Image ImageImage Image

Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do'

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
Bull Shak
Banned User
Posts: 4,690
And1: 5
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
Location: Bahamas

Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#1 » by Bull Shak » Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:21 am

A tattoo on Michael Beasley's left shoulder reads, "Married to the game," with a picture of a basketball sitting behind a diamond ring.

Beasley, the 6-foot-8 power forward from Kansas State, is hoping for a proposal from the Bulls on draft night, which is just more than a week away on June 26.

"It would mean a lot, being the No. 1 pick, first of all," Beasley told a horde of reporters outside the Berto Center on Tuesday morning. "But then coming to a franchise with so much history and such a big legacy would mean even more."

In a scenario that reflects a long-running reality show, however, the Bulls may give their rose to someone else. Beasley's competition is Chicago native Derrick Rose, who is scheduled to begin his 48-hour visit with the team today.

MORE COVERAGE
Stories
Q&A with power forward Michael Beasley [6/17/08]
"We're cool, you know," Beasley said of his relationship with Rose, the point guard from Memphis. "We don't really compete. We're just along for the ride."

But each of the two top draft prospects has a job to do, and that's to impress the Bulls, who beat steep odds in the draft lottery to win the No. 1 pick.

Beasley went through a basketball workout Tuesday with no other players on the floor. The Bulls already were well aware that the 6-foot-8 Maryland native is a prolific scorer and rebounder.

Some concerns have been raised, though, about Beasley's past behavior. Reports that he's a troublemaker with character issues have been overblown.

But after attending five different high schools and admitting to being a prankster, some NBA teams are wondering if Beasley could be a bit of a knucklehead. The Bulls should have a good read on the 19-year-old's maturity level after a thorough group interview.

"They asked if I was crazy," Beasley joked, showing a sense of humor about his reputation. "We just sat down and talked; it wasn't really a Q&A.

"If I have character issues … sorry, I guess. I've never been asked what my character issues are. If you asked me, I wouldn't know. I like to smile. I like to see people smile. There aren't enough smiles around here."

Beasley may have attended multiple high schools, but that also means he has spent plenty of time on his own, forced to adjust to unfamiliar environments.

He first left home in eighth grade to attend Laurinburg Academy in North Carolina. Later stops included three more boarding schools, then he went a long way from home to play one season at Kansas State.

"It helped me," Beasley said. "It got me prepared for different situations and different lifestyles. I think me going away to school at such a young age helped me grow up earlier than some other guys my age. So far I think it worked out pretty well."

It's not easy for anyone to open up in the kind of environment Beasley faced outside the Berto Center on Tuesday. He was met by dozens or reporters and cameras, squeezed between a tree and a flower bed, with everyone squinting from the sun.

But Beasley managed a few interesting comments, such as when he was asked to describe himself as a basketball player.

"Hungry. An animal," he answered. "A rebounder, scorer, pretty much whatever the team needs. I never want to step on the court and be second best. That's not fun to me. I like to make everything competitive.

"I want to be the best, and I understand there's a lot of greats out there, a lot of greats that have come through this league that I have to prove it to. But it's just another challenge."

Beasley had another funny line when someone pointed out he was listed at 6-feet-10 in college, then measured 6-8¼ at the NBA predraft camp.

"It's a little disappointing to me to find out I'm actually a midget," he quipped. "But it's not a big deal to me."

Beasley averaged 26.2 points and 12.4 rebounds last winter at Kansas State. The Bulls could use a big-time scorer and post presence as much as they could a dynamic point guard. But they can only choose one, and Rose's turn to meet the Bulls begins today.


http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=209209
http://www.dabullz.com home to the Bulls' encyclopedia.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,752
And1: 2,861
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#2 » by Betta Bulleavit » Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:58 am

You have got to be kidding me!!!!

Bullshak....We all know and understand that you have a man crush on Beasley. Why do you have to keep doing this crap???
User avatar
Doofer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,654
And1: 49
Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Location: Talisay City, Philippines

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#3 » by Doofer » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:02 am

Betta Bulleavit wrote:Bullshak....We all know and understand that you have a man crush on Beasley.


Bull Shak and Beasley :cuddle
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,573
And1: 36,919
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#4 » by DuckIII » Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:58 am

Betta Bulleavit wrote:You have got to be kidding me!!!!

Bullshak....We all know and understand that you have a man crush on Beasley. Why do you have to keep doing this crap???


What crap is that? Posting an informative article about a key draft prospect's visit to the Berto?

I assume then that you will not be interested in and won't read or particupate in any threads about Rose's visit.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
Gregnice33
Analyst
Posts: 3,001
And1: 582
Joined: Apr 27, 2003
Location: Paddy's Pub
 

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#5 » by Gregnice33 » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:04 pm

I was firmly on the Rose bandwagon, but I think Beasley is the answer.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,573
And1: 36,919
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#6 » by DuckIII » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:30 pm

Gregnice33 wrote:I was firmly on the Rose bandwagon, but I think Beasley is the answer.


I was originally for Rose - very briefly - but then quickly started to prefer Beasley by a hair. Now I prefer him by quite a bit.

Unlike any other prior draft, this one has made me childish. This board is so blatantly and one-sidedly Rose (from the second the Bulls won the lottery) with so many one-liners and put-downs to advance that agenda, that its made me want Beasley all that much more. And, sadly, there's an infantile part of me that wants Beasley to be better than Rose, regardless of who drafts him, just to stick it to the many posters here who talk about it as though any preference for Beasley is laughable and indefensible.

There have been a number of substantive debates about Rose vs. Beasley that I've enjoyed. But the majority has been "LOL @ Beasley" and "OMG Rose is the TRUTH!" Its disappointing. I would have thought the quality of pre-draft discussion would have been better than it is as a general matter given the exciting and unique situation the Bulls are in.

I can't wait for the draft to come and go so that hopefully the discussion returns to a higher level of quality.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
HeavyC
Starter
Posts: 2,108
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Location: Peoria

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#7 » by HeavyC » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:38 pm

I am also coming around on Beasley. I was firmly a Rose guy and would still be thrilled with him, but you can't argue with this guy's production.
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#8 » by jax98 » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:44 pm

DuckIII wrote:I was originally for Rose - very briefly - but then quickly started to prefer Beasley by a hair. Now I prefer him by quite a bit.

Unlike any other prior draft, this one has made me childish. This board is so blatantly and one-sidedly Rose (from the second the Bulls won the lottery) with so many one-liners and put-downs to advance that agenda, that its made me want Beasley all that much more. And, sadly, there's an infantile part of me that wants Beasley to be better than Rose, regardless of who drafts him, just to stick it to the many posters here who talk about it as though any preference for Beasley is laughable and indefensible.

There have been a number of substantive debates about Rose vs. Beasley that I've enjoyed. But the majority has been "LOL @ Beasley" and "OMG Rose is the TRUTH!" Its disappointing. I would have thought the quality of pre-draft discussion would have been better than it is as a general matter given the exciting and unique situation the Bulls are in.

I can't wait for the draft to come and go so that hopefully the discussion returns to a higher level of quality.


I'm on the Rose wagon, but I absolutely agree with this.

People have been writting off Beasley since day one, and made him look like a cancer. Something that every day seems less and less likely. In fact, I think he's going to be a terrific motivator in the league with his energy and humour.

What makes me more disappointed is how we went from 9th to 1st and that still doesn't seem good enough to some people. Against all logic, if Beasley were to slip to 9th if we had that pick, there's not a soul on here who would want to pass him up. He's an incredible talent who is going to be a force in this league. IMO, he's close to a sure-thing. We're in a unique position, and regardless of who we draft, it'll be a hell of a lot better than whoever was there at 9th.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,752
And1: 2,861
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#9 » by Betta Bulleavit » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:02 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:You have got to be kidding me!!!!

Bullshak....We all know and understand that you have a man crush on Beasley. Why do you have to keep doing this crap???


What crap is that? Posting an informative article about a key draft prospect's visit to the Berto?

I assume then that you will not be interested in and won't read or particupate in any threads about Rose's visit.


