Image ImageImage Image

Last Air Jordans? Nike unveils 23rd Air Jordan

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,648
And1: 24,859
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Last Air Jordans? Nike unveils 23rd Air Jordan 

Post#1 » by kulaz3000 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:01 pm

It's gotta be the shoes, right?

No other basketball shoe has changed the face of business, athletics and marketing like the Air Jordan. This month, Nike releases the 23rd edition, and it is expected to be just as venerated as its predecessors.

The sleek design and link to Michael Jordan's jersey number make it a touchstone in the line. It's also Nike's first basketball shoe designed under its "Considered" ethos, which aims to reduce waste and use environmentally friendly materials wherever possible.

The Air Jordan XX3 will be released in three hyped-up rounds from January to February, starting with a limited edition to be sent to only 23 retailers to be sold for $230 and concluding with the national launch at $185.

There had been talk at Nike about retiring the shoe at No. 23, because of his iconic jersey number. But company officials won't say whether this will be the last of the line. Neither will Jordan.

"You'll just have to wait and see," Jordan said in an e-mail to The Associated Press, responding to questions about the upcoming release.

Before launching the first shoe in 1985, Nike had just signed Jordan for $2.5 million over five years. Nike won't say what Jordan's current contract with the company is worth.

Jordan's deal with Nike opened the door for sneaker manufacturers to chase after athletes, signing them up --sometimes just out of high school-- for multimillion-dollar contracts in hopes of being able to cash in on the next superstar. It sent sneaker prices to new heights, which has since generated a backlash against selling pricey shoes to basketball-loving kids.

"The Air Jordan franchise created the most coveted basketball footwear in the world and changed the basketball landscape forever," said Nike Brand President Charlie Denson.

Unlike most basketball shoes to date, which were often white and utilitarian, the Air Jordan was a shock of black and red. It was initially banned by the NBA for not conforming with other players' shoes.

Jordan continued to wear them and was fined $5,000 a game, which Nike paid.

"Nobody expected the mass hysteria created by its release," Jordan, who has been a part-owner of the Charlotte Bobcats since 2006, said in his e-mail to The AP.

A new edition was launched each year, and release dates had to be moved to the weekends to keep kids from skipping school to get a pair.

The frenzy got dangerous. People were mugged and even killed for the shoes.

The Air Jordans helped spawn a subculture of collectors, who line up at stores to buy the shoe's latest edition.

Jordan said he never expected that the shoe would become an icon.

"Like every kid growing up, I dreamed of making winning shots at the buzzer and I was fortunate to live out that dream, but never in my wildest dreams did I ever entertain the idea of the success of the Air Jordan franchise," he said.

The Air Jordans moved basketball shoes from true high-tops or low-tops to a middle range and used unheard of styles, such as patent leather toes and elephant print.

As Jordan's success grew on the courts, so did Nike's in the shoe industry.

People from the streets to the suburbs were wearing $100-plus basketball shoes, which was unheard of at the time.

That price is the norm today, but it has launched a backlash, such as the partnership between New York Knicks player Stephon Marbury and the Steve & Barry's store chain to sell basketball shoes for $14.98 -- a direct stab at pricey sneakers like Air Jordans.

At that time, the Air Jordan captured a mix of design, marketing, athleticism and player charisma that hadn't been seen before in the industry -- everyone wanted to "Be Like Mike."

"Athletes had been endorsing products for years prior to this," said Tinker Hatfield, Nike's Vice President of Innovation Design and Special Projects.

"But they were just signing their name to the shoe. I think there was a very understandable difference...Michael's personality and even the changes in the game and inspiration from other walks of life were all sort of being designed into this product and that made it more interesting."

Jordan and Hatfield work together on the design and function on many of the Air Jordan shoes. Jordan has final say on design matters.

Air Jordan was the lightning in the bottle that every company hopes for.

Advertising images of Jordan soaring across the sky were ubiquitous. Spike Lee could be heard hollering "It's gotta be the shoes" on television. And Jordan's outstretched arms with the swoosh nearby adorned walls across the country.

Nike quickly moved from a running company and newcomer to the basketball category to the market leader. Some industry estimates put Nike's current share of the basketball shoe market at about 85 percent. Far behind are Adidas and Reebok.

The idea of adding such unusual style to a product or so closely aligning with a personality was novel at the time, but it paid off.

Other companies tried to follow suit but it was like trying to come up with the next Harry Potter or iPhone for basketball.

The relationship completely changed the idea of sports marketing. Companies now make athlete sponsorships the centerpiece of their business, spending millions signing them and designing product lines and marketing platforms around them.

Jordan's original deal seems like a pittance compared to multimillion-dollar contracts inked these days, such as Nike's $90 million agreement with LeBron James.

"The beginning of the Jordan era marked a new and more sophisticated approach to leveraging an athlete," said Paul Swangard, managing director of the Warsaw Sports Marketing Center at the University of Oregon.

Like any bet, athletic companies take their risks -- some pay off, like Tiger Woods or LeBron James. But some don't, a la Michael Vick. Nike terminated its contract with Vick last August after his plea agreement on dogfighting charges.

Jordan was spun off into its own division in 1997, a move that some high up in Nike questioned when Jordan retired.

But the business is a key component, with new players signing on under the brand. Nike has spun that Jordan swagger into performance and luxury apparel for men and woman.

The Air Jordan remains the pinnacle piece for shoe collectors. The original Air Jordan 1 can sell for thousands of dollars, depending on various factors.

Jordan said: "It blows my mind that even after five years removed from the game the shoe would be stronger than ever and I would still be greeted by fans as if I had just won a championship all over again."


Image

In a photo released by Nike Inc., the Air Jordan XX3, one of three versions to be released in the coming months, is shown. The Air Jordan XX3 will be released in three hyped-up rounds from January to February, starting with a limited edition to be sent to only 23 retailers to be sold for $230 and concluding with the national launch at $185.


http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com ... -headlines
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,582
And1: 36,930
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

 

Post#2 » by DuckIII » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:03 pm

I must be old. That shoe is hideous.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,059
And1: 4,479
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

 

Post#3 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:03 pm

U G L Y

They aint got no alibi

They ugly

What? What?

They ugly.
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston
User avatar
SkillzDatKillz
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 16, 2007

 

Post#4 » by SkillzDatKillz » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:03 pm

Eww..those are FUGLY..
Image
TB#1
Banned User
Posts: 17,483
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Location: Wossamotta U

 

Post#5 » by TB#1 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:05 pm

DuckIII wrote:I must be old. That shoe is hideous.


A lot of the Air Jordans (not all) have been hideous. Including this one.

Overly ornate basketball shoes don't do it for me.
User avatar
IbreakNeckZ101
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,870
And1: 58
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: Skokie, Illinois

 

Post#6 » by IbreakNeckZ101 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:12 pm

TB#1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



A lot of the Air Jordans (not all) have been hideous. Including this one.

Overly ornate basketball shoes don't do it for me.



Sneakerheads (Shoe collectors) would strongly disagree. I myself am a shoe collector and i can really say this shoe is a really big disappointment.
#1TKfan
General Manager
Posts: 9,519
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 06, 2006

 

Post#7 » by #1TKfan » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:12 pm

um, yeah they have run out of ideas for jordans.

i was never a fan of any of the jordan shoes. the only one i could tolerate were the 89 jordans.

Image
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,648
And1: 24,859
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#8 » by kulaz3000 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:12 pm

TB#1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

A lot of the Air Jordans (not all) have been hideous. Including this one.

Overly ornate basketball shoes don't do it for me.


Your right, alot of the Air Jordans have been quite hideous, yet it didn't stop me in the past from purchasing them regardless. Though i've grown out of that faze, i can imagine why people how have the expendable income would still buy these. Jordans have become just like any over-priced fashion item in stores, its all about the brand name. Its more a fashion item than a basketball shoe now...
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,582
And1: 36,930
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

 

Post#9 » by DuckIII » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:18 pm

I owned one pair of Air Jordans. The first ones with the black-lined toe.

I just don't get the whole thing with shelling out 180 beans for high-tops. But then again I'm a white, soft, country boy lawyer from downstate Illinois, so I doubt I'm the target demographic for spending thousands of dollars on basketball shoes.

I'd rather buy 5 bottles of Jack Daniels and a carton of smokes, and call it a day.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,648
And1: 24,859
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#10 » by kulaz3000 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:19 pm

#1TKfan wrote:um, yeah they have run out of ideas for jordans.

i was never a fan of any of the jordan shoes. the only one i could tolerate were the 89 jordans.

(picture)



Well if those are your favourites, you've obviously never seen these pair before. These are just subLIME...!

