Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2023 thread V

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

MalagaBulls
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,067
And1: 2,223
Joined: Dec 15, 2013
Location: Malaga, Spain (Where the Sun shines 300 days a year))
         

Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#1 » by MalagaBulls » Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:51 am

D was pretty decent, time for a new thread.

Read on Twitter
Bandit King
Analyst
Posts: 3,498
And1: 1,178
Joined: Oct 14, 2012
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#2 » by Bandit King » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:03 am

Bagent wins again!!!!
Chicago Bulls Basketball - The Continuity
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,161
And1: 10,255
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#3 » by nomorezorro » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:11 am

can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,354
And1: 1,335
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#4 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:15 am

nomorezorro wrote:can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol


Yep, we probably won’t have to imagine it next season.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,184
And1: 6,651
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#5 » by Dresden » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:15 am

nomorezorro wrote:can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol


When they showed the shot of the Panthers owner near the end of the game, shaking his head, I was thinking, man, what on earth ever possessed them to give up their #1 pick this year to move up to take Bryce Young? What a terrible decision, in hindsight.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 14,184
And1: 6,651
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#6 » by Dresden » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:16 am

What a snooze fest of a game! One exciting play the whole night. Two extremely incompetent offenses battling it out to see who could be the first to reach 20 points.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,161
And1: 10,255
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#7 » by nomorezorro » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:20 am

IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol


Yep, we probably won’t have to imagine it next season.


i would honestly be shocked if we drafted bryce young this offseason
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,354
And1: 1,335
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#8 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:21 am

Bandit King wrote:Bagent wins again!!!!


Didn’t you want us to draft Bryce Young?
IliketheBullsNBearstoo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,354
And1: 1,335
Joined: Sep 27, 2001
Location: Socal
     

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#9 » by IliketheBullsNBearstoo » Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:22 am

nomorezorro wrote:
IliketheBullsNBearstoo wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol


Yep, we probably won’t have to imagine it next season.


i would honestly be shocked if we drafted bryce young this offseason


No but we’ll probably have the same taste in our mouths.
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 69,965
And1: 37,284
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#10 » by fleet » Fri Nov 10, 2023 1:12 pm

nomorezorro wrote:can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol

There are questions a team other than the Panthers would have. Apparently the GM wanted Stroud. Young’s choice was from owner interference. As bad as the McCaskeys tend to be, they don’t do stuff like that.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,270
And1: 9,145
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#11 » by sco » Fri Nov 10, 2023 1:35 pm

Gotta say I like the Prime viewing experience. More flexibility to watch highlights.

This was the first game in a while that I was rooting for a W.

Game was no sort of measuring stick (unless its to see who is the worst team). Bagent looked his most comfortable. His long throws aren't his strength, but not turn-overs or sacks. OL looked not horrible, but again, no real test there. Defense looked better. Sweat makes a difference in terms of turning our zero pressure squad into something mediocre looking, but we still need another guy to have a real pass rush.
:clap:
the ultimates
Analyst
Posts: 3,671
And1: 1,616
Joined: Jul 06, 2012

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#12 » by the ultimates » Fri Nov 10, 2023 1:57 pm

I really don't get people crapping on Bryce Young. Remember people were crapping on Tua before Miami made improvements to the line and actually got him some weapons. Then all of a sudden Tua looked like he did at Alabama. If the Panthers can do that Young will be fine.
Losing to get high draft picks and hoping they turn into franchise players is not some next level, genius move. That's what teams want to happen in any rebuild/tank or whatever you want to market it as.
User avatar
Bulls69
Head Coach
Posts: 6,689
And1: 478
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: LA via Chicago

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#13 » by Bulls69 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 2:01 pm

fleet wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:can you imagine if we drafted bryce young lol

There are questions a team other than the Panthers would have. Apparently the GM wanted Stroud. Young’s choice was from owner interference. As bad as the McCaskeys tend to be, they don’t do stuff like that.


I'm not a Big fan of our current ownership but be careful on who you wish for remember when Daniel Snyder ran Washington into the ground.
Knicksgod wrote: I know LeBron won't go to Chicago. There could be another surprise team, but if he leaves Cleveland, then teaming with Bosh and Gallo in NYC is a likely scenario.
User avatar
Bulls69
Head Coach
Posts: 6,689
And1: 478
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: LA via Chicago

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#14 » by Bulls69 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 2:19 pm

the ultimates wrote:I really don't get people crapping on Bryce Young. Remember people were crapping on Tua before Miami made improvements to the line and actually got him some weapons. Then all of a sudden Tua looked like he did at Alabama. If the Panthers can do that Young will be fine.

Folks wants instant gratification if the Bears draft another QB next season expect the same deal the QB position is very hard to master in the NFL.
Knicksgod wrote: I know LeBron won't go to Chicago. There could be another surprise team, but if he leaves Cleveland, then teaming with Bosh and Gallo in NYC is a likely scenario.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,656
And1: 902
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#15 » by Almost Retired » Fri Nov 10, 2023 2:53 pm

We will have to see how Fields does over the rest of the season. We have some tough games coming, especially the two against Detroit. The best scenario would be for Fields to show competence, at least enough to give him one more year. Maybe he would look better with a starting WR core of Dj Moore, Marvin Harrison Jr and Darnell Moody in the slot. And then add Fashanu at left tackle, who hasn't given up a sack all year. If we add Fashanu we are set at starting tackles for the next 8 years (barring injury). The right side of the line is looking good with Wright and Jenkins. We just need to upgrade from Whitehair and Patrick and we'd have a pretty good O-Line. We have depth at RB. It could be that Getsy is the bigger problem, not Fields.
HearshotKDS
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,901
And1: 1,066
Joined: Apr 17, 2010
 

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#16 » by HearshotKDS » Fri Nov 10, 2023 2:57 pm

sco wrote:Gotta say I like the Prime viewing experience. More flexibility to watch highlights.

This was the first game in a while that I was rooting for a W.

Game was no sort of measuring stick (unless its to see who is the worst team). Bagent looked his most comfortable. His long throws aren't his strength, but not turn-overs or sacks. OL looked not horrible, but again, no real test there. Defense looked better. Sweat makes a difference in terms of turning our zero pressure squad into something mediocre looking, but we still need another guy to have a real pass rush.


Huge fan of the prime viewing experience, wider view so you can see the field and the route trails on receivers are awesome. Would pay good money to get every game like this.
Almost Retired
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,656
And1: 902
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#17 » by Almost Retired » Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:02 pm

the ultimates wrote:I really don't get people crapping on Bryce Young. Remember people were crapping on Tua before Miami made improvements to the line and actually got him some weapons. Then all of a sudden Tua looked like he did at Alabama. If the Panthers can do that Young will be fine.


Just as a general rule I would not draft a short QB. Young is only 5' 10". There have not been many success stories for QBs shorter than 6 foot in the modern NFL. There just haven't. Maybe he breaks the mold once Carolina can get him sufficient weapons. But that could take years. Stroud is 6' 3". I would have drafted him instead of Young based on height alone. I think Carolina is going to regret the Young pick every bit as much as Bears fans regret the incredibly stupid decision to trade assets to move up and grab Trubisky.
User avatar
Bulls69
Head Coach
Posts: 6,689
And1: 478
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: LA via Chicago

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#18 » by Bulls69 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:14 pm

Almost Retired wrote:We will have to see how Fields does over the rest of the season. We have some tough games coming, especially the two against Detroit. The best scenario would be for Fields to show competence, at least enough to give him one more year. Maybe he would look better with a starting WR core of Dj Moore, Marvin Harrison Jr and Darnell Moody in the slot. And then add Fashanu at left tackle, who hasn't given up a sack all year. If we add Fashanu we are set at starting tackles for the next 8 years (barring injury). The right side of the line is looking good with Wright and Jenkins. We just need to upgrade from Whitehair and Patrick and we'd have a pretty good O-Line. We have depth at RB. It could be that Getsy is the bigger problem, not Fields.

This is why I say stay the course bring in a new coaching staff and build around our QB if they Marvin JR. and the LT from Penn State now they are cooking.
Knicksgod wrote: I know LeBron won't go to Chicago. There could be another surprise team, but if he leaves Cleveland, then teaming with Bosh and Gallo in NYC is a likely scenario.
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,134
And1: 1,832
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#19 » by nitetrain8603 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:17 pm

HearshotKDS wrote:
sco wrote:Gotta say I like the Prime viewing experience. More flexibility to watch highlights.

This was the first game in a while that I was rooting for a W.

Game was no sort of measuring stick (unless its to see who is the worst team). Bagent looked his most comfortable. His long throws aren't his strength, but not turn-overs or sacks. OL looked not horrible, but again, no real test there. Defense looked better. Sweat makes a difference in terms of turning our zero pressure squad into something mediocre looking, but we still need another guy to have a real pass rush.


Huge fan of the prime viewing experience, wider view so you can see the field and the route trails on receivers are awesome. Would pay good money to get every game like this.


Don't say that too loud, because Amazon already charges for Prime, they'll charge an additional amount to have those views.

Bagent looked decent. Again, I think his floor is a high end backup in the NFL. Makes quick decisions, usually finds the right guy with the decision making, but as he stated, he has to get acclimated to the NFL speed.
nitetrain8603
RealGM
Posts: 24,134
And1: 1,832
Joined: May 30, 2003
         

Re: Bears 2023 thread V 

Post#20 » by nitetrain8603 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 3:18 pm

Almost Retired wrote:We will have to see how Fields does over the rest of the season. We have some tough games coming, especially the two against Detroit. The best scenario would be for Fields to show competence, at least enough to give him one more year. Maybe he would look better with a starting WR core of Dj Moore, Marvin Harrison Jr and Darnell Moody in the slot. And then add Fashanu at left tackle, who hasn't given up a sack all year. If we add Fashanu we are set at starting tackles for the next 8 years (barring injury). The right side of the line is looking good with Wright and Jenkins. We just need to upgrade from Whitehair and Patrick and we'd have a pretty good O-Line. We have depth at RB. It could be that Getsy is the bigger problem, not Fields.


I don't think you can for the simple reason that the following year's QB class doesn't look nearly as good. You give him another year, and he doesn't pan out or he looks like he has for his career and now you're stuck overpaying for a QB in a trade and wages, OR you're taking a shot at a QB or Shadeur Sanders stayed at Colorado and you sucked so hard that you had a chance to draft him.

Return to Chicago Bulls