ImageImageImage

Trade Ideas

Moderator: ijspeelman

Pula_86
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 06, 2009

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#101 » by Pula_86 » Tue Jun 8, 2010 3:40 pm

heathmalc wrote:
Triumph36 wrote:That would push LeBron out the door....I'd rather not have that happen.

ETA: And that deal is awful for the Hornets and I still don't buy the crap about Philly trading #2/Brand.
BOTH of those trades suck big-time for the Cavs! I know everyone is high on Collison because the media played him up a lot...

Collison is a horrid defender...which we already have in Mo.... and amazingly, he is even smaller than Mo! Collison also has a very small sample size to judge him by, whereas Mo has been doing the same things for 7 straight years. Nothing against Collison, but since all he is going to bring is scoring, with a worse handle... and a decent chance at having a sophomore slump... then I'd just assume hold onto Mo, and keep the pick, and not have to woorry about Peja... yet another old player, that "used" to be good!

As for the Philly trade - ARE YOU KIDDING ME?????

There is no guarantees with Turner! I'd be more inclined to take on Brand if it was for John Wall. But Dalembert AND Brand???????????????????????????? AND we give up Hickson?????? NO thank you!!!!!!


So these are bad trades, but unrealistic trades with Toronto that involve players the Raptor do not care about makes sense. Of all the trade options, Cleveland has no assets the Raptors are interested in for Bosh.

I love how you say there are no guarantees with Turner and turn around and say "AND we give up Hickson" like he has proven to be some superstar. All he has shown is that he can be a role player on this team. I love Hickson's energy, but at times his defensive effort is inconsistent and I have serious doubts about whether he can ever turn into anytime of legitimate offensive threat. If you are afraid to make a move because a player may not work out then you might as well do nothing. There are risks associated with getting any player, especially a Bosh or Amare.

The NO trade absolutely makes sense for both teams. The Hornets ownership does not want to pay the luxury tax for a team that is not a real contender for an NBA title. Moreover, Collison plays the same position as Chris Paul. You are way off against the Collison's defensive ability. With Paul out Collison was asked to be a scorer and that's what he did. To compare Collison to Mo Williams, one of the worst defenders in the NBA is laughable. It didn't matter who we played in the playoffs, Mo Williams was such a bad defender we had to hide him. At UCLA, Collision was more of a defensive minded player. I have no doubt he will develop into a better defender when he is not asked to do so much.

In both the Philadelphia and NO trade, Peja and Dalembert's contract expire after next season. They are not a centerpiece of the trade, but a way to entice Philadelphia and New Orleans to trade younger players. There is no way around a bad Brand contract, but that is why the Cavs would offer what is really their best asset, an owner with deep pockets willing to build a winner. These trades for the Cavs are a no brainer and ensure the Cavs have a future if LBJ decides to leave. How anyone could overvalue the talent on our roster after seeing their performance in the playoffs is beyond me. Being exposed in the playoffs is not conducive to raising your trade value.
tidho
General Manager
Posts: 9,619
And1: 3,160
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#102 » by tidho » Tue Jun 8, 2010 4:21 pm

Pula_86 wrote:How anyone could overvalue the talent on our roster after seeing their performance in the playoffs is beyond me. Being exposed in the playoffs is not conducive to raising your trade value.

Couple thoughts...

1) The Celtics' continued success is an indication that the Cavaliers may not have been 'exposed' as much as originally though.
2) The system plays a role. Jamison didn't just forget how to score two thirds of the way through the season after being able to score at will sinse grade school.
3) The playoff failure rests on LeBron's hands. The offense is designed to run through him nearly exclusively and for whatever reason he just stopped playing. How many times did he just swing the ball around the perimeter every time he touched it during the regular season?

