fleet wrote:MikeDC wrote:fleet wrote:Hear P&S saying Ayton could be available? WTF, Id be all in on that. This current build isn’t going to work if this team is so fragile.
Without flat out saying I don’t want Ayton, I’m just going to point out that he’s maybe not even as good as Wendell Carter (there are a variety of metrics that favor Carter-who was practically ridden out of town on a rail) and will literally cost twice as much.
Point is, it would be another top dollar transaction. Paying big money and/or picks instead of seeking value. Which is fine… but then don’t cry poor when it comes to filling out the roster if you’re going to overpay for guys like this
Not sure at the end of the day what kinds of assets it would require. But the kid is young. And at the end of the day size is becoming more important than it has been. If we would have to start over then around him, it is what it is. what we have going now without Lonzo is kind of untenable to a championship build. As I said previously, maybe that’s the wrong thinking, but some people are wired to go for championship type builds rather than settling for being a stepping stone for the bigger fish in the post season.
Ayton is not a guy to build around in the same way that Vuc wouldn't be the guy to build around if he was 23. If you're going to overpay him because that's the only way you can keep adding pieces, then that's fine.
But he's a cog, not a building block. By most of the measures of production I see, he's not even one of the top 15 centers, and doesn't look on a path to be. Like, I'd much rather have Isaiah Hartenstein for $8M and have another $20M to spend on players than have Ayton at $28M. There's not $20M of difference between those guys.
Now, if I'm the GM, and Michael Reinsdorf says "Money is no object, you can have Ayton at $28M and then go spend another $20M and I'm cool with it, then fine, I'll take Ayton. But I don't think he's gonna say that.