Neddy wrote:Quake Griffin wrote:IDC about bringing Baez in.
The Mets started spitting on Kershaw's breaking stuff. A lot of people are saying, "you trust your ace." I don't subscribe to that logic. You trust your ace if you see he still has the stuff to get people out while he is in a jam. When the Mets went from swinging and missing at all the breaking stuff to spitting on damn near every one of them in the 7th, Mattingly should have known it was time based on Kershaw's stuff…especially with Granderson (who had just smoked Kershaw back up the middle) coming up.
Yes, I think the decision should have been made based on Granderson with RISP even though the TV talk seems to be about whether he should have stayed in to get Wright.
With Granderson…2 were on…2 out…free base…perfect time to bring in Howell to get him out.
Grandy Walks…you pull Kershaw…and now Baez is coming in in a much tougher, higher leverage situation rather than just putting a lefty on Granderson and seeing David Wright in the top of the 8th.
I am a firm believer that you either pull your guy early when you smell trouble, or let your guy work through his troubles. I don't get why you would let your ace load the bases with two outs then bring in a kid to close out. that is fair to neither player and it is solely on the manager to sort through these things. you let your ace work through and if he blows it, you blame yourself in post game. you pull your guy early and have him be mad at you if your decision ended up sucking but you don't put your players in unfair spot to come through for your indecision.
I feel you there.
But I was so dead set on Kershaw being pulled early as you said (or earlier) that I haven't given much thought to whether I would have let him see David Wright. I'm so convinced Howell or Avilan could have gotten Grandy that I can't even think about why Baez was in facing Wright with the bases loaded.
I guess at that point you're right, let Kershaw get Wright….but it shouldn't have gotten to that point IMO.