Williams, Andy, and Jamison are quality proven starters in this league, Hickson has shown flashes and has upside, West's contract is extremely valuable, and we have a host of other solid role players and expirings. The Cavalier's have the assets to get some things done.
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 2,527
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#103 » by mcfly1204 » Tue Jun 8, 2010 4:43 pm

I am still a proponent of bringing in a coach that will install a legit offense. I am not saying that we need to take the ball out of LeBron's hands, but the PG should be initiating the play, even if that means the first pass is typically going to LeBron. LeBron can and will be Cleveland's main play maker, but this will allow him to do that within 18 feet of the hoop, as opposed to pounding the ball at the top of the arc, without letting the opposing defense get set and lock in. I also agree that Mo, Jamison, and Varejao are legit pieces, and that we would see more from them if we were running a more traditional offense. Mo is a catch and shoot player, both Varejao and Jamison are great at moving without the basketball, all three of which can be utilized with LeBron in the PnR. That being said, if we have an opportunity to pickup a legit number two without gutting our roster, I am on board. I repeat though, changes need to start with the coach/offensive system.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
ClubLakers KB8
Starter
Posts: 2,105
And1: 624
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#104 » by ClubLakers KB8 » Tue Jun 8, 2010 6:21 pm

Orlando trades: Rashard Lewis (19,573,711) and Vince Carter (17,522,375)
Orlando receives: Gilbert Arenas (17,730,694), Antawn Jamison (13,358,905) and Delonte West (4,500,000)

Washington trades: Gilbert Arenas (17,730,694)
Washington receives: Rashard Lewis (19,573,711)

Cleveland trades: Antawn Jamison (13,358,905) and Delonte West (4,500,000)
Cleveland receives: Vince Carter (17,522,375)
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 2,527
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#105 » by mcfly1204 » Tue Jun 8, 2010 6:24 pm

Cleveland wants nothing to do with Vince Carter.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#106 » by TheOUTLAW » Tue Jun 8, 2010 6:47 pm

I have no idea why people think that the Cavs would be interested in Vince Carter. Heck, the Cavs biggest problem is not having enough players that show up in the playoffs, why would they just trade for another one?
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
tidho
General Manager
Posts: 9,619
And1: 3,160
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#107 » by tidho » Tue Jun 8, 2010 6:49 pm

ClubLakers KB8 wrote:Orlando trades: Rashard Lewis (19,573,711) and Vince Carter (17,522,375)
Orlando receives: Gilbert Arenas (17,730,694), Antawn Jamison (13,358,905) and Delonte West (4,500,000)

Washington trades: Gilbert Arenas (17,730,694)
Washington receives: Rashard Lewis (19,573,711)

Cleveland trades: Antawn Jamison (13,358,905) and Delonte West (4,500,000)
Cleveland receives: Vince Carter (17,522,375)


I like this for Orlando and Washington. I don't see the motivation for Cleveland. If we wanted Carter, we'd already have him. Needs to be sweetened.
User avatar
mcfly1204
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 2,527
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#108 » by mcfly1204 » Tue Jun 8, 2010 7:00 pm

What the OP neglected to mention is that this trade is assuming LeBron signs elsewhere, i.e., saving Cleveland $7+ million.
Well at least we're not Detroit!
User avatar
Gordon Bombay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,227
And1: 79
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
Location: Thanks Baron!

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#109 » by Gordon Bombay » Tue Jun 8, 2010 9:07 pm

would these two trades work?

mo, delonte, telfair, hickson and green to memphis for conley and randolph - i doubt memphis does this but it could give them more money to sign gay

jamison to charlotte for chandler - jamison gives charlotte more scoring, chandler gives us some center depth

mle should go to a center like przybilla (if he opts out), jo (unlikely) or haywood (very unlikely)
or divided for minute-filling centers like kwame brown, brian skinner, etan thomas, etc or some further depth in the backcourt

pg conley/gibson
sg parker/moon
sf james/williams
pf randolph/varejao/powe
c przybilla/chandler (varejao would play most of the minutes)
User avatar
gflem
Analyst
Posts: 3,072
And1: 281
Joined: Sep 11, 2004

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#110 » by gflem » Tue Jun 8, 2010 10:28 pm

Pryzbilla may not even play next season due to his injury. I still dont like Randolph, and Conley being expendable in Memphis says a lot about his game. Randolph can score and rebound, and while you need those type of players, he still is a potential problem in the locker room and off the court in general. One season of being a good guy in Memphis doesnt really mean much to me.
Is Conley better that Gibson? I really think Gibson got the shaft last year, he played well in place of Mo, but then rusted on the bench when Mo got back. (edit, didnt see Mo in the trade at first)
tidho
General Manager
Posts: 9,619
And1: 3,160
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#111 » by tidho » Wed Jun 9, 2010 12:41 pm

Gordon Bombay wrote:would these two trades work?

mo, delonte, telfair, hickson and green to memphis for conley and randolph...
jamison to charlotte for chandler...
mle should go to a center like przybilla...


