Bears 2024 3.0
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , Michael Jackson, DASMACKDOWN, dougthonus, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, fleet
Bears 2024 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,367
- And1: 2,069
- Joined: Apr 28, 2004
Bears 2024 3.0
Since we hit 100 on the last thread, figured this would be a good topic to start the new one.
Follow me at http://twitter.com/2witterlessFred
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,493
- And1: 404
- Joined: Jun 21, 2006
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
Figured this would be the case.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,458
- And1: 810
- Joined: Dec 07, 2001
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
The top 3 QBs should all be advised not to throw.. McCarthy Penix and Nix are the ones who have the most to gain.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
- CjayC
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,530
- And1: 1,158
- Joined: Mar 02, 2005
- Location: Hoiball
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
For non twitter users:
Spoiler:
Grats to Peter King on the retirement, but this is worded very confusingly.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 66,527
- And1: 34,480
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 66,527
- And1: 34,480
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
The effs he talking about wind? There is no wind. Except for him
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
- Chicago-Bull-E
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,116
- And1: 7,421
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
That would be quite the disaster, trading down twice to Atlanta.
Wonder if they know the meeting with Caleb isn’t going to go well.
Wonder if they know the meeting with Caleb isn’t going to go well.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,367
- And1: 2,069
- Joined: Apr 28, 2004
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
This is interesting. And I doubt Peter King says this without some type of inside knowledge. Though it could be the Bears putting out fake feelers to raise the trade value.
However, it is hilarious that he goes into retirement and sets the bridge on fire behind him on the way out
However, it is hilarious that he goes into retirement and sets the bridge on fire behind him on the way out
Follow me at http://twitter.com/2witterlessFred
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,796
- And1: 1,103
- Joined: Sep 27, 2001
- Location: Socal
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Since we hit 100 on the last thread, figured this would be a good topic to start the new one.
I get it but this bothers me.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,367
- And1: 2,069
- Joined: Apr 28, 2004
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
I’m sure it means nothing but if the national conversation continues to be the Bears are looking to trade down and build the team up, especially this week, there may be fire to all the smoke.
But it’s super early. Though there does seem to be a shift from the guarantee that it felt it was a few weeks ago.
Follow me at http://twitter.com/2witterlessFred
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,220
- And1: 2,366
- Joined: Aug 17, 2017
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
If this is leaked information Poles is managing this beautifully. In the end, I think this is all about boosting JF trade value. Let other teams know that keeping Fields is on the table and they might bump up their offers. Well played.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
- molepharmer
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,582
- And1: 1,178
- Joined: Feb 27, 2002
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
Or.... this is NFL Combine week and so there'll be plenty of rumors and speculation. You won't get much press or hits if you spout what over 80% of the country expects will happen. If it ain't different, it's not news.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,493
- And1: 404
- Joined: Jun 21, 2006
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
“I know nothing, but that seems to be the way the wind is blowing”
WTF is that supposed to mean?
WTF is that supposed to mean?
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,356
- And1: 2,673
- Joined: Oct 29, 2004
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
fleet wrote:The effs he talking about wind? There is no wind. Except for him
But it’s Peter King. He’s super credible and would never put that credibility on the line if he had heard nothing right?
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,367
- And1: 2,069
- Joined: Apr 28, 2004
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
Betta Bulleavit wrote:fleet wrote:The effs he talking about wind? There is no wind. Except for him
But it’s Peter King. He’s super credible and would never put that credibility on the line if he had heard nothing right?
Follow me at http://twitter.com/2witterlessFred
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,356
- And1: 2,673
- Joined: Oct 29, 2004
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
_txchilibowl_ wrote:If this is leaked information Poles is managing this beautifully. In the end, I think this is all about boosting JF trade value. Let other teams know that keeping Fields is on the table and they might bump up their offers. Well played.
This is a very real possibility. The absolute best thing that Poles can do right now is drop signals that enhance the value of both the pick and Fields so as to keep his options as broad as possible for as long as possible. And there is a strategy that goes along with doing that. This could very well be part of that strategy.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
- nomorezorro
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,331
- And1: 9,174
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
- Location: appropriately compensated
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
if peter king was legitimately breaking news about what the bears are doing with the first overall pick, it would not be bullet point number two on item number nine on his "ten things i think i think" feature, buried more than 10,000 words into his column
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 66,527
- And1: 34,480
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
biggestbullsfan wrote:
I’m sure it means nothing but if the national conversation continues to be the Bears are looking to trade down and build the team up, especially this week, there may be fire to all the smoke.
But it’s super early. Though there does seem to be a shift from the guarantee that it felt it was a few weeks ago.
when you mention “national conversation”, so far it’s 2 guys. One was just speculating based on the Breer report that there would be a quarterback direction chosen this week. The other, I have no idea what “winds” he is talking about. There’s been no Fields winds.
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
-
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 66,527
- And1: 34,480
- Joined: Dec 23, 2002
Re: Bears 2024 3.0
Betta Bulleavit wrote:fleet wrote:The effs he talking about wind? There is no wind. Except for him
But it’s Peter King. He’s super credible and would never put that credibility on the line if he had heard nothing right?
That’s true. It’s Biggs wind V King wind. But the Biggs wind was definitely blowing that we could see.