Jcool0 wrote:
Holy Lebron tampering!
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson
Jcool0 wrote:
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
R3AL1TY wrote:Hopefully, Klutch doesn't screw him out of good deals because with how they handled certain players' situations lately, I personally would avoid them if I was in the position of Zach.
fleet wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
Holy Lebron tampering!
DuckIII wrote:fleet wrote:Jcool0 wrote:
Holy Lebron tampering!
Ambiguous. But LeBron’s relationship with Klutch is problematic with regard to tampering, regardless.
RoseTheFuture22 wrote:The Anthony Davis angle in this is kind of interesting as a fellow clutch client. He will be a FA in 2024 for his last big deal when the DeRozan and Ball(another klutch client) contracts are up, Pat Williams will have a low cap hold as a RFA for his first big deal, and Zach will probably be in the midst of his new contract in his age 29 season. A Zach, Lonzo, Williams and Davis core would make a lot of sense
MGB wrote:Let’s play devils advocate and say first part of season goes south and we are near bottom of Eastern conference is there any chance we trade Lavine at deadline? Start process of a rebuild then since not many teams are going that route?
MGB wrote:Let’s play devils advocate and say first part of season goes south and we are near bottom of Eastern conference is there any chance we trade Lavine at deadline? Start process of a rebuild then since not many teams are going that route?
RoseTheFuture22 wrote:The Anthony Davis angle in this is kind of interesting as a fellow clutch client. He will be a FA in 2024 for his last big deal when the DeRozan and Ball(another klutch client) contracts are up, Pat Williams will have a low cap hold as a RFA for his first big deal, and Zach will probably be in the midst of his new contract in his age 29 season. A Zach, Lonzo, Williams and Davis core would make a lot of sense
coldfish wrote:Zach should file a complaint. Some of those non calls were battery complaints.
Stratmaster wrote:Will Perdue says asinine things, and his pants are way too short.
sco wrote: New Orleans has to be one of the, if not THE hardest city to eat healthy. I think they fry the water.
MGB wrote:Let’s play devils advocate and say first part of season goes south and we are near bottom of Eastern conference is there any chance we trade Lavine at deadline? Start process of a rebuild then since not many teams are going that route?
MGB wrote:Let’s play devils advocate and say first part of season goes south and we are near bottom of Eastern conference is there any chance we trade Lavine at deadline? Start process of a rebuild then since not many teams are going that route?
Mk0 wrote:The Ringer and Windhorst podcasts looooved to run the idea that Derozan is "Zach insurance"; as in, we don't need to max you, we have DeMar. Their other angle is "omg Klutch! He is good as gone! He said he wanted respect and they spent all that money instead of extending him!!!1!!"
*Frankly just sounded like, they are tired af talking about Ben Simmons and need to speculate who they can trade Simmons for that isn't named Damian Lillard. These guys have nothing to report on or speculate about.. Hell, one podcast did the same crap with Jaylen Brown for Simmons.
It all sounds just as dumb as it reads. The FO just gave him the most talented collection of teammates in his life, had they extended him this summer (which would have been dumb on his part, he makes more in the end as a UFA [right?]) they would not have had the money to build anything. He would have been paid but this team would be as bad or worse as last year.. and then he would probably ask for a trade in the summer.
RoseTheFuture22 wrote:MGB wrote:Let’s play devils advocate and say first part of season goes south and we are near bottom of Eastern conference is there any chance we trade Lavine at deadline? Start process of a rebuild then since not many teams are going that route?
I think it is possible. Zach said a few months ago that he wanted "respect" in contract talks. We don't know if any kind of extension or other future talks took place this offseason. Does the FO not want to give him his full max and that is why he hired Klutch? Although I think AKME like Zach, they have shown so far that they really did not like the player from the previous regime.
The front office has put more talent around him than he has ever had in his career thus far, if this team comes out and struggles again I think it could start to look to the FO that Zach can't be "the guy" and isn't worth that supermax. I don't think going full rebuild is an option based on the other moves that they've made but I could see the Ben Simmons deal or getting a guy who is a lesser player but maybe less ball dominant/better defensively.
Mk0 wrote:The Ringer and Windhorst podcasts looooved to run the idea that Derozan is "Zach insurance"; as in, we don't need to max you, we have DeMar. Their other angle is "omg Klutch! He is good as gone! He said he wanted respect and they spent all that money instead of extending him!!!1!!"
*Frankly it just sounded like they are tired af talking about Ben Simmons and need to speculate who they can trade him for that isn't named Damian Lillard. These guys have nothing to report on or speculate about.. Hell, one podcast did the same crap with Jaylen Brown for Simmons.
It all sounds just as dumb as it reads. The FO just gave him the most talented collection of teammates in his life, had they extended him this summer (which would have been dumb on his part, he makes more in the end as a UFA [right?]) they would not have had the money to build anything. He would have been paid but this team would be as bad or worse as last year.. and then he would probably ask for a trade in the summer.
Chi town wrote:Mk0 wrote:The Ringer and Windhorst podcasts looooved to run the idea that Derozan is "Zach insurance"; as in, we don't need to max you, we have DeMar. Their other angle is "omg Klutch! He is good as gone! He said he wanted respect and they spent all that money instead of extending him!!!1!!"
*Frankly just sounded like, they are tired af talking about Ben Simmons and need to speculate who they can trade Simmons for that isn't named Damian Lillard. These guys have nothing to report on or speculate about.. Hell, one podcast did the same crap with Jaylen Brown for Simmons.
It all sounds just as dumb as it reads. The FO just gave him the most talented collection of teammates in his life, had they extended him this summer (which would have been dumb on his part, he makes more in the end as a UFA [right?]) they would not have had the money to build anything. He would have been paid but this team would be as bad or worse as last year.. and then he would probably ask for a trade in the summer.
Zach leaving is laughable. He recruited DD. He sees
this as his team with great support to win.
FanInTheAttic wrote:There's is no point in maxing Zach's contract if the Bulls are not in the playoffs next year with this team, and why would Zach stay?