Image

Actually, those were one of my favourite pairs of Jordans. Not that color scheme of course, but the original colors of white and black.
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,648
And1: 24,859
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#11 » by kulaz3000 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:22 pm

Image
Why so serious?
Convoy
Ballboy
Posts: 30
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

 

Post#12 » by Convoy » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:25 pm

Well if those are your favourites, you've obviously never seen these pair before. These are just subLIME...!


I'm pretty sure those are fakes. :) That's like a Jordan Dub-zero and XIII mashed into one shoe.

These are the authentics in that colorway:

Image
User avatar
myboyz33
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,358
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Scottie will always be my #1

 

Post#13 » by myboyz33 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:25 pm

i have always thought air jordans were gross. minus a few syles i am sure. the ones that #1TKfan posted above are not bad at all. might be the only pair i have ever saw that i liked.

i have a pair of high top scottie pippen shoes. i just found them about a month ago after i moved. they are in great shape and are not that bad looking. they actually might have come back in style. for the life of me i cant find them anywhere online though.
Convoy
Ballboy
Posts: 30
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 17, 2006

 

Post#14 » by Convoy » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:31 pm

I love Jordans. Maybe I'm biased; I have at least 2 of every color released from 1-22. For me, when I'm working at a convention, nothing beats Jordans for support and comfort.

And, they're shiny. ;)

myboyz12, are you talking about the More Uptempos that have "AIR" on the side?

Image

I love those. The other Pippens are too plain.
#1TKfan
General Manager
Posts: 9,519
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 06, 2006

 

Post#15 » by #1TKfan » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:32 pm

myboyz12 wrote:i have always thought air jordans were gross. minus a few syles i am sure. the ones that #1TKfan posted above are not bad at all. might be the only pair i have ever saw that i liked.

i have a pair of high top scottie pippen shoes. i just found them about a month ago after i moved. they are in great shape and are not that bad looking. they actually might have come back in style. for the life of me i cant find them anywhere online though.


i had the hare jordans. lol! remember those? the air and hare jordan thing that came out w/ bugs bunny. i think they came out in 90. damn, i was only 10.
User avatar
myboyz33
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,358
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Scottie will always be my #1

 

Post#16 » by myboyz33 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:39 pm

Convoy wrote:I love Jordans. Maybe I'm biased; I have at least 2 of every color released from 1-22. For me, when I'm working at a convention, nothing beats Jordans for support and comfort.

And, they're shiny. ;)

myboyz12, are you talking about the More Uptempos that have "AIR" on the side?

(picture)

I love those. The other Pippens are too plain.



no i cannot stand those AIR ones. Mine are probably from very early 90's. they are mostly black with some red and the black part feels velvet- like material. they are soft. They have Pippen in a circle on the tongue of the shoe and 33 on the side. Maybe they also say Flight somewhere? I cant even remember where I bought them from!
#1TKfan
General Manager
Posts: 9,519
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 06, 2006

 

Post#17 » by #1TKfan » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:45 pm

kulaz3000 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




Well if those are your favourites, you've obviously never seen these pair before. These are just subLIME...!

(picture)

Actually, those were one of my favourite pairs of Jordans. Not that color scheme of course, but the original colors of white and black.


ever see that movie, tron? lol

even the barkleys are better than those.

Image
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#18 » by Cliff Levingston » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:46 pm

$180 for a pair of shoes? Man, Nike is probably making about a 1,200% profit on those.

And 1 basketball shoes = best.
#1TKfan
General Manager
Posts: 9,519
And1: 190
Joined: Jan 06, 2006

 

Post#19 » by #1TKfan » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:56 pm

Cliff Levingston wrote:$180 for a pair of shoes? Man, Nike is probably making about a 1,200% profit on those.

And 1 basketball shoes = best.


how much does cliff levingston thinks they cost to make?
TB#1
Banned User
Posts: 17,483
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Location: Wossamotta U

 

Post#20 » by TB#1 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 9:56 pm

TB#1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
A lot of the Air Jordans (not all) have been hideous. Including this one.
Overly ornate basketball shoes don't do it for me.


IbreakNeckZ101 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Sneakerheads (Shoe collectors) would strongly disagree. I myself am a shoe collector and i can really say this shoe is a really big disappointment.


I have absolutely no problem conceding the very strong possibility that my personal taste and the taste of "sneakerheads" widely differ.

Return to Chicago Bulls