ImageImageImage

So Kidd is a Ca...err, Mav.

Moderator: ijspeelman

CzBoobie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,181
And1: 675
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: EU

So Kidd is a Ca...err, Mav. 

Post#1 » by CzBoobie » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:20 pm

I always thought he's gonna end up in Dallas but I still had little faith he might be a Cav after all. So now we are stuck with what we have I suppose.
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

 

Post#2 » by B Mac » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:28 pm

Theres no way the Cavs could have matched that offer, and even if they could have they shouldnt have done it. Hell of a deal for the Nets.
User avatar
FlightNo.23
Senior
Posts: 531
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 11, 2007

 

Post#3 » by FlightNo.23 » Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:50 am

Well apparently we are in the running to get Kidd along with Denver and Dallas.

Hard to believe we have any shot at all, given Dallas' offer, unless of course New Jersey gets caught up in the stellar play of Larry Hughes :)
Image
CzBoobie
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,181
And1: 675
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: EU

 

Post#4 » by CzBoobie » Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:04 am

We are in the running, but I guess it'll be either Boobie and 2 first round picks or no deal at all. I'm not really sure about giving up Boobie AND first round picks.
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

 

Post#5 » by B Mac » Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:09 pm

We flat out should not do that. It makes absolutely zero sense to trade Boobie and 2 first rounders. Absolutely zero. That kind of move sets our franchise back years again.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers