TheSuzerain wrote:I am somewhat concerned with the Lavine/Vuc fit offensively.
I think Vuc thrives in a team concept with snappy decisions and ball movement.
I know we like to think Lavine does too, but I think the truth of it is that Lavine best fit by far is what we had pre-Vuc trade where he could just thoughtlessly gun and freelance to get his own buckets.
Maybe Lavine can fill the Klay Thompson type role off-ball, but I don't think he's going to be averaging 30 points a game in that case.
The way I saw it, Zach needed to learn a two-man game. He’s improved seeing double-team traps and schemes, and before this slump, was pretty unstoppable in iso/1-on-1. but I’ve still never seen him make simple two-man plays besides pick and pop with Lauri. Now Thad is an example of a much more versatile partner, but he and Zach are volatile in their creation (look a little out of control, and it works against sub-500 teams and benches, but not a winning combo against +500 starters).
With Vuc, there are dozens more possibilities to explore, cause he basically shoots like Lauri, dribbles and passes with more control than Thagic and is a better post scorer. Zach expressed desire to run with a dominant center. IMO he needs this development to make sure we’re not investing max salary into an empty calorie scorer. At max salary, he should prove to be a net-positive (rather unstoppable) combo with Vuc. Definitely can't get that in a 2-game sample.
Zach and Thad were a huge plus compared to other Bulls 2-man lineups, so I’m optimistic with time Vuc/Zach will be a strong offensive tandem. If it pans out, then people won’t worry much about their defense. Early Murray and Jokic defensive tape would've made Thibodeau cry.