASMACKDOWN, kulaz3000

User avatar
PaKii94
Head Coach
Posts: 7,037
And1: 3,807
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#61 » by PaKii94 » Tue Nov 17, 2020 1:35 am

Huh I thought they'd try to retain shaq. Now idk what they are up to now.
Pax for Prez
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,967
And1: 175
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: avoiding the WIFE

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#62 » by Pax for Prez » Tue Nov 17, 2020 1:36 am

I just noticed that Denzel Valentine and Otto Porter are both 27 years old. Who would have thought that ??
User avatar
Grodoboldo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,870
And1: 1,265
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Sao Paulo
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#63 » by Grodoboldo » Tue Nov 17, 2020 1:37 am

Read on Twitter


@SeanGrandePBP: So, this might be worth a [googly eyes emoji] . Just saying. If you're someone into doing this particular emoji thing here, this wouldn't be a bad place to do it, is all. https://t.co/JN8DHnjZql

Absolutely no **** idea what this means.

TheFinishSniper wrote:He means Bulls dropping a guard (pun) and drafting one.


Maybe this?
I don't know anything about college basketball. I would rather trade down/out. My Bulls big board for the 2020 Draft (as of November 17th):
1-Edwards; 2-Hayes; 3-Ball; 4-Haliburton; 5-Williams; 6-Lewis Jr; 7-Nesmith; 8-Vassel; 9-Avdija; 10-Okongwu.
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 30,810
And1: 7,978
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#64 » by League Circles » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:06 am

Pax for Prez wrote:I just noticed that Denzel Valentine and Otto Porter are both 27 years old. Who would have thought that ??

No kidding, Denzel looks like he's 37 on the court.
https://august-shop.com/ streetwear & sneakers
jkudia
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 28, 2006

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#65 » by jkudia » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:07 am

Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.

Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
User avatar
ThreeMileAllan
Starter
Posts: 2,398
And1: 592
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: San Diego via Chicago
       

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#66 » by ThreeMileAllan » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:16 am

jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.

Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?
Hmmmmmmmmm

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
On the Crawford/Rose bandwagon in 2002... 2009, 2011, 2012, 2017... :laugh: Finally in 2018! 16 year wait!
League Circles
RealGM
Posts: 30,810
And1: 7,978
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
       

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#67 » by League Circles » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:17 am

jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.

Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?

A 7th pick in a strong draft who met expectations for a #14 in a terrible draft????????
https://august-shop.com/ streetwear & sneakers
NecessaryEvil
Head Coach
Posts: 7,141
And1: 4,989
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#68 » by NecessaryEvil » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:36 am

jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.

Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?



I’d do that deal in a heartbeat
User avatar
LateNight
Junior
Posts: 479
And1: 336
Joined: Jan 14, 2019
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#69 » by LateNight » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:37 am

LateNight wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:Archi/Shaq/Mokoka/___/Kornet


I've also heard that the league is planning to expand two-way contracts... If that is the case, I'm guessing they'd probably try to sign Makoka or others with one of those slots rather than using up a roster spot.


Well, they extended a QO to Mokoka so looks like you may be right and I’m wrong
User avatar
Repeat 3-peat
RealGM
Posts: 10,616
And1: 10,223
Joined: Nov 02, 2013
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#70 » by Repeat 3-peat » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:44 am

Repeat 3-peat wrote:No Dunn, no Shaq=

Image


We are good everyone.
Read on Twitter
sco
RealGM
Posts: 15,568
And1: 4,116
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#71 » by sco » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:45 am

NecessaryEvil wrote:
jkudia wrote:Maybe I’m reading too deep into it, but he seems to be suggesting a bulls-celts trade. He’s a Boston beat writer. Another Boston beat writer (verified) did an eye emoji too.

Boston has 14, bulls want Lewis. WCJ for 14? Bigger package for heyward?



