Mariotti -- Reinsdorf Fading Away as Big Loser
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:19 pm
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/mariotti ... 08.article
Reinsdorf fading away as big loser
20th-century, old-money owner is showing it's time to step aside after Bulls, Sox sputter, stagnate instead of becoming title-worthy
January 17, 2008
BY JAY MARIOTTI Sun-Times Columnist
So I see Jerry Reinsdorf has retreated to his cave. What a shock, huh? When he finally won the World Series after 25 years of trying, he amazingly transformed into The People's Owner, shaking hands and posing for pictures and answering to chants of ``Jerry! Jerry!'' But over recent months, he has returned to his previous life as The Invisible Owner, and we obviously know why.
The White Sox are awful.
The Bulls are worse.
In both cases, the teams have fallen quickly from lofty places because of, well, management messes. And let me clue you in on something that Chairman Jerry, rather comically, always has denied through his various underlings and flunkies: He IS centrally involved in every major decision made by both franchises. Which means Reinsdorf has played a significant role in why the Bulls are a dysfunctional bunch of squabbling underachievers who may employ three head coaches in a six-month period, and why the Sox have gone 109-135 and handed a five-year extension to a goofball manager since they seemingly were poised to win back-to-back titles in July 2006.
His band of supporters, which sadly includes many media jamokes who enjoy currying his favor, call him Chicago's best sports owner. I suppose if Rockford must have a tallest building and ``The View'' must have a favorite panelist, then Reinsdorf has been the city's best owner the last quarter-century. But I submit that Benny the Bull could have been the owner and watched Michael Jordan win six NBA trophies, making Reinsdorf the luckiest owner in town. And the fact the Sox have made the playoffs only four times during his ownership tenure -- he bought the team in 1981 -- tells me they're major-market slackers who fluked their way into the holy grail three years ago.
I bring this up not to badger the poor fellow, who is known to call my editors and order blog hits when he gets mad, but to point out that he might be next in the great sea change taking place in Chicago sports. For much too long, this city has been dominated by monolithic, old-money, gruff, stubborn, profit-minded sports owners stuck in the 20th century. They've controlled much of the media, abused fans and grazed like sacred cows. But last April, the Tribune Co. decided it was getting out of the baseball business, giving the Cubs a chance to win a World Series before we die. And last autumn, Blackhawks owner Bill Wirtz passed away, allowing hockey fans the novel concept of watching a home game on TV. That quickly, two of the five pro franchises were assured of fresh decision-making and new blood.
Now, might Reinsdorf be next to move aside?
Reinsdorf fading away as big loser
20th-century, old-money owner is showing it's time to step aside after Bulls, Sox sputter, stagnate instead of becoming title-worthy
January 17, 2008
BY JAY MARIOTTI Sun-Times Columnist
So I see Jerry Reinsdorf has retreated to his cave. What a shock, huh? When he finally won the World Series after 25 years of trying, he amazingly transformed into The People's Owner, shaking hands and posing for pictures and answering to chants of ``Jerry! Jerry!'' But over recent months, he has returned to his previous life as The Invisible Owner, and we obviously know why.
The White Sox are awful.
The Bulls are worse.
In both cases, the teams have fallen quickly from lofty places because of, well, management messes. And let me clue you in on something that Chairman Jerry, rather comically, always has denied through his various underlings and flunkies: He IS centrally involved in every major decision made by both franchises. Which means Reinsdorf has played a significant role in why the Bulls are a dysfunctional bunch of squabbling underachievers who may employ three head coaches in a six-month period, and why the Sox have gone 109-135 and handed a five-year extension to a goofball manager since they seemingly were poised to win back-to-back titles in July 2006.
His band of supporters, which sadly includes many media jamokes who enjoy currying his favor, call him Chicago's best sports owner. I suppose if Rockford must have a tallest building and ``The View'' must have a favorite panelist, then Reinsdorf has been the city's best owner the last quarter-century. But I submit that Benny the Bull could have been the owner and watched Michael Jordan win six NBA trophies, making Reinsdorf the luckiest owner in town. And the fact the Sox have made the playoffs only four times during his ownership tenure -- he bought the team in 1981 -- tells me they're major-market slackers who fluked their way into the holy grail three years ago.
I bring this up not to badger the poor fellow, who is known to call my editors and order blog hits when he gets mad, but to point out that he might be next in the great sea change taking place in Chicago sports. For much too long, this city has been dominated by monolithic, old-money, gruff, stubborn, profit-minded sports owners stuck in the 20th century. They've controlled much of the media, abused fans and grazed like sacred cows. But last April, the Tribune Co. decided it was getting out of the baseball business, giving the Cubs a chance to win a World Series before we die. And last autumn, Blackhawks owner Bill Wirtz passed away, allowing hockey fans the novel concept of watching a home game on TV. That quickly, two of the five pro franchises were assured of fresh decision-making and new blood.
Now, might Reinsdorf be next to move aside?