Stratmaster wrote:TheSuzerain wrote:Stratmaster wrote:I think Temple can more than cover for Otto right now. Sato and Lauri coming back will certainly make a difference. Even Arch can be helpful for spot minutes so Zach can "rest on the court" a bit for a few minutes each half.
Sent from my SM-G965U using
RealGM mobile app
Yeah I don't think the guy with a PER of 8.1 can "more than cover" for the guy with a PER of 18.
Sato is solid enough, but it's not like we're replacing bad bench minutes with good bench minutes. We're already getting good bench mintues.
Lauri playing minutes instead of Thad/Otto/Pwill at the 4 is going to have negative effects defensively. Will it improve the offense enough to net out as positive? We're going to find out.
Gafford has a better PER than Otto.
PER is a horrible measurement, especially for a team that appears to have plenty of scoring and needs defense.
Temple can bring enough offensively and makes the team better defensively. Meanwhile, Otto may bring back something worthwhile in a trade, which I though was what you were hellbent to do.
But don't let all that interfere with your 9 game PER rating.
Sent from my SM-G965U using
RealGM mobile app
I didn't know anyone actually used PER any more lol. Especially someone who just a few minutes earlier said that:
"But you take away a couple of the vets (e.g. Otto, Sato, Thad), and I think this house of cards falls down."
Give Sato's (13.6 PER) minutes to Arci (15.0 PER), we should be better according to PER
Give Thad's (12.1 PER) minutes to Gafford (18.5 PER), we should be much, much better according to PER
There's a drop off from Otto (18.1 PER) to Val (15.2 PER), but we've still improved 2 of 3 positions.