I do more reading than I do posting. Thats just how it goes with me. I havnt said one word all the way up until now. The question you should be asking is what HIS response is going to be to Rose's workout. Im really not opposed to either one. To be pro-Beasley is one thing. But to constantly talk up one while continuously throwing dirt on the other is just insane to me. And quite franly Duck, if you cant see him doing that, then thats your problem to deal with because Im not the only one who has seen this. Its not about posting informative articles. Its about continuously posting articles that we have either already seen on this board, or read somewhere else.
User avatar
Chewie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,675
And1: 336
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
       

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#10 » by Chewie » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:02 pm

DuckIII wrote:Unlike any other prior draft, this one has made me childish. This board is so blatantly and one-sidedly Rose (from the second the Bulls won the lottery) with so many one-liners and put-downs to advance that agenda, that its made me want Beasley all that much more. And, sadly, there's an infantile part of me that wants Beasley to be better than Rose, regardless of who drafts him, just to stick it to the many posters here who talk about it as though any preference for Beasley is laughable and indefensible.


That's funny, Duck, because I've said I would love for Rose to stick it to us everytime we play against the Heat should we draft Beasley. And that's just going against all the rules of being a true Bulls fan. This draft can't come soon enough. Then we'll all be together again hand-in-hand again, right?

RIGHT ?!? :thinking:
Turn down for what?
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,573
And1: 36,919
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#11 » by DuckIII » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:09 pm

Chewie wrote:
DuckIII wrote:That's funny, Duck, because I've said I would love for Rose to stick it to us everytime we play against the Heat should we draft Beasley. And that's just going against all the rules of being a true Bulls fan. This draft can't come soon enough. Then we'll all be together again hand-in-hand again, right?

RIGHT ?!? :thinking:


That's because you think management would make a mistake in drafting Beasley. My feelings have been generated by the one-sided, and often silly, "discussion" that has overtaken this board since the draft lottery.

Obviously the answer to your question is no. There will be some who wanted Beasley who will revisit the inevitable Rose draft every time Beaz has a good game. I don't intend to be one of them. There are very good reasons to take Rose over Beasley, so I will try not to second guess the pick too much once it happens.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,573
And1: 36,919
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#12 » by DuckIII » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:15 pm

Betta Bulleavit wrote:The question you should be asking is what HIS response is going to be to Rose's workout.


Why? I can tell you right now it won't be favorable. He prefers Beasley.

To be pro-Beasley is one thing. But to constantly talk up one while continuously throwing dirt on the other is just insane to me.


I agree. And in addition to describing Bull Shak, you just described the majority of this board as it relates to posts favoring Rose over Beasley. Bull Shak is taking a lot of heat for his pro-Beasley agenda and some of it is deserved because of the blatant spin, but a lot of it is also because he's got the minority opinion. There are countless other posters who twist every little thing into a reason to draft Rose. No one complains when the one-sidedness and dirt throwing favors Rose, because they share that opinion.

And quite franly Duck, if you cant see him doing that, then thats your problem to deal with because Im not the only one who has seen this.


I have seen him doing it. There is no question he does it and that it is annoying at times. Now please point me to your posts of outrage in response to similar posts favoring Rose and tearing down Beasley.

Its not about posting informative articles. Its about continuously posting articles that we have either already seen on this board, or read somewhere else.


In this thread it most certainly is about posting an article. Its a brand new article, published today, with no additional commentary provided by Bull Shak.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,752
And1: 2,861
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#13 » by Betta Bulleavit » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:18 pm

As a side note, I stated in my previous post that I am not opposed to either player. However, I do have a preference and that is Rose. Not because he is head and shoulders above Beasley, but because I value Tyrus Thomas more than I do Kirk Hinrich. Since I fall in the group that believes that drafting Rose means bye bye Hinrich and drafting Beasley means bye bye Tyrus, you can see how that theory drives my preference. But I really like both guys and you arnt going to see me downgrading one because of my preference of the other.
User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,055
And1: 4,458
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#14 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:19 pm

I wouldn't be surprised if half the Beasley hate on this board is directly related to Posters frustrations with BullShak. Its like the boy who cried wolf, its hard to take anything he posts seriously - regardless of its worth.
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,573
And1: 36,919
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#15 » by DuckIII » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:23 pm

Magilla_Gorilla wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if half the Beasley hate on this board is directly related to Posters frustrations with BullShak. Its like the boy who cried wolf, its hard to take anything he posts seriously - regardless of its worth.


It started long before Bull Shak's antics.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
AirGordon
Junior
Posts: 295
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 16, 2007

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#16 » by AirGordon » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:23 pm

I am also set on Beasley. I feel that he fits onto our team better than Rose. We already have the rite pieces to put around him. Plus I feel that Beasley will have a better career in the NBA than Rose. If we take him #1 he will come in rite away and be our go to guy. If given the minutes (30-35) he should put up around 20 & 10 for the season and be rookie of the year. Where as with Rose I think it will take him a lot longer to adjust to the NBA and he will be more of a project. Beasley can possibly take us to the ECF in his rookie season. Where as Rose wont be able to do that for a few years. There will have to be more roster changes if Rose is drafted. If Beasley is the pick I say we package Gooden/Noc for a proven center, pg or a lottery pick. Freeing up the sf/pf mins for Deng, Beasley and Tyrus.

So I guess what it boils down to is that I am going for who I think fits the team best and who I feel is more of a sure thing (Beasley really seems like more of a sure thing compared to Rose) I will be happy either way I mean we have the #1 pick!! Something a lot of people (a lot of the people who are all for Rose) are taking for granted.

In the end I am pretty sure Pax will take Rose #1 because hes more stable from a mental stand point plus he will be more popular with the fans being that hes from Chicago. But like choosing TT over LMA Pax will end up regretting it IMO. Followed by everyone who was all for Rose and didnt want Beasley complaining about how we should have taken Beasley #1.
User avatar
Chewie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,675
And1: 336
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Fishhawk, F-L-A.
       

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#17 » by Chewie » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:24 pm

DuckIII wrote:
Chewie wrote:
DuckIII wrote:That's funny, Duck, because I've said I would love for Rose to stick it to us everytime we play against the Heat should we draft Beasley. And that's just going against all the rules of being a true Bulls fan. This draft can't come soon enough. Then we'll all be together again hand-in-hand again, right?

RIGHT ?!? :thinking:


That's because you think management would make a mistake in drafting Beasley. My feelings have been generated by the one-sided, and often silly, "discussion" that has overtaken this board since the draft lottery.

Obviously the answer to your question is no. There will be some who wanted Beasley who will revisit the inevitable Rose draft every time Beaz has a good game. I don't intend to be one of them. There are very good reasons to take Rose over Beasley, so I will try not to second guess the pick too much once it happens.


Oh, I'm sure I'll do the same should we pull the trigger on Beasley. Well, TRY to.

You're right, though, this board will be plenty active with members posting Beasley's numbers on a good night - especially when Rose is off his game. Isn't that what make RealGM so darn great, though? :uhoh:
Turn down for what?
bobsampson
Banned User
Posts: 3,049
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 18, 2007
Location: The crib watchin the Bulls

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#18 » by bobsampson » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:29 pm

I dont get how you could be bitter just cause the overwhelming majority of Bulls fans want Rose... The crap talkin has came from both sides not just from Rose people.. And IF we do take beasley i wont deep down hope Rose is better to say "i told you so" We are Bulls fans first right? 8 days


Rose
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,573
And1: 36,919
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#19 » by DuckIII » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:33 pm

bobsampson wrote:I dont get how you could be bitter just cause the overwhelming majority of Bulls fans want Rose...


I'm not bitter about the percentages. I fully understand and appreciate the factors that have made it so. And there are perfectly legitimate basketball reasons to prefer Rose.

But the manner in which that "overwhelming" preference has been expressed has been a real turn-off and, frankly, has made draft discussions around here pretty damn boring in a draft that should have been very, very exciting to talk about.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Betta Bulleavit
General Manager
Posts: 7,752
And1: 2,861
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Beasley wants Bulls to say 'I do' 

Post#20 » by Betta Bulleavit » Wed Jun 18, 2008 2:38 pm

DuckIII wrote:
bobsampson wrote:I dont get how you could be bitter just cause the overwhelming majority of Bulls fans want Rose...


I'm not bitter about the percentages. I fully understand and appreciate the factors that have made it so. And there are perfectly legitimate basketball reasons to prefer Rose.

But the manner in which that "overwhelming" preference has been expressed has been a real turn-off and, frankly, has made draft discussions around here pretty damn boring in a draft that should have been very, very exciting to talk about.


And this is the root of my frustration will Bull Shak's posts. Sure, there have been several others besides him, but I have noticed it more recently with him than anybody else. Everybody is going to have their opinions. However, I just cant see why anyone would be disgruntled with either one. We are going to end up with a very good player that we never thought we would get either way. So why all the damn agendas?!?!?

Return to Chicago Bulls