I don't think the first trade is good value for the Cavaliers.
I like the idea of the second one.
Indifferent on Przy - we don't have to have a slow lumbering center on the court, lol.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,124
And1: 6,866
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#112 » by DirtyDez » Thu Jun 10, 2010 6:23 am

I'd be fine with Amare going to the Cavs only if we'd get Hickson. Only problem is we don't want Jamison so that kinda screws over Cleveland. Don't see Amare/Jamison playing together. Cavs could make it a 3 way with Jamison being moved somewhere else.

Maybe...

Cavs get: Amare, Jefferson

Spurs get: Jamsion, West, Moon

Suns get: Hickson, Splitter, Anthony Parker, 2011 1st
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#113 » by TheOUTLAW » Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:51 pm

The Suns get too much and whichever team if giving up that 1st is giving up too much
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
Baseline Runner
Analyst
Posts: 3,305
And1: 1,067
Joined: Aug 11, 2004
       

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#114 » by Baseline Runner » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:25 am

How about we trade for Collison from the Hornets. We would have to take on a bad contract in either Okafor or Peja but we'd get a young promising PG to play next to Lebron.
Skip2MY
Sophomore
Posts: 205
And1: 19
Joined: Jan 23, 2010

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#115 » by Skip2MY » Sun Jun 13, 2010 11:09 am

If you told me we can get Bosh somehow then I would definately do a Mo Williams/Delonte West for Okafor/Collison/1st possibly a 3way so they forward Mo somewhere else... And then I could see those rumors about going after Redick....

Collison/ Gibson
Redick/ Parker
Lebron/ Moon
Bosh/ Varajao
Okafor/ Z
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,639
And1: 3,958
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#116 » by panthermark » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:02 pm

Bulls fan here....one simple trade broken into two parts trade to work under the CBA. This assumes Bron is heading to Chicago regardless.

Part one:
Bron and Parker to Chicago for a TPE and Chicago's 2011 first rounder.

Part two:
Luol Deng for Jamison



I know a lot of Cavs fans do not want to take Deng on if Bron leaves (time for tank mode), but if Jamison and Parker are off the books, it make make more sense...and Cleveland gets a lot younger.

Something to think about....
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#117 » by TheOUTLAW » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:55 pm

I'd want Chicago's 2010, 2012 and 2014 first rounders
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
B Mac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,733
And1: 540
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#118 » by B Mac » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:31 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:I'd want Chicago's 2010, 2012 and 2014 first rounders



...and first born babies.
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#119 » by TheOUTLAW » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 pm

Nah, not a big fan of babies

Well if that is somehow beyond what you think as practical, I'd say whomever the Bulls take this year along with their 2011 and 2013 picks.

Normally teams get a veteran as well as a young player and 2 picks. I don't think this is at all out of reality.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 21,639
And1: 3,958
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Trade Thread 

Post#120 » by panthermark » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:39 am

TheOUTLAW wrote:Nah, not a big fan of babies

Well if that is somehow beyond what you think as practical, I'd say whomever the Bulls take this year along with their 2011 and 2013 picks.

Normally teams get a veteran as well as a young player and 2 picks. I don't think this is at all out of reality.


I don't think the Bulls would give up the #17 pick this year. I'm actually the only Bulls fan that likes this deal.

The big prize here is Bron...so it would really come down to where he wants to go. If he is OK going to Chicago as is...the Bulls can sign him without giving up anything. That means that you are basically asking for 3 to 4 first round draft picks in a deal that swaps Deng for Jamison and Parker.
I don't think that would happen....mostly because....while the Bulls would like to get a PF...the Cavs (minus Bron) would be stuck with several players in their mid-30's on team that is now in tank mode and will be very lucky to win 30 games. They are going to want out. That means a buy-out for Parker (so he can sign with another team) and hoping you can find a team that will take Jamsion off your hands with a new CBA looming.


If Bron went to NY instead of Chicago....and you got nothing in return. Are you saying you that if the Bulls still offered you Deng for Jamison and Parker....you would still want several first round picks? Does that not seem a bit far-fetched?

Jamison turned 34 yesterday (June 12th), Parker turns 35 this week (June 19th)...you are not going to get that kind of value for those guys.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers