Let's all part ways, come up with real plans, and regroup...
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:52 am
This is disgusting. I can't take it anymore. I firmly believe Paxson sees this the same way. I've been saying (and his comments validate it) that he told Boylan to play the vets for a while to win, and if they couldn't then he would start playing the youth. This is obviously being done as much to boost trade value as to actually win (because we're clearly not winning even with the vets). I think people should realize that whoever trades for a Wallace, etc. will be a sucker. And every 10+ rebound game he has makes him more attractive to the sucker that gets him. Unlike the other 29 teams, the sucker who trades for Wallace will forget about our record and forget about how Wallace gives up 20 and 20 to Samuel Dalembaert, etc. This is a good thing. We are loosing and trade value for BW, BG, Deng, Noc, and Smith is rising from what it was earlier this year. It's the best of both worlds once you realize that this group will never win a title as is, unless TT and Noah are way more than they look like. We NEED a good trade, at LEAST one, to reload. Let's face it, all our vets - BW, JS, BG, KH, LD, AN, CD... have more trade value if they play more minutes and put up more meaningless stats. At the same time, they be a worse chance (BW and CD at least) for us to win, so hopefully in addition to pumping trade value for those we MUST make a trade happen with, we also lose more games, get a better pick, AND IMO TT and Noah might have more trade value right now the less they play also, as I think they may not be quite what they were hyped to be. Is till like them a lot and can easily see them as out long term answers at their spots, but IF we decide to trade them, I think not playing doesn't affect their trade value, unlike the vets.
So basically these are the obvious right moves (what we're doing right now), unfortunately. Let's put our heads together, go in our individual Bat caves, and come up with real trades. I don' really want to hear anyone say we should wait until the offseason. Pax is not going to waste the whole season playing BW and CD like this. He is not going to be pigeonholed into making a move with BG or LD that he doesn't have control over. With Eddy Curry and Jamal Crawford, he thought/knew he had better options. He knows that's not the case with LD and BG. I GUARANTEE everyone on this board he will know 95% by the trade deadline whether they are in our long term plans. If he decide they are (because we either win every game between now and then, or, more likely, we make a big trade with other pieces or with one of them but no the other), he will sign them/match them at almost any realistic price (with the 5% of indecision being if they are offered the MAX, etc). If he decides either one or both are not in our long term plans, he definitely trade them.
Once the trade deadline comes we have basically decided to keep them on our team for a few years. This team is not going to get it done. Lets use this thread to offer our best solutions. Please don't include hypotheticals like drafting a certain player (we have NO idea where we will pick, likely 1-18) or signing a certain free agent, especially not in 3 years. But please say "address SG iwith our draft pick" or "pick up one of...several players who could easily be had for MLE" if that's what you think we should do.
I'm going to go work on mine. Let's get everyone's big ideas out here first and then after we can narrow it down (eliminate the virtual duplicate ideas), we can start another thread debating the merits of the legit ideas.
So basically these are the obvious right moves (what we're doing right now), unfortunately. Let's put our heads together, go in our individual Bat caves, and come up with real trades. I don' really want to hear anyone say we should wait until the offseason. Pax is not going to waste the whole season playing BW and CD like this. He is not going to be pigeonholed into making a move with BG or LD that he doesn't have control over. With Eddy Curry and Jamal Crawford, he thought/knew he had better options. He knows that's not the case with LD and BG. I GUARANTEE everyone on this board he will know 95% by the trade deadline whether they are in our long term plans. If he decide they are (because we either win every game between now and then, or, more likely, we make a big trade with other pieces or with one of them but no the other), he will sign them/match them at almost any realistic price (with the 5% of indecision being if they are offered the MAX, etc). If he decides either one or both are not in our long term plans, he definitely trade them.
Once the trade deadline comes we have basically decided to keep them on our team for a few years. This team is not going to get it done. Lets use this thread to offer our best solutions. Please don't include hypotheticals like drafting a certain player (we have NO idea where we will pick, likely 1-18) or signing a certain free agent, especially not in 3 years. But please say "address SG iwith our draft pick" or "pick up one of...several players who could easily be had for MLE" if that's what you think we should do.
I'm going to go work on mine. Let's get everyone's big ideas out here first and then after we can narrow it down (eliminate the virtual duplicate ideas), we can start another thread debating the merits of the legit ideas.