ImageImageImage

So much for Eyenga

Moderator: ijspeelman

User avatar
InBoobieWeTrust
General Manager
Posts: 8,208
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 11, 2008

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#21 » by InBoobieWeTrust » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:37 pm

Pula_86 wrote:Didn't mean to sound critical. However, the fact is that Eyenga and Green are up against some tough odds. For numerous insundary reasons, the Cavs just have not drafted all that welll overall since acquiring LBJ.


Yeah, Paxson's only really good pick was Boozer, and we all know what happened there. Paxson really screwed things up by drafting crappy players and trading away a bunch of our picks.

And sure, any player drafted is up against tough odds. We're talking about the 30th and 46th pick. Generally these picks aren't good players, but every year there are a few guys in this range that do work out. It's not just the Cavs, if anything..the Cavs have done well in the 2nd round comparably.
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#22 » by B Mac » Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:28 pm

KennerLeaguer wrote:Didn't mean to make this a back-n-forth but with all due respect I gotta say your NFL comparison is absurd. There is no way one can compare the 1st round of the NBA draft to the 5th, 6th and 7th rounds of the NFL draft. The vast majority of 1st round picks of the NBA draft actually make the roster of their teams and all get guaranteed contracts. You know this, I know this. It feels stupid to even go down this road.

But even saying that NFL teams are at least trying to find undiscovered gems in those late rounds, gems who can end up being steals and display the ability to help their respective teams IMMEDIATELY. Ah, there's the difference. The NFL teams aren't typically worrying about who has the most upside. They aren't saying to themselves that a guy who they are drafting in the first, second or even third rounds won't be able to play for them the upcoming season but "may" turn out to be really good in four years. The NFL teams are attempting to respect fans by getting dudes who can help get Ws during the season AS SOON as they put on the jerseys. The only exceptions are quarterbacks who are sometimes brought along slowly (but still will often be called upon to play in their first or second years if the veteran quarterbacks falter or fall to injury). The NBA though is full of teams who essentially disrespect the ticket buyers/consumers by wasting picks on guys they know can't help them the coming season. Whether its a college player who only played one or two years in the NCAA and needs a few more years before he is really ready or a foreign guy drafted very late in the first round, it means teams are willing to toss money at guys who can't make a true contribution for at least an entire season.

Now, I may accept the reality that that is necessary when it comes to college or foreign guys drafted early to mid first round. Those guys are the highly regarded players whom teams don't want to lose out in grabbing even if they have to wait for (hopefully) results. Its a stupid way of doing things but its part of the game now that kids don't want to stay in school for long. However there is no reason to draft foreign guys, who are nothing but projects, at the end of the first round when the same executives who make those decisions realize that college upperclassmen who can contribute quickly are still available. Considering that the majority of these foreign guys end up not playing that first season in the NBA (if ever) and go back overseas instead, it suggests NBA teams don’t care as much about immediate results. And immediate results mean that even if you draft a guy that late and expect him to not be in the top ten rotation, you at least have the player as a possible backup in case injuries pile up and/or veterans aren’t getting the job done. And who knows? Maybe that guy becomes the next Gilbert Arenas. Who wouldn’t want that type to fall in their laps at the end of the first round? But also to really get back to my original point NBA teams are also doing this in order to not pay money to a first round draft pick. Period. And if I was a season ticket holder I would be ticked off.


As for your list of the top ten players the Cavs have, not one of those guys is a tall, rangy outside shooter. Budinger and Summers may never become NBA stars but they have the potential (maybe you folks would be more excited if I use the word “upside”) to be the type of guys who can really provide a spark from the perimeter when they get hot. They are in the mode of some of the players that helped lead to the Cavs’ downfall when they faced the Magic. If you want to win now you want guys like that even if its only as the third player at a position. The two I mentioned would give the Cavs the tall shooters that the team lacks right now (unless Wally is ready to play like a true pro again). Who cares about Eyenga if he can’t help over the next 10 to 11 months? Who cares what he MAY become? If the Cavs are earning as much money as you claim they can grab him via free agency in a few years. You know, when he’s actually ready to play and help an NBA team.



NFL draft issues aside, because I agree it has nothing to do with the NBA I have a couple of points Id like to add.

First, I dont mean to make it sound like you arent right, because in a lot of ways you are. If I saw someone out there that I felt could help this team this season that we didnt draft for financial reasons, then I would be upset. Again, I just dont see that in Budinger, Summers, etc... Maybe thats where our whole disagreement is at. I would much rather use the pick on someone who could potentially be much better than anyone else available at that spot rather than someone who is better now but likely wont progress much more. A difference in opinions perhaps...

Second, you are right we didnt have tall rangy shooters last year. We did however bring in two guys that are going to help that problem considerably. Anthony Parker seems to definately fit that bill and surprisingly Jamario Moon does as well. (Look up his stats) I still would argue that both of them would be in the rotation ahead of Budinger or Summers or quite frankly anyone else available when we drafted.

I definately dont feel disrespected as a fan who buys tickets (not season tickets mind you). I would, however, feel more disrespected if we wasted money on a guarenteed contract for someone like Budinger in the first round and he never panned out and then ticket prices went up. That would be more of a slap in the face to me, in my opinion. Its just the world we live in right now. As well as the Cavs are doing financially they still cant afford to make poor financial decisions, and Im OK with that.
landphil
Sophomore
Posts: 132
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#23 » by landphil » Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:11 pm

KennerLeaguer wrote:Now, I may accept the reality that that is necessary when it comes to college or foreign guys drafted early to mid first round. Those guys are the highly regarded players whom teams don't want to lose out in grabbing even if they have to wait for (hopefully) results. Its a stupid way of doing things but its part of the game now that kids don't want to stay in school for long. However there is no reason to draft foreign guys, who are nothing but projects, at the end of the first round when the same executives who make those decisions realize that college upperclassmen who can contribute quickly are still available. Considering that the majority of these foreign guys end up not playing that first season in the NBA (if ever) and go back overseas instead, it suggests NBA teams don’t care as much about immediate results. And immediate results mean that even if you draft a guy that late and expect him to not be in the top ten rotation, you at least have the player as a possible backup in case injuries pile up and/or veterans aren’t getting the job done. And who knows? Maybe that guy becomes the next Gilbert Arenas. Who wouldn’t want that type to fall in their laps at the end of the first round? But also to really get back to my original point NBA teams are also doing this in order to not pay money to a first round draft pick. Period. And if I was a season ticket holder I would be ticked off.


As for your list of the top ten players the Cavs have, not one of those guys is a tall, rangy outside shooter. Budinger and Summers may never become NBA stars but they have the potential (maybe you folks would be more excited if I use the word “upside”) to be the type of guys who can really provide a spark from the perimeter when they get hot. They are in the mode of some of the players that helped lead to the Cavs’ downfall when they faced the Magic. If you want to win now you want guys like that even if its only as the third player at a position. The two I mentioned would give the Cavs the tall shooters that the team lacks right now (unless Wally is ready to play like a true pro again). Who cares about Eyenga if he can’t help over the next 10 to 11 months? Who cares what he MAY become? If the Cavs are earning as much money as you claim they can grab him via free agency in a few years. You know, when he’s actually ready to play and help an NBA team.


Some of the stuff you said I agreed with but it is simply not possible for the Cavs, or any team right now, to take a flier on a guy like Eyenga in free agency under even a base contract. What they can do is draft the guy, let him get some experience over in Europe where he can play day in and day out, and then retain his rights so when/if he does pan out to be a player that your team can depend on, you can sign him to a deal.

If you think NBA teams can afford to spend anything and everything on unproven players when there is a better system of retaining the rights to them and letting them get playing time in competitive leagues, then your not paying attention to the state of the league. Free agency is not what it used to be and retention of rights is the name of the game now, and your right it is simply about saving money but that is essentially the name of the game in every single industry and sport right now.

And by the way, tall shooters was not the main problem we had against Orlando last season. It was that we had no one to defend their own tall shooters. We have addressed that to a degree in Moon and Parker. I do like Budinger though, I wish we had taken him but I like Eyenga to get some experience and be ready to produce in 1-2 years.
cwas2882 wrote:I'm going to really hate myself for saying this but:

LeBron has gone Super Saiyan
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#24 » by B Mac » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:30 am

Another side note... You can believe this or not, but on another more popular Cavs message board there is a well known "insider" known as Wine & Gold who let it be known that Toronto was EXTREMELY high on Eyenga and was rather upset that we drafted him. This means two things: 1) We werent the only team that wanted him and he would have been gone not far after we drafted him and 2) We just drafted a player that a team with a target of ours (Chris Bosh) on it wanted very badly. Sounds like a perfect trade asset if that scenario presents itself.
jnester71
Sophomore
Posts: 157
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 30, 2007

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#25 » by jnester71 » Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:16 am

The whole point of the draft is to balance the power of the league.
In normal leagues they go through all the trouble of assigning a draft order in reverse order of finish so the bad teams can get better.

Allowing players who aren't even going to play to be drafted is just an additional big advantage for the better teams.
The bad teams can't waste a pick on a guy who isn't ready to play now or they'll never get better. The good teams can afford to be patient talentwise, save money in the meantime and potentially get a player much better than their draft slot. The good teams likely have more cash to do better scouting overseas and even sign the best of the non-drafted talent that should have been drafted.

In the NBA they care so little about the bad teams they go out of their way and create a lottery to get a better team the top pick.

The whole concept of balance of power and talent is lost on the NBA where there are the haves and the have nots.

No wonder the Clippers are the Clippers.
DeepFromTheQ
Ballboy
Posts: 9
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 08, 2009

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#26 » by DeepFromTheQ » Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:31 pm

All I want to say is that I like the Eyenga pick. The kid is a freak athlete, but still raw. Hes a quick learner, I heard he learned French I believe in about 60 days and that was his goal for English as well. A year or so playing in another league will be good for him...why? Because hell get to play! If he stayed in Cleveland he would sit on the bench and basically rot. This way he has a chance to develop and learn the game better.

I like that the NBA has this aspect of the draft and I think that the NFL should set up a scenario similar to this. How are the guys drafted by the Steelers or the Patriots going to get a chance to shine? Theyre kids in their early 20s playing against grown men. How do they get a chance to develop and catch up?

As for saying that the NBA draft is set to make the rich richer...not so fast. Look at the Cavs befor Lebron and look at them after. I know LBJ is different, but who knows how well these late 2nd round picks are going to play...only time will tell
thardawayfan
Freshman
Posts: 97
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 20, 2006
Contact:

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#27 » by thardawayfan » Sun Aug 2, 2009 4:07 pm

Here's a clip I uploaded to Youtube of Christian Eyenga dunking during warm ups in the VSL. He looked pretty raw during the game--it might be good for him to spend another year developing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj6_TTlNaTc
Douglar!
Junior
Posts: 457
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 27, 2005

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#28 » by Douglar! » Sun Aug 2, 2009 11:44 pm

KennerLeaguer wrote:DeJuan Blair, DaJuan Summers, Chase Budinger, Sam Young, Meeks were more ready for the NBA than Eyenga.


I disagree that this move was all about saving money. I think it was all about trying to get a player that would actually be able to compete at a high level in the NBA some day. Any shmoe can turn a late first round pick into a player that is "NBA ready" and ends up spending a 5 year career as a fringe 14th man on an NBA roster. That doesn't improve a team though the draft though.

Sam Young, Chase Budinger and Jodie Meeks are not exactly high ceiling players in my opinion. If the Cavs just wanted to draft a wing that is NBA ready, they could do that with the 46th pick, which they did.

DeJuan Blair and DaJuan Summers might be a little better but they were going to compete with Hickson and Jackson. That was only going to create a log jam at the spot for the 4th or 5th big man. Cavs are going to let Hickson and Jackson work at earning their pay for another season before drafting to replace them. And that's before discussing DeJuan Blair's long term durability question.

Eyenga looks like he has a significantly higher long term potential than any of the guards that came after him in the draft and the Cavs actually did try to sign him this year, so they would have paid the kid if he wanted to come to the US now. While the "saving money" argument might be true for some teams, it really wasn't what was going on here.

Let's hope Eyenga improves enough in Spain this year where he can get playing time with the Cavs in 2010-11 but not so much that Europe offers him enough money to make rookie scale unattractive.
penzias
Senior
Posts: 610
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: So much for Eyenga 

Post#29 » by penzias » Tue Aug 4, 2009 6:45 pm

mg wrote:I
Hope it's not another Tiago Splitter situation where the buyout is too big to bring him back over in a few years.

Actually Splitter finished his previous contract last summer so he could have joined the Spurs without paying any buyout but the question is that the new contract Tau Vitoria (his team in Spain) offered him was 3x what he'd earn in the NBA as a rookie. Other players, like Rudy Fernandez for example, decided to go to the NBA refusing bigger offers from Europe as an investment for the future, hoping that when they finish their rookie contract will sign for much more money that they'd earn in Europe but you can't blame the ones who didin't.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers