Jeffster81 wrote:fleet wrote:Jeffster81 wrote:
San Fran cannot be that stupid to even remotely entertain the idea that Nick Foles 2 (aka Brock Purdy) is the guy going forward? Best thing for San Fran is to trade Purdy while he has value.
Purdy is pretty nice in and out of the pocket. Slides with good footwork very well to get off throws. Maybe your point is Purdy is catching playoffs lightning in a bottle like Foles, but Purdy is more mobile and nifty. I think he’s a competent backup minimum with some legit journeyman starter potential. More than that is hard to say at this point. But incidentally to localize it, that’s what Justin has to be able to do, as Martz points out. The good ones can slide in the pocket, they don’t need to bail.
That's the point. Right now he is the product of Kyle S. as head coach and having All-World players at WR, RB and TE. Purdy will never have the same kind of value than what he will have this off-season. Let another team thinks he for real and give up a real draft asset.
If the 49ers want to hang on to Purdy has a solid backup option at QB, but if they intend to make him their future at QB, then you might as well slam the 49ers window shut and lock it.
A mediocre talent like Purdy rarely wins Super Bowls.
Oh? I'm not sure what your definition of "mediocre talent" is, but meh quarterbacks winning Super Bowls is relatively common. Stafford, Foles, and Flacco have all done so in the last decade. Eli Manning was pretty mediocre and he has rings. And I don't think Tom Brady and Kurt Warner are "mediocre talents," obviously, but if you're talking about draft status, they are comparable to Purdy.
I have no idea whether Purdy will ultimately be great and I agree SF's system and talent is going to elevate a QB, but there's plenty of history in the NFL of later drafted guys becoming elite and of teams finding ways to win Super Bowls with just OK QB play.