TRADE #1:
To Milwaukee:
Sasha Pavlovic [2 yr @ $9.45M]
Ben Wallace [2 yr @ $28.50M]
Damon Jones [1 yr @ $4.46M]
#19 pick
08/09 trade salaries: $23.46M
09/10 trade salaries: $18.95M
Total: $42.41M
To Cleveland:
Michael Redd [3 yr @ $51.12M / player option for 10/11]
Charlie Villanueva [2 yr @ $8.07M / qualifying offer for 09/10]
Dan Gadzuric [3 yr @ $20.23M]
#37 pick
08/09 trade salaries: $25.47M
09/10 trade salaries: $28.40M [includes Villanueva
My offseason...
Moderator: ijspeelman
My offseason...
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 935
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 26, 2001
- Location: Ohio
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
I like the first deal, but Jermaine O'Neal's knee is more risk than I would want to take on. The bitter sting of Larry Hughes and how badly the 07-08 season got scuttled by injuries makes me real hesitant to bring in someone with such a lengthy, chronic innjury history.
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
- LeQuitterNotMVP
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,699
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 06, 2007
- Location: Props to Trixx for the avy!
-
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 15,184
- And1: 73
- Joined: May 21, 2006
-
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
Exile23 wrote:The first deal makes me happy. For the second deal, isn't Snow retiring?
I thought I heard Winhdorst say on WTAM that Snow will retire if he stays in Cleveland but would accept a trade to help out the Cavs in terms of salary. He is definitely never playing again though, his knees are shot. Maybe the Cavs get some sort of injury salary relief if he stays?
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
- Smooth32
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,282
- And1: 8
- Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Milwaukee gets hosed big time. Take out Charlie Villanueva, the #47 pick and change Wallace to Wally Szczerbiak and it looks about right. Otherwise, that's terrible for Milwaukee and it's not even close.
The Indiana deal actually isn't that bad but there is no way the Cavs want or need Tinsley by any stretch of the imagination--none.
Otherwise, it's great!
The Indiana deal actually isn't that bad but there is no way the Cavs want or need Tinsley by any stretch of the imagination--none.
Otherwise, it's great!