StunnerKO wrote:
OK, that explains why his FTAs are low. He’s more of a pick and pop player.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson
StunnerKO wrote:
erlim wrote:ESPN says the Magic beat us at the trade deadline:
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31133915/nikola-vucevic-trade-grades-means-bulls-magic
Am2626 wrote:GimmeDat wrote:I'm always a bit precious about giving up picks because I love the draft and the allure of young players.
That said, if we wanted to keep Lavine around, which we should, something like this needed to get done. Vucevic is a legit All-Star, great player, and it's going to be incredibly fun to have a tandem like this to watch night in and night out. Someone has to say it, but I wish we did a deal like this when we had Jimmy.
It's a substantial price to pay, and I'm not definitive on where I set value wise with this deal. What I will say, I have been a WCJ defender for basically all his time here, and I still hope for the best for him, but I'm not devastated we've lost him. He needed a change of scenery, the development since his rookie season has been basically a plateau. I think he was a lot better than people realized, and I'll miss him, but he's the sort of player you are okay with giving up in a deal of this scale.
Whatever your take is on the price we had to pay, we're going to be a pretty good team now, let's enjoy it. It's clear AK is aggressive, has a vision, and will do what it takes to get there... I'm looking forward to seeing how this roster shapes up over the next year or two.
Exactly what price did the Bulls pay with this deal?They basically got rid of the trash that the previous FO left and significantly upgraded their roster. The draft picks are top 4 protected so even in the very unlikely chance that they get exercised now the Bulls would still keep them. Don’t see any downside at all with this deal.
GimmeDat wrote:Am2626 wrote:GimmeDat wrote:I'm always a bit precious about giving up picks because I love the draft and the allure of young players.
That said, if we wanted to keep Lavine around, which we should, something like this needed to get done. Vucevic is a legit All-Star, great player, and it's going to be incredibly fun to have a tandem like this to watch night in and night out. Someone has to say it, but I wish we did a deal like this when we had Jimmy.
It's a substantial price to
pay, and I'm not definitive on where I set value wise with this deal. What I will say, I have been a WCJ defender for basically all his time here, and I still hope for the best for him, but I'm not devastated we've lost him. He needed a change of scenery, the development since his rookie season has been basically a plateau. I think he was a lot better than people realized, and I'll miss him, but he's the sort of player you are okay with giving up in a deal of this scale.
Whatever your take is on the price we had to pay, we're going to be a pretty good team now, let's enjoy it. It's clear AK is aggressive, has a vision, and will do what it takes to get there... I'm looking forward to seeing how this roster shapes up over the next year or two.
Exactly what price did the Bulls pay with this deal?They basically got rid of the trash that the previous FO left and significantly upgraded their roster. The draft picks are top 4 protected so even in the very unlikely chance that they get exercised now the Bulls would still keep them. Don’t see any downside at all with this deal.
WCJ is a good big as is, has the chance to be very good. Two firsts is a lot to give up for anything.
I'm happy with the deal. But we paid a reasonable price on a high level talent. Naturally, we gave up a considerable amount.
TheFinishSniper wrote:erlim wrote:ESPN says the Magic beat us at the trade deadline:
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31133915/nikola-vucevic-trade-grades-means-bulls-magic
Yes they did. And I want every team from now on continue to beat us at the trade deadline and in offseason.
GimmeDat wrote:Am2626 wrote:GimmeDat wrote:I'm always a bit precious about giving up picks because I love the draft and the allure of young players.
That said, if we wanted to keep Lavine around, which we should, something like this needed to get done. Vucevic is a legit All-Star, great player, and it's going to be incredibly fun to have a tandem like this to watch night in and night out. Someone has to say it, but I wish we did a deal like this when we had Jimmy.
It's a substantial price to pay, and I'm not definitive on where I set value wise with this deal. What I will say, I have been a WCJ defender for basically all his time here, and I still hope for the best for him, but I'm not devastated we've lost him. He needed a change of scenery, the development since his rookie season has been basically a plateau. I think he was a lot better than people realized, and I'll miss him, but he's the sort of player you are okay with giving up in a deal of this scale.
Whatever your take is on the price we had to pay, we're going to be a pretty good team now, let's enjoy it. It's clear AK is aggressive, has a vision, and will do what it takes to get there... I'm looking forward to seeing how this roster shapes up over the next year or two.
Exactly what price did the Bulls pay with this deal?They basically got rid of the trash that the previous FO left and significantly upgraded their roster. The draft picks are top 4 protected so even in the very unlikely chance that they get exercised now the Bulls would still keep them. Don’t see any downside at all with this deal.
WCJ is a good big as is, has the chance to be very good. Two firsts is a lot to give up for anything.
I'm happy with the deal. But we paid a reasonable price on a high level talent. Naturally, we gave up a considerable amount.
I know Vuc usually outplays Embiid. I remember him having a triple double against him.BullChit wrote:https://youtu.be/1DhZYSCQu5w
I am still buzzing quite a bit guys.... Seeing him dunk on and hit shot over some of the centres we've been pining over....
Also on Vuce and defence.
At the very least he will make the likes of an Embiid, Jokic, hell he will make all.of his match ups expend energy on the defensive end so they aren't daisy fresh and ready to score 50+ points
Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
basketballRob wrote:I know Vuc usually outplays Embiid. I remember him having a triple double against him.BullChit wrote:https://youtu.be/1DhZYSCQu5w
I am still buzzing quite a bit guys.... Seeing him dunk on and hit shot over some of the centres we've been pining over....
Also on Vuce and defence.
At the very least he will make the likes of an Embiid, Jokic, hell he will make all.of his match ups expend energy on the defensive end so they aren't daisy fresh and ready to score 50+ points
Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
GimmeDat wrote:WCJ is a good big as is, has the chance to be very good. Two firsts is a lot to give up for anything.
I'm happy with the deal. But we paid a reasonable price on a high level talent. Naturally, we gave up a considerable amount.
GimmeDat wrote:Am2626 wrote:GimmeDat wrote:I'm always a bit precious about giving up picks because I love the draft and the allure of young players.
That said, if we wanted to keep Lavine around, which we should, something like this needed to get done. Vucevic is a legit All-Star, great player, and it's going to be incredibly fun to have a tandem like this to watch night in and night out. Someone has to say it, but I wish we did a deal like this when we had Jimmy.
It's a substantial price to pay, and I'm not definitive on where I set value wise with this deal. What I will say, I have been a WCJ defender for basically all his time here, and I still hope for the best for him, but I'm not devastated we've lost him. He needed a change of scenery, the development since his rookie season has been basically a plateau. I think he was a lot better than people realized, and I'll miss him, but he's the sort of player you are okay with giving up in a deal of this scale.
Whatever your take is on the price we had to pay, we're going to be a pretty good team now, let's enjoy it. It's clear AK is aggressive, has a vision, and will do what it takes to get there... I'm looking forward to seeing how this roster shapes up over the next year or two.
Exactly what price did the Bulls pay with this deal?They basically got rid of the trash that the previous FO left and significantly upgraded their roster. The draft picks are top 4 protected so even in the very unlikely chance that they get exercised now the Bulls would still keep them. Don’t see any downside at all with this deal.
WCJ is a good big as is, has the chance to be very good. Two firsts is a lot to give up for anything.
I'm happy with the deal. But we paid a reasonable price on a high level talent. Naturally, we gave up a considerable amount.
ZOMG wrote:CobyWhite0 wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:
In the NBA you don’t look past 5 years. Markkanen will have defensive compatibility issues with every center outside of maybe Gobert, Embiid and Allen.
LOL, talk about living in denial
It looks to be abundantly clear now that the Bulls don't see Lauri being on the roster once this season's playoffs end, and some fans are having a complete meltdown about it. They've spent many months trying to explain why Lauri is worth $20 million or more per year to the Bulls, and now they are finding out that AKME don't agree.
It makes you feel bad for the fans who weren't jerks about it
Meltdown? What? Who? Where?
In case you didn't notice, the Bulls didn't trade him even though they EASILY could have if they just wanted to get rid of him. And if he's not on the roster next season, it's because some team gave him $22 million dollars per season or something - because that team, you know, values him a lot.
I love how Lauri haters are now jumping through hoops to try to fabricate a narrative where these deadline moves OBVIOUSLY mean that they're getting ready to jettison him in the offseason. If anything, they might mean the opposite... but we just don't know. Let's wait and see how he performs with the new guys.
Life seems to be very hard for the average Markkanen hater right now. Let's all just relax.
sco wrote:GimmeDat wrote:Am2626 wrote:
Exactly what price did the Bulls pay with this deal?They basically got rid of the trash that the previous FO left and significantly upgraded their roster. The draft picks are top 4 protected so even in the very unlikely chance that they get exercised now the Bulls would still keep them. Don’t see any downside at all with this deal.
WCJ is a good big as is, has the chance to be very good. Two firsts is a lot to give up for anything.
I'm happy with the deal. But we paid a reasonable price on a high level talent. Naturally, we gave up a considerable amount.
WC isn't going to be a top 20 C for a long time, if ever. IMO, his best option is to get smaller, quicker and learn to shoot 3's.
sco wrote:I historically don't like C's over 30, but I get comfy because guys who have generally been injury-free and aren't leapers like the Lopezs and Gasols have a few more years of high-level play after 30, and IMO, his next deal isn't gonna be a MAX deal due to his age then.
NewKnicks wrote:sco wrote:I historically don't like C's over 30, but I get comfy because guys who have generally been injury-free and aren't leapers like the Lopezs and Gasols have a few more years of high-level play after 30, and IMO, his next deal isn't gonna be a MAX deal due to his age then.
Vuc is more of the exception to the rule. His style of play can last longer than the other C's. Skill and shooting are usually the last to go. It's not like he's some insane athlete who jumps out of the gym. He's good for another 5-6 years. And if it's only 3-4 years, isn't it still worth it? Bulls get an all-star for scraps. With the top 4 protection on the picks, they're losing a 5-16 player in this years draft. Who cares about that. Otto was a salary move and doesn't affect the Bulls, and then there is WCJ, not really a big loss.
Bulls front office nailed this trade. If Lauri was included, it would have been a different story.
Dresden wrote:sco wrote:GimmeDat wrote:
WCJ is a good big as is, has the chance to be very good. Two firsts is a lot to give up for anything.
I'm happy with the deal. But we paid a reasonable price on a high level talent. Naturally, we gave up a considerable amount.
WC isn't going to be a top 20 C for a long time, if ever. IMO, his best option is to get smaller, quicker and learn to shoot 3's.
The thing about Carter that sticks in my mind is that we never saw any flashes of greatness from him. Like absolutely none. No games with 6 blocks or something, where he's just a force in the paint. Or 25 points and 14 Rebs. I know he's young, but you'd think for someone who is said to have so much potential, we'd at least get an occasional glimpse of something worth waiting for. I guess he had a few nice blocks here and there, or a put back dunk or something, but compare him to Bagley, who, for all his injuries and issues, at least can look like a future all-star on some nights. With Wendell, I don't see anything but a very ordinary, pedestrian big with a very low ceiling, who might be serviceable one day as a low level starter or decent back up.
Michael Jackson wrote:The price wasn’t small really but it is the realistic price to make a trade today. Vuc wasn’t walking and has a good contract. Orlando needs a good return which is what they got. They got something for the future and he Bulls got something for today. Ideally we want vuc it’s out sending 2 picks but that wasn’t going to happen. Even though picks don’t work out that well thy are trade currency.
DuckIII wrote:TheFinishSniper wrote:erlim wrote:ESPN says the Magic beat us at the trade deadline:
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31133915/nikola-vucevic-trade-grades-means-bulls-magic
Yes they did. And I want every team from now on continue to beat us at the trade deadline and in offseason.
Forget Orlando. Where’s the cover story about AK getting pwned by Washington and Boston?