Post#551 » by chefo » Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:09 am
The whole Al Horford comparison never made sense to me, going to before the draft.
I'm not sure who came up with it, but in college, they played nothing alike. Al's one and primary selling point coming out of college was that he was an absolute athletic beast in being able to stay with people on the outside on switches, while being strong enough to handle most bigs. Same was true for Jo, but Al was also thought to have a non-broken jumper. If you watched the Gators play that final championship year, they were an absolute terror on D to score against if you were a G or F. With Brewer, Jo and Al playing big minutes and you couldn't drive on any of them, or shoot over them. Most teams couldn't crack 60 against them... and when they were dialed in (and not hung over), they just destroyed people with their defense.
When I watched the Allen, Bagley, WCJ Blue Devils, a defensive juggernaut is about the last thing that came to my mind. I wouldn't call them porous, they were a decent team, but I didn't think them a Syracuse or Villanova, or something--they overwhelmed teams with Bagley, Allen and Trent scoring.
Furthermore, WCJ never stood out that much to me that I can remember. Bagley was all over the place and the star of that team. WCJ was a good cog player, but he kind of sucked in the tourney and I was really surprised that he was talked as a first round pick, let alone a consensus high lottery talent. I think in our pre-draft threads, I wrote as much. I thought that was much more great PR from whomever his family hired to market him, than him actually being a dominant college big... because he wasn't.
Now, WCJ was much younger than Al, but I literally saw nothing alike in their games. Al was much more slender and a vastly better athlete--and he played PF at FL. The Hawks repurposed him into a C because they had nothing better at the spot and him and Josh Smith were both athletic enough for them to get away with it most of the time.
Also, by his sophomore year, Al was already a very good player on a good team, and after, he was one of the best players on a pretty good to excellent Hawks teams. So, he was an impactful player from very early on. WCJ is three years in, and the best he's ever looked so far has been adequate, but nothing special, on a really bad team. I get that he's been unlucky to get stuck with Jimbo and Fred, but still, he's been given a ton of reps with the ball in his hands, both as a rook and this year. He's been unable to do much, despite in essence being force fed opportunities his first and 3rd year here.
At his lows, he's been almost unplayable bad this year--you can't have 5-6 game stretches where you average like 6&6 as a starter while your matchup is pretty much having a career night every game.
I see the Horford comparison even less than I did three years ago. I mean, they're almost like polar opposites--Al was a GREAT lateral athlete and a decent vertical athlete who saw the game extremely well--hence his high assists numbers. He was a prolific mid-range shooter who never hesitated to let it fly pretty much his entire career. He had great hands and could catch almost anything his guards threw near him. Does that description read ANYTHING like WCJ?
Old man Al is better than him at pretty much everything and he is about ready to hang them up after his deal is up.
Just apples and oranges.