Page 1 of 1

Leyland's stupid lineups

Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:18 pm
by RustInPeace
Laird at 2nd.. really? So what if he had a good 2 games.. At the very least put Santiago or Worth at the 2 spot but please not our worst hitter.

This isn't just today though. When Maggs was out he put pretty much all of our worst hitters (Kelly, Raburn) at the most important part of the lineup.

I really don't see how much moving everyone up the lineup will affect the big guys. "Oh noes we get to bat earlier!! This will greatly affect how I perform and I might just be worse than our end of the bench players!!"


/rant

*edited title...i dont want to see (Please Use More Appropriate Word) at the top of the page for the next few weeks. thanks

Re: Leyland's stupid lineups

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:16 pm
by TSE
Unbelievable.

Re: Leyland's stupid lineups

Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:09 pm
by kellmellus50
i am not a fan of leyland . am i am not surprised of what he does remember he's getting old.

Re: Leyland's stupid lineups

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:08 pm
by TSE
Yeah and we are still only 1.5 games out of the division lead. Yet we aren't in the top 6 of Win Pct in the AL. Look at the standings and look at all the teams in the AL that do have a lower Win Pct. Look at how god awful those teams are. So far we are only better than the Jays and Chi-Sox that are barely over .500 along with 5 reject teams, not good for a team that has 2 rookie surprises this year to go along with Cabrera and still a fair quantity of quality pitchers. UGGGHH.

Re: Leyland's stupid lineups

Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:45 pm
by kellmellus50
We have such a bad division that the tigers could end up in first place with a little above a .500 record, right now minnys tanking.