I’d do that deal in a heartbeat

Yeah, me too, and I like WC...actually though, I'd love Poku at 14. If we got him, I could live with the horrible, horrible pick of Deni at 4.
:clap:
User avatar
PaKii94
Head Coach
Posts: 7,037
And1: 3,807
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#72 » by PaKii94 » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:54 am

LateNight wrote:
LateNight wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:Archi/Shaq/Mokoka/___/Kornet


I've also heard that the league is planning to expand two-way contracts... If that is the case, I'm guessing they'd probably try to sign Makoka or others with one of those slots rather than using up a roster spot.


Well, they extended a QO to Mokoka so looks like you may be right and I’m wrong


I thought makoka was on a 2 year deal and I was assuming shaq would be back so I was half wrong too
weneeda2guard
Head Coach
Posts: 7,189
And1: 2,871
Joined: Feb 07, 2011

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#73 » by weneeda2guard » Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:55 am

The bulls need the slots and the space. I understand them moving on from shaq and Dunn. We are clearly about to add a pg and with coby arci and whoever we take at 4th here its just no minutes here for them. And I'm sorry I appreciate defense like anyone but these guys defense wasn't adding to winning basketball. Especially down the stretch of games where you can practically leave these guys wide open cause they can't score.
"they taking rose kindness for a weakness"
PhilLeotardo
Junior
Posts: 285
And1: 181
Joined: Sep 23, 2020
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#74 » by PhilLeotardo » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:22 am

Pax for Prez wrote:I just noticed that Denzel Valentine and Otto Porter are both 27 years old. Who would have thought that ??

What?
Red8911
RealGM
Posts: 10,516
And1: 2,484
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: BROOKLYN

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#75 » by Red8911 » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:40 am

PaKii94 wrote:
UnFadeable21 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21



Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?

Jrue?
Rubio?

I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.

Don’t forget Westbrook, never know...
User avatar
thedarkstark
Veteran
Posts: 2,922
And1: 926
Joined: Feb 17, 2010

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#76 » by thedarkstark » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:51 am

HomoSapien wrote:Seems like AK is signaling that he doesn't like one-dimensional point guards. At the end of the day, Dunn, Shaq, and Arci all shared a lot of similarities that made them redundant. I think we should expect a guard in this draft.


As long it's not Lamelo. My dream scenario would be trade #4 to Detroit for #7 and a future 1st, use #7 to draft Hayes or Haliburton.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,584
And1: 17,593
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn 

Post#77 » by HomoSapien » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:52 am

Red8911 wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
UnFadeable21 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21



Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?

Jrue?
Rubio?

I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.

Don’t forget Westbrook, never know...


Jrue and Rubio are both off the table now (although I could see OKC moving Rubio again). I've felt that Elfrid Payton has been undervalued the last few years. I guess Rose and Conley are other options.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
TheEndIsNigh
Junior
Posts: 428
And1: 389
Joined: Dec 22, 2012

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#78 » by TheEndIsNigh » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:56 am

If we make a deal with the Celtics it's likely just sending one pic for several, isn't it? I certainly don't see us sending anyone of value for 14.
MisterRoy
Starter
Posts: 2,036
And1: 707
Joined: Jun 19, 2011
     

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#79 » by MisterRoy » Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:59 am

Red8911 wrote:
PaKii94 wrote:
UnFadeable21 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21



Who are the available "experienced" PGs out there?

Jrue?
Rubio?

I'd love to somehow snag Jrue. That would be a get.

Don’t forget Westbrook, never know...

Yeah, it is still in the back of my mind. Something like Westbrook for Porter, Felicio and a 2nd, but that's it. The contract is long so no FRP or anything like that.


Sent from somewhere you've never been.
ZOMG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,985
And1: 2,309
Joined: Dec 31, 2013

Re: QO to Valentine but not Dunn. Page 3: Not to Shaq Harrison either 

Post#80 » by ZOMG » Tue Nov 17, 2020 6:05 am

Goodbye to all non-shooters. So sweet to be right.

Wendell is next (if they can find anyone who wants him, which isn't a given).
Current status: ACTIVE
Former status: BANNED FOR DERAILING DISCUSSION

Return to Chicago Bulls