ImageImageImage

DG to the Pacers - what would it take?

Moderator: ijspeelman

jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#21 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 4:44 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
When either of them is playing well enough that it'd be worth trading them, we'll want to keep them.

In a few years when we have a better idea of their ceiling? sure, but other than that it'd take a big trade that makes all our pieces fit, gets one of them out of the way for someone else, or a trade demand.
We'll see I guess, but I worry about an approach where you're financially committing to a backcourt that's undersized where both of them appear to be second options on a good team.

By the time you're 100% convinced as to their ceilings, everyone else will be as well.


And that's what makes building through the lottery so much fun ... if you overpay you may end up with dead weight you can't trade, if you refuse to pay you lose an asset for nothing, if you trade you risk ending up with a bad return, and if you underpay you risk alienating the player and eventually losing him.

Trading Milwaukee's unprotected pick for Allen when it looks like it's going to be late first rounder was a no-brainer, but that was still apparently the best Houston/Philly could get for him (and move Prince too). Sure team's don't like investing in the C position, but that doesn't stop teams taking C's in the top-5 year after year that *might* end up being better than Allen.


I think Allen will be a top 3 center within a couple years. Depending on how you feel about KAT and Gobert, I think there's an argument that he's already there. But the circumstances surrounding that trade were ideal for the Cavs and I'm not sure using that as a bench mark for value is a good predictor.

I'm 100% okay with running the risk of alienating a player by not offering an extension you don't have to offer them - especially within the RFA context. If you're not certain the guy is a max player, then there's no good reason for a team to make that financial commitment before they have to. Owners negotiating for that advantage via the CBA and then just surrendering it because derp, hurt feelings, is the greatest trick agents have ever pulled.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 4,959
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#22 » by JonFromVA » Mon Mar 1, 2021 7:39 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:We'll see I guess, but I worry about an approach where you're financially committing to a backcourt that's undersized where both of them appear to be second options on a good team.

By the time you're 100% convinced as to their ceilings, everyone else will be as well.


And that's what makes building through the lottery so much fun ... if you overpay you may end up with dead weight you can't trade, if you refuse to pay you lose an asset for nothing, if you trade you risk ending up with a bad return, and if you underpay you risk alienating the player and eventually losing him.

Trading Milwaukee's unprotected pick for Allen when it looks like it's going to be late first rounder was a no-brainer, but that was still apparently the best Houston/Philly could get for him (and move Prince too). Sure team's don't like investing in the C position, but that doesn't stop teams taking C's in the top-5 year after year that *might* end up being better than Allen.


I think Allen will be a top 3 center within a couple years. Depending on how you feel about KAT and Gobert, I think there's an argument that he's already there. But the circumstances surrounding that trade were ideal for the Cavs and I'm not sure using that as a bench mark for value is a good predictor.

I'm 100% okay with running the risk of alienating a player by not offering an extension you don't have to offer them - especially within the RFA context. If you're not certain the guy is a max player, then there's no good reason for a team to make that financial commitment before they have to. Owners negotiating for that advantage via the CBA and then just surrendering it because derp, hurt feelings, is the greatest trick agents have ever pulled.


top-3? I don't think so. Not if Jokic and Embiid are still in the league, and guys like Anthony Davis can swing over there when they feel like it, and then there's the other young C's like Ayton and Wiseman. But still ... terrific value for what appears to be a late pick. A lot of deals of that nature are being in the right place at the right time and having a way and the will to absorb salary.

As much as we might like to see them take a hard line, the Cavs are going to bend over backwards not to upset players and/or agents because there are repercussions. Hopefully negotiations go smoothly and we simply don't have to max players that don't deserve it; but I'm not counting on it.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#23 » by Stillwater » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:04 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
Garland is worth more to us than another team as we've already invested 2 years in his development and teams are very guarded with their own lottery picks. Supposedly the Cavs turned down Steph and Klay for Kyrie. The hope of that potential is overwhelmingly strong.
when was this? lol GSW would not have made that kind of ludicrous offer imo /has to be bs
IF the cavs are as high on dg as you seem to be you are right they wouldnt trade him for Cade or Kuminga...and theyd be fools not too


My point was the opposite ... no team is going to offer us a Cade or Kuminga for Garland even if he was playing like you wished he was.

I couldn't find a link to backup the rumor directly, but there was this one that says the Warriors were actively shopping the pair around in 2011 for CP3 and others:

https://www.radio.com/957thegame/articles/golden-state-warriors/warriors-tried-to-trade-steph-and-klay-for-cp3-in-2011

DG isnt worth more to the Cavs then everyone else ,in fact I'd say with Sexton on the same roster he is more expendable without significant gains over the course of the season and unfortunately probably next season too. I get wanting to see if a player you drafted can turn it around but at some point you have to cut ties and let somebody else learn what you are already anticipating to happen which is he is not going to be much more than he is other than becoming even smarter with his decisions. You cant teach what he lacks physically is my point...he cant be the starting guard on a contender in the playoffs because he will get destroyed and game planned against due to his defense and the problem is even worse with a smaller guard sharing the back court with him, but is clearly a cut above him as a 2 way player and worth retaining more. Teams that try to build around such guards usually fail to reach their goals but trying to utilize 2 other than during a tank campaign is fools gold
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#24 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:15 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
And that's what makes building through the lottery so much fun ... if you overpay you may end up with dead weight you can't trade, if you refuse to pay you lose an asset for nothing, if you trade you risk ending up with a bad return, and if you underpay you risk alienating the player and eventually losing him.

Trading Milwaukee's unprotected pick for Allen when it looks like it's going to be late first rounder was a no-brainer, but that was still apparently the best Houston/Philly could get for him (and move Prince too). Sure team's don't like investing in the C position, but that doesn't stop teams taking C's in the top-5 year after year that *might* end up being better than Allen.


I think Allen will be a top 3 center within a couple years. Depending on how you feel about KAT and Gobert, I think there's an argument that he's already there. But the circumstances surrounding that trade were ideal for the Cavs and I'm not sure using that as a bench mark for value is a good predictor.

I'm 100% okay with running the risk of alienating a player by not offering an extension you don't have to offer them - especially within the RFA context. If you're not certain the guy is a max player, then there's no good reason for a team to make that financial commitment before they have to. Owners negotiating for that advantage via the CBA and then just surrendering it because derp, hurt feelings, is the greatest trick agents have ever pulled.


top-3? I don't think so. Not if Jokic and Embiid are still in the league, and guys like Anthony Davis can swing over there when they feel like it, and then there's the other young C's like Ayton and Wiseman. But still ... terrific value for what appears to be a late pick. A lot of deals of that nature are being in the right place at the right time and having a way and the will to absorb salary.

As much as we might like to see them take a hard line, the Cavs are going to bend over backwards not to upset players and/or agents because there are repercussions. Hopefully negotiations go smoothly and we simply don't have to max players that don't deserve it; but I'm not counting on it.


This is exactly what I'm talking about. The risks of alienating agents and/or players by not paying the player early are greatly overstated. The rewards for doing so are mostly fictional. No player is going to do what Noel did again. He'll never make that money up. Not in his entire career. The next player coming off a rookie contract to turn down a 5 year max from his current team in RFA will be the first player to do so in the history of the league. It's pretty wild how a $100M smooths over hurt feelings.

What goodwill did the Cavs get from JR, TT, and LBJ for playing that game? JR said you can send me home and pay me $16M not to play, but I'm not taking a buyout his last year. After getting that ridiculous contract from the Cavs the first time, TT said I'll extend in Cleveland but only for the max. Dude is playing on the MLE right now and it's not clear that he's viewed as worth it around the league. LBJ signed a series of one-and-one deals here, and as soon as he landed in L.A., he signed a multi-year deal so other FAs would know he wasn't going anywhere.

The two most important factors in being able to sign a player in F.A. are (1) winning; and (2) money. If you can provide those two things, you've got a shot. If you can't, goodwill with an agent isn't getting you anything. You're far more likely to be able to provide those things if you don't manage your cap effectively. Frankly, at least half the recruiting is done player-to-player these days anyway.

The Mavs have played the goodwill game with agents for over a decade and the last big FA signing they had was DAJ, who agreed to a contract and then backed out before the signing date. His agent was so pissed he quit but that didn't stop DAJ from re-signing with the Clippers.

Danny Ainge traded IT after the guy played hurt and on the heels of him playing immediately after his own sister's funeral in the playoffs. It was considered the heart and soul of the team at the time. How was Ainge punished, by Kemba Walker spurning the Mavs and signing with the Celtics the following season.

Players and agents aren't dumb. They know that signing with a team whose books are a mess is the road to perdition. The Knicks and Bulls haven't gotten a serious look from a blue chip FA in forever. Their reward for failing to to manage their cap well is basically being viewed as a last resort where players only sign if the team is offering 150% of market value. The relationship thing is basically a marketing ploy at this point and sports journalists are more than happy to credulously go along with it, but that doesn't make it any more real.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 4,959
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#25 » by JonFromVA » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:16 pm

Stillwater wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
Stillwater wrote: when was this? lol GSW would not have made that kind of ludicrous offer imo /has to be bs
IF the cavs are as high on dg as you seem to be you are right they wouldnt trade him for Cade or Kuminga...and theyd be fools not too


My point was the opposite ... no team is going to offer us a Cade or Kuminga for Garland even if he was playing like you wished he was.

I couldn't find a link to backup the rumor directly, but there was this one that says the Warriors were actively shopping the pair around in 2011 for CP3 and others:

https://www.radio.com/957thegame/articles/golden-state-warriors/warriors-tried-to-trade-steph-and-klay-for-cp3-in-2011

DG isnt worth more to the Cavs then everyone else ,in fact I'd say with Sexton on the same roster he is more expendable without significant gains over the course of the season and unfortunately probably next season too. I get wanting to see if a player you drafted can turn it around but at some point you have to cut ties and let somebody else learn what you are already anticipating to happen which is he is not going to be much more than he is other than becoming even smarter with his decisions. You cant teach what he lacks physically is my point...he cant be the starting guard on a contender in the playoffs because he will get destroyed and game planned against due to his defense and the problem is even worse with a smaller guard sharing the back court with him, but is clearly a cut above him as a 2 way player and worth retaining more. Teams that try to build around such guards usually fail to reach their goals but trying to utilize 2 other than during a tank campaign is fools gold


"at some point" ... hey, at least I agree with one thing you typed.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#26 » by Stillwater » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:25 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
I think Allen will be a top 3 center within a couple years. Depending on how you feel about KAT and Gobert, I think there's an argument that he's already there. But the circumstances surrounding that trade were ideal for the Cavs and I'm not sure using that as a bench mark for value is a good predictor.

I'm 100% okay with running the risk of alienating a player by not offering an extension you don't have to offer them - especially within the RFA context. If you're not certain the guy is a max player, then there's no good reason for a team to make that financial commitment before they have to. Owners negotiating for that advantage via the CBA and then just surrendering it because derp, hurt feelings, is the greatest trick agents have ever pulled.


top-3? I don't think so. Not if Jokic and Embiid are still in the league, and guys like Anthony Davis can swing over there when they feel like it, and then there's the other young C's like Ayton and Wiseman. But still ... terrific value for what appears to be a late pick. A lot of deals of that nature are being in the right place at the right time and having a way and the will to absorb salary.

As much as we might like to see them take a hard line, the Cavs are going to bend over backwards not to upset players and/or agents because there are repercussions. Hopefully negotiations go smoothly and we simply don't have to max players that don't deserve it; but I'm not counting on it.


This is exactly what I'm talking about. The risks of alienating agents and/or players by not paying the player early are greatly overstated. The rewards for doing so are mostly fictional. No player is going to do what Noel did again. He'll never make that money up. Not in his entire career. The next player coming off a rookie contract to turn down a 5 year max from his current team in RFA will be the first player to do so in the history of the league. It's pretty wild how a $100M smooths over hurt feelings.

What goodwill did the Cavs get from JR, TT, and LBJ for playing that game? JR said you can send me home and pay me $16M not to play, but I'm not taking a buyout his last year. After getting that ridiculous contract from the Cavs the first time, TT said I'll extend in Cleveland but only for the max. Dude is playing on the MLE right now and it's not clear that he's viewed as worth it around the league. LBJ signed a series of one-and-one deals here, and as soon as he landed in L.A., he signed a multi-year deal so other FAs would know he wasn't going anywhere.

The two most important factors in being able to sign a player in F.A. are (1) winning; and (2) money. If you can provide those two things, you've got a shot. If you can't, goodwill with an agent isn't getting you anything. You're far more likely to be able to provide those things if you don't manage your cap effectively. Frankly, at least half the recruiting is done player-to-player these days anyway.

The Mavs have played the goodwill game with agents for over a decade and the last big FA signing they had was DAJ, who agreed to a contract and then backed out before the signing date. His agent was so pissed he quit but that didn't stop DAJ from re-signing with the Clippers.

Danny Ainge traded IT after the guy played hurt and on the heels of him playing immediately after his own sister's funeral in the playoffs. It was considered the heart and soul of the team at the time. How was Ainge punished, by Kemba Walker spurning the Mavs and signing with the Celtics the following season.

Players and agents aren't dumb. They know that signing with a team whose books are a mess is the road to perdition. The Knicks and Bulls haven't gotten a serious look from a blue chip FA in forever. Their reward for failing to to manage their cap well is basically being viewed as a last resort where players only sign if the team is offering 150% of market value. The relationship thing is basically a marketing ploy at this point and sports journalists are more than happy to credulously go along with it, but that doesn't make it any more real.

this is why I think Dre does not take a buyout either...he will never get that paycheck again and taking a buyout is not in his best interest at all.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#27 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:25 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
Garland is worth more to us than another team as we've already invested 2 years in his development and teams are very guarded with their own lottery picks. Supposedly the Cavs turned down Steph and Klay for Kyrie. The hope of that potential is overwhelmingly strong.
when was this? lol GSW would not have made that kind of ludicrous offer imo /has to be bs
IF the cavs are as high on dg as you seem to be you are right they wouldnt trade him for Cade or Kuminga...and theyd be fools not too


My point was the opposite ... no team is going to offer us a Cade or Kuminga for Garland even if he was playing like you wished he was.

I couldn't find a link to backup the rumor directly, but there was this one that says the Warriors were actively shopping the pair around in 2011 for CP3 and others:

https://www.radio.com/957thegame/articles/golden-state-warriors/warriors-tried-to-trade-steph-and-klay-for-cp3-in-2011


I think the point is to add Garland or Sexton to our pick to go up and get one of those guys. My strong preference would be to offer Sexton. Stillwater's strong preference would be to offer Garland. But it's really going to be dependent on who the team picking in that slot prefers, assuming that team is willing to trade the pick at all.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#28 » by Stillwater » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:36 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
Stillwater wrote: when was this? lol GSW would not have made that kind of ludicrous offer imo /has to be bs
IF the cavs are as high on dg as you seem to be you are right they wouldnt trade him for Cade or Kuminga...and theyd be fools not too


My point was the opposite ... no team is going to offer us a Cade or Kuminga for Garland even if he was playing like you wished he was.

I couldn't find a link to backup the rumor directly, but there was this one that says the Warriors were actively shopping the pair around in 2011 for CP3 and others:

https://www.radio.com/957thegame/articles/golden-state-warriors/warriors-tried-to-trade-steph-and-klay-for-cp3-in-2011


I think the point is to add Garland or Sexton to our pick to go up and get one of those guys. My strong preference would be to offer Sexton. Stillwater's strong preference would be to offer Garland. But it's really going to be dependent on who the team picking in that slot prefers, assuming that team is willing to trade the pick at all.

I find it funny how much value some people place in career long projected 1 way floor generals if you want to say DG is that[a floor general],because he obviously needs elite defenders around him that also are elite scorers to make up for his lack of scoring ability and lack of defensive ability.
DG despite obviously being coached to find teammates despite his dribbling in circles instead of running plays etc...is not worth more as is than Sexton who as of now is by far the better scorer and so if you would rather keep the guy who makes his teammates better but cant even get to the stripe or play through contact instead then he better be able to get stops to make up for all those gimmies he aint getting. DG is not the level of athlete I want the Cavs to have as a starter in a playoff setting IDC how skilled he is offensively.
I would love to keep him on the bench but Klutch will con some org into overpaying him before they realize thats who he is like they do so many that are interested in regular season stat clowns and it will probably be the Cavs
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#29 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 8:53 pm

Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
My point was the opposite ... no team is going to offer us a Cade or Kuminga for Garland even if he was playing like you wished he was.

I couldn't find a link to backup the rumor directly, but there was this one that says the Warriors were actively shopping the pair around in 2011 for CP3 and others:

https://www.radio.com/957thegame/articles/golden-state-warriors/warriors-tried-to-trade-steph-and-klay-for-cp3-in-2011


I think the point is to add Garland or Sexton to our pick to go up and get one of those guys. My strong preference would be to offer Sexton. Stillwater's strong preference would be to offer Garland. But it's really going to be dependent on who the team picking in that slot prefers, assuming that team is willing to trade the pick at all.

I find it funny how much value some people place in career long projected 1 way floor generals if you want to say DG is that[a floor general],because he obviously needs elite defenders around him that also are elite scorers to make up for his lack of scoring ability and lack of defensive ability.
DG despite obviously being coached to find teammates despite his dribbling in circles instead of running plays etc...is not worth more as is than Sexton who as of now is by far the better scorer and so if you would rather keep the guy who makes his teammates better but cant even get to the stripe or play through contact instead then he better be able to get stops to make up for all those gimmies he aint getting. DG is not the level of athlete I want the Cavs to have as a starter in a playoff setting IDC how skilled he is offensively.
I would love to keep him on the bench but Klutch will con some org into overpaying him before they realize thats who he is like they do so many that are interested in regular season stat clowns and it will probably be the Cavs


Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#30 » by Stillwater » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:01 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
I think the point is to add Garland or Sexton to our pick to go up and get one of those guys. My strong preference would be to offer Sexton. Stillwater's strong preference would be to offer Garland. But it's really going to be dependent on who the team picking in that slot prefers, assuming that team is willing to trade the pick at all.

I find it funny how much value some people place in career long projected 1 way floor generals if you want to say DG is that[a floor general],because he obviously needs elite defenders around him that also are elite scorers to make up for his lack of scoring ability and lack of defensive ability.
DG despite obviously being coached to find teammates despite his dribbling in circles instead of running plays etc...is not worth more as is than Sexton who as of now is by far the better scorer and so if you would rather keep the guy who makes his teammates better but cant even get to the stripe or play through contact instead then he better be able to get stops to make up for all those gimmies he aint getting. DG is not the level of athlete I want the Cavs to have as a starter in a playoff setting IDC how skilled he is offensively.
I would love to keep him on the bench but Klutch will con some org into overpaying him before they realize thats who he is like they do so many that are interested in regular season stat clowns and it will probably be the Cavs


Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.

If Garland is a better defender than Sexton when Sexton is guarding 1 guards and DG is guarding bigger wings I will revoke my fan card. I am just not believing in any small guard being a legit starter on a contender without being a above avg scorer.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#31 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:04 pm

Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:I find it funny how much value some people place in career long projected 1 way floor generals if you want to say DG is that[a floor general],because he obviously needs elite defenders around him that also are elite scorers to make up for his lack of scoring ability and lack of defensive ability.
DG despite obviously being coached to find teammates despite his dribbling in circles instead of running plays etc...is not worth more as is than Sexton who as of now is by far the better scorer and so if you would rather keep the guy who makes his teammates better but cant even get to the stripe or play through contact instead then he better be able to get stops to make up for all those gimmies he aint getting. DG is not the level of athlete I want the Cavs to have as a starter in a playoff setting IDC how skilled he is offensively.
I would love to keep him on the bench but Klutch will con some org into overpaying him before they realize thats who he is like they do so many that are interested in regular season stat clowns and it will probably be the Cavs


Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.

If Garland is a better defender than Sexton when Sexton is guarding 1 guards and DG is guarding bigger wings I will revoke my fan card. I am just not believing in any small guard being a legit starter on a contender without being a above avg scorer.


That's because you devalue assists and the impact it has on team's overall offensive efficiency.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Revenged25
Analyst
Posts: 3,219
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jun 05, 2018
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#32 » by Revenged25 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:19 pm

Garland has an on-off of -3.7
Sexton has an on-off of +1.8

Garland has an OBPM of -0.7 and a DBPM of -2.0 for a BPM of -2.7
Sexton has a OBPM of 1.2 and a DBPM of -1.9 for a BPM of -0.7

Garland has an AST% of 28.1
Sexton has an AST% of 20.1

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/garlada01.html
https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/sextoco01.html

Garland averages 5.8 APG and 10.6 PAPG for 7.4 Adj Assists and 14.8 Ast PTs Created
Sexton averages 4.1 APG and 8.9 PAPG for 5.2 Adj Assists and 10.4 Ast PTs created.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/passing/?Season=2020-21&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&PlayerPosition=G&TeamID=1610612739
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#33 » by Stillwater » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:21 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.

If Garland is a better defender than Sexton when Sexton is guarding 1 guards and DG is guarding bigger wings I will revoke my fan card. I am just not believing in any small guard being a legit starter on a contender without being a above avg scorer.


That's because you devalue assists and the impact it has on team's overall offensive efficiency.

No its because without being a legit threat himself he in fact does not draw enough attention typically and would have to make more difficult passes if he did not have teammates being instructed to compensate for that with their action.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#34 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:24 pm

Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:If Garland is a better defender than Sexton when Sexton is guarding 1 guards and DG is guarding bigger wings I will revoke my fan card. I am just not believing in any small guard being a legit starter on a contender without being a above avg scorer.


That's because you devalue assists and the impact it has on team's overall offensive efficiency.

No its because without being a legit threat himself he in fact does not draw enough attention typically and would have to make more difficult passes if he did not have teammates being instructed to compensate for that with their action.


I just can't.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#35 » by Stillwater » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:27 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
That's because you devalue assists and the impact it has on team's overall offensive efficiency.

No its because without being a legit threat himself he in fact does not draw enough attention typically and would have to make more difficult passes if he did not have teammates being instructed to compensate for that with their action.


I just can't.

me neither lol
on to the next thing is the way I look at it. I am just not that interested in the Cavs at all right now so I am probably being harder on DG than I should be, but I am sick of the dribbling around and then looking for bail out bigs or corner shooters no matter how often Phelps calls it a great pass in his profound post game shpeel smh
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 4,959
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#36 » by JonFromVA » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:28 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
I think the point is to add Garland or Sexton to our pick to go up and get one of those guys. My strong preference would be to offer Sexton. Stillwater's strong preference would be to offer Garland. But it's really going to be dependent on who the team picking in that slot prefers, assuming that team is willing to trade the pick at all.

I find it funny how much value some people place in career long projected 1 way floor generals if you want to say DG is that[a floor general],because he obviously needs elite defenders around him that also are elite scorers to make up for his lack of scoring ability and lack of defensive ability.
DG despite obviously being coached to find teammates despite his dribbling in circles instead of running plays etc...is not worth more as is than Sexton who as of now is by far the better scorer and so if you would rather keep the guy who makes his teammates better but cant even get to the stripe or play through contact instead then he better be able to get stops to make up for all those gimmies he aint getting. DG is not the level of athlete I want the Cavs to have as a starter in a playoff setting IDC how skilled he is offensively.
I would love to keep him on the bench but Klutch will con some org into overpaying him before they realize thats who he is like they do so many that are interested in regular season stat clowns and it will probably be the Cavs


Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.


From what we hear opposing teams already prefer Garland, but that doesn't get a deal done to get in to the top-5 unless the conditions are just right.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#37 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 9:32 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:I find it funny how much value some people place in career long projected 1 way floor generals if you want to say DG is that[a floor general],because he obviously needs elite defenders around him that also are elite scorers to make up for his lack of scoring ability and lack of defensive ability.
DG despite obviously being coached to find teammates despite his dribbling in circles instead of running plays etc...is not worth more as is than Sexton who as of now is by far the better scorer and so if you would rather keep the guy who makes his teammates better but cant even get to the stripe or play through contact instead then he better be able to get stops to make up for all those gimmies he aint getting. DG is not the level of athlete I want the Cavs to have as a starter in a playoff setting IDC how skilled he is offensively.
I would love to keep him on the bench but Klutch will con some org into overpaying him before they realize