jbk1234 wrote:Okay, but that was true when Garland was playing without Sexton as well and the margins for the losses actually shrunk. I agree with John that the Cavs need more NBA talent at the backup guard positions, both of them, so the Cavs can run different lineups.toooskies wrote:jbk1234 wrote:I don't think you can draw that conclusion from the available data. If you want to say that there isn't enough data fine, but this is where Sexton proponents want to have it both ways. He's almost always on the court with the starters, but when he's not, you're not seeing a net loss in terms of margins. If anything, the data suggests that the games are actually closer when he's out and Garland still starts.
Now there can be a number of reasons for this over a small sample size, but if that's happening when your leading scorer is off the court, it's worth asking why, and perhaps even forcing the issue of a larger sample size.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
The problem is that Okoro was always on the court with the starters too, and he was one of the worst offensive players in basketball this year.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Are you throwing out all the games where the team was clearly tanking at the end of the season when doing that? Our end-of-season lineups were brutal. Brodric Thomas played 34 minutes against the Pacers!
Also, when your team has no functional point guards on the floor, it's worse than when you don't have a functional SG. You don't need a star there, but you at least need a Tyus Jones or TJ McConnell or a younger version of Delly to initiate. When Sexton moves out of position and has to do that, he definitely plays worse.