PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,458
- And1: 30,531
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Turns out we're not bad because of DDR. Shocker.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,458
- And1: 30,531
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
If I'm Westbrook, I'm worried playing on the Bulls will only further hurt my stock.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- DASMACKDOWN
- Forum Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 30,382
- And1: 15,622
- Joined: Nov 01, 2001
- Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
HomoSapien wrote:Turns out we're not bad because of DDR. Shocker.
We arent exactly better with him either. So im not sure where that is coming from. DDR also played when we were up 21 and lost.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
The Explorer
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,796
- And1: 3,360
- Joined: Jul 11, 2005
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
I don't think this team is capable of holding a lead of even 30 or 40 points. Just dumb players, dumb coaching all around.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
aguifs
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,087
- And1: 1,578
- Joined: Jul 14, 2009
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
The tank potential in us is promising.
Call it a season. Sit friggin Lavine, let Benny and Terry play
Call it a season. Sit friggin Lavine, let Benny and Terry play
#FIREAKME #BOYCOTTABULL #REINSDORKSELLTHEFRANCHISE
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
jordanwilliams6
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,155
- And1: 3,796
- Joined: Nov 01, 2018
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
AKME made probably the worst mistake of his tenure in not selling this team at the deadline.
There is zero point in being a good basketball player if you can't execute in the final two minutes of a game. ZERO.
There is zero point in being a good basketball player if you can't execute in the final two minutes of a game. ZERO.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- Chicago-Bull-E
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,302
- And1: 7,634
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Would love to see a poll on who thought Zach had a good game vs who thought he didn’t.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
weneeda2guard
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,490
- And1: 5,005
- Joined: Feb 07, 2011
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Although I was critical of lavine earlier
This really wasn't on lavine
We had a line up that was working and Donovan again went away from it
You can't have 2 non shooters on the floor with lavine and coby. All you have to do is look where the help is coming from to swarm vuc coby and lavine.
This really wasn't on lavine
We had a line up that was working and Donovan again went away from it
You can't have 2 non shooters on the floor with lavine and coby. All you have to do is look where the help is coming from to swarm vuc coby and lavine.
"they taking rose kindness for a weakness"
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,458
- And1: 30,531
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
DASMACKDOWN wrote:HomoSapien wrote:Turns out we're not bad because of DDR. Shocker.
We arent exactly better with him either. So im not sure where that is coming from. DDR also played when we were up 21 and lost.
It's just a terrible takeaway to argue that we're better without our best player. We're 1-4 without him. He's not the problem. We're just built terribly.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
ChiCityHoops34
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,603
- And1: 1,796
- Joined: Jan 20, 2016
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Zach doesn't hate to lose. Don't max guys that don't hate to lose.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
BigUps
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,581
- And1: 5,731
- Joined: Dec 08, 2004
- Location: Limits, like fears, are often just an illusion.
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
What would you say Billy is good at? Honest question. What is he good at from a coaching perspective? He has zero identity to his coaching style which is why this team has zero identity.
He has to go.
He has to go.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
MrSparkle
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,442
- And1: 11,222
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Well, the 3Ps were a step in the right direction. Still can't close a basketball game, which is a shame. 
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
weneeda2guard
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,490
- And1: 5,005
- Joined: Feb 07, 2011
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
aguifs wrote:The tank potential on us is promising.
Call it a season. Sit friggin Lavine, let Benny and Terry play
We are not tanking
With no quality pg to initiate the offense and run plays and no consistent outside shooting, we are just really bad.
"they taking rose kindness for a weakness"
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- GoBlue72391
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,119
- And1: 7,287
- Joined: Oct 26, 2009
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Zach was getting doubled in the corner, had Ayo wide open on the wing and decides a double contested corner fade is a better shot.
How many times does he have to screw up in the clutch before we go to another option in those moments?
Honestly, with no DeMar and Coby feeling it, I would have liked to use Zach as a decoy and give the ball to Coby in that situation.
Sent from my SM-S127DL using RealGM mobile app
How many times does he have to screw up in the clutch before we go to another option in those moments?
Honestly, with no DeMar and Coby feeling it, I would have liked to use Zach as a decoy and give the ball to Coby in that situation.
Sent from my SM-S127DL using RealGM mobile app
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- Chicago-Bull-E
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,302
- And1: 7,634
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Big win for the tankers. Pacers are winning battle, Chicago will win the war*
*The war of course, being future playoff revenue without paying luxury tax. 2026 will be the time for that.
*The war of course, being future playoff revenue without paying luxury tax. 2026 will be the time for that.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Re: PG:
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls

- Posts: 37,458
- And1: 30,531
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: PG:
BigUps wrote:What would you say Billy is good at? Honest question.
His hair is better now than when he was younger. That's all I can think of.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- BullChit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,936
- And1: 3,888
- Joined: Jan 17, 2011
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
I am going to save so much time now by not watching another bulls game this season by just assuming it will look exactly like every other game has looked.
eMar arnell eRozen... The "D" stands for "Defence"
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
-
JimmyButler21
- Starter
- Posts: 2,194
- And1: 1,722
- Joined: Nov 21, 2015
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
- Miltpalaciofanclub
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,346
- And1: 99
- Joined: Jan 25, 2004
- Location: My Dad, like, owns a dealership...
-
Re: PG: "Better Without DeRozan"
Funny, but a little too far.












