ImageImageImage

Shawn Marion

Moderator: ijspeelman

User avatar
heathmalc
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 16
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Skr Hts.

 

Post#21 » by heathmalc » Tue Mar 4, 2008 5:01 pm

andyhop wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



He is a system guy to the extent that playing with Nash made him one of the more efficient scorers in the league, whilst without Nash he still scores but nowhere near as efficiently.

Just check out his eFG% pre-Nash in Phoenix,with Nash and in Miami to see how big an effect Nash had on it.


A great point guard makes everyone more efficient.

Look at Dirk Pre Kidd and Since Kidd has been there.

That's not a "system" though, that's basketball...and the reason everyone wants a great pg...because they make everyone better.
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 1,318
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

 

Post#22 » by andyhop » Tue Mar 4, 2008 7:10 pm

heathmalc wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



A great point guard makes everyone more efficient.

Look at Dirk Pre Kidd and Since Kidd has been there.

That's not a "system" though, that's basketball...and the reason everyone wants a great pg...because they make everyone better.


The pace also picked up a lot when Nash got to the Suns and so did his efficiency and Marion also played with some pretty good PG's pre-Nash .

Obviously some is due to Nash but I think it is more due to the style that Nash enables the team to play than a large difference in quality between the PG's he played with.
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
User avatar
heathmalc
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 16
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Skr Hts.

 

Post#23 » by heathmalc » Tue Mar 4, 2008 8:03 pm

Marion has always been consistent. His defense has nothing to do with Nash or a system. His ability to rebound at a high level has nothing to do with Nash or a system. He has consistently scored about 18 points a game with or without Nash. Did the up-tempo and Nash make him more efficient? I'd think so, else why do it? But the point here is that Marion is not a "product" of any system...he is doing the same things in Miami that he has for his whole career. Less efficiency? Probably/maybe...but then again, Look at LeBron ...If he had Kid at PG and Marion at SF with him at SG, you think his efficiency might go up? Yup.
We the People...
jimmywolfrey
Rookie
Posts: 1,038
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 17, 2006

 

Post#24 » by jimmywolfrey » Tue Mar 4, 2008 8:21 pm

Baseline Runner wrote:Before Nash, Marion had Kidd running fastbreaks. The only year he was without a PG he won 29 games with Stoudamire. The last couple of years his scoring and rebounding has been dropping off despite the Suns scoring as much as ever. He was relegated to a role player expected to rebound while getting occasional transition and garbage points. Its no surprise that Miami is still losing with him.

In my opinion we need a legitimate second option to go alongside Lebron, a player that teams need to fear and focus on. We don't necessarily need a swingman to fill that roll, but it makes most sense acquiring one since we are weakest at SG and there is an abundance of scoring swingmen. My first choice would be Artest and second would be Michael Redd. Both players are still in their prime.


Before nash, Marion had Stephon Marbury... Kidd was there for Marions first two years in the league. Marion was the main player on the team for a few years before nash and Stoudamire came into their own with phoenix. Four years with Marbury to be exact.

All your logic is flawed since Phoenix was a border line playoff team with Marbury and a top 3 seed with Nash. Without Marion Phoenix has been under .500. The Nash/Marion combo was just nasty. We forget that the point guard needs players to be the point that they need to be.

Marion was not a product of the system, he actually helped the system WORK!!! His athleticism and transition baskets as well as his rebounding, defense, and open 3pointers helped the system. You all are very misinformed and have not watched his game over the years.

You could actually argue that he sacrificed his game for the betterment of Amare Stoudamire the last few years. When Nash first came Amare was still growing and Marion was the main scoring option as the team one 60 games their first year with Nash.

His defense is consistent, he gets steals, plays 1 on 1 defense very well, blocks shots on the ball and off the ball, alters shots and can defend multiple positions. His offense is pretty consistent as well with or without Nash. With marbury he averaged 19, 21, 19, 19 in the four seasons, With Kidd he averaged 17, and with Nash he averaged 19, 21, 18, 16. All this while averaged 2 or less turnovers per game in every season.
Kwame Brown is servicable, get over it.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#25 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Mar 4, 2008 8:33 pm

dang, he's played with some pretty decent PG's. Contrast that with LeBron having played with Smush, Snow, McInnis, Hughes and now Delonte.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
User avatar
heathmalc
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 16
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Skr Hts.

 

Post#26 » by heathmalc » Tue Mar 4, 2008 8:45 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:dang, he's played with some pretty decent PG's. Contrast that with LeBron having played with Smush, Snow, McInnis, Hughes and now Delonte.


Yeah, hopefully Delonte develops FAST into a top pg!!!!!!

Or Gibson...I'd be happy if either worked out!
tyguy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 980
And1: 660
Joined: Nov 08, 2003

 

Post#27 » by tyguy » Tue Mar 4, 2008 9:30 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:dang, he's played with some pretty decent PG's. Contrast that with LeBron having played with Smush, Snow, McInnis, Hughes and now Delonte.
LeBron never played with smush, smush was on the team the year before Lebron got there.

He did play with the awesome j.r. bremmer though!
jnester71
Sophomore
Posts: 157
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 30, 2007

 

Post#28 » by jnester71 » Wed Mar 5, 2008 7:08 am

do not forget....

LeBrons rookie season he had the pleasure of Kevin Ollie throwing him the alley oop
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,261
And1: 2,066
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

 

Post#29 » by Gus McCrae » Wed Mar 5, 2008 5:56 pm

Hi guys, just browsing through the forum.

Has anyone else noticed that the person of Nash and Marion who's numbers have dropped since the split is NASH!

Nash is the guy who's got significantly worse efficiency and assists since they parted. Marion hasn't dropped off, but Nash has big time. IMO, Nash could not have earned those MVP trophies without Marion, or someone similiar who could run and handle alley oops.
User avatar
heathmalc
Analyst
Posts: 3,083
And1: 16
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: Skr Hts.

 

Post#30 » by heathmalc » Wed Mar 5, 2008 7:32 pm

SoCAL24 wrote:Hi guys, just browsing through the forum.

Has anyone else noticed that the person of Nash and Marion who's numbers have dropped since the split is NASH!

Nash is the guy who's got significantly worse efficiency and assists since they parted. Marion hasn't dropped off, but Nash has big time. IMO, Nash could not have earned those MVP trophies without Marion, or someone similiar who could run and handle alley oops.


That's something I'd never even thought about, but you could be right. However, since Nash is getting pretty old, he has surely slowed down. That being the case, he needs people around him who the opposition see as a threat. Marion was most-definitely viewed as a threat, but I don't think that teams worry too much about Shaq anymore. So Nash's drop-off could be a combination of Marion leaving, Nash getting more attention, Shaq's lower-level of play, and nobody else stepping-up for the Suns.

I think that Kerr and the Suns may have thought they were deeper than they are, and they made the trade on that assumption. The REAL bad thing for phoenix fans is that the Suns had 2 other 1st rounders this year and traded those to Seattle so the Sonics would take Thomas. If the Suns had kept those picks, their future would still be bright...however...

...no need to state the obvious.
chuckerz
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,496
And1: 161
Joined: Jan 18, 2008

 

Post#31 » by chuckerz » Fri Mar 7, 2008 3:05 am

Shawn marion says he wants the max money. I don't think its going to work out having to max players on the same team. Its going to kill the cap space and theres no chance of rebuilding if marion decides to have a game like the one against the raptors the other night where he just dissapeared from the game.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#32 » by TheOUTLAW » Fri Mar 7, 2008 3:13 am

I think it can work out with 2 max players, just not if Marion is one of them. I just don't think he's worth the max.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers