cochiseuofm wrote:
I know you don't know what it means......that is the point. You don't have a balanced view of the Tigers, you only see the bad. You refuse to acknowledge the good deals DD has made, only ever talking about the bad ones. You refuse to give credit to Leyland or DD for turning the team around in 2006. And you never acknowledge moments like Verlander's no-hitter which all MLB fans enjoy.
Do you even like watching baseball?
Yes I love watching baseball, I watch it religiously. And I don't see only the bad, you are wrong by making another ignorant assumption. Just cause I comment on internet boards only about the bad doesn't mean I don't see the good or acknowledge it. I compliment every good move by DD on boards when we make good moves if we do, but it's extremely rare that we do, in addition to irrelevant. A GM is supposed to make good moves as routine. When a baseball player makes a routine fielding play, you don't ask for a high intellect baseball man like myself to drop what I'm doing and go on the Internet and right about the routine play, because it is expected to be routine. The only GM moves that I ever talk about are the ones that are noteworthy and it's not my fault that DD doesn't know how to trigger good moves and only bad ones. Tell him to make a great deal and then I'll say finally a great deal from DD, I'm still waiting.
I'm not interested in a team that can make 5 trades where one is good, I want 5 out of 5 good trades, but more importantly I want a WS title and setup for future dominance. What good is acknowledging any of the good things this club does if we are still rendered unqualified as a team? We are an embarrassing disaster of incredibly incompetence. This team doesn't even sniff having the right to be patted on the back for miniscule organizational victories that are outclassed and buried by the far more powerful terrible mistakes they make. You have to get out of the red to start expecting profits or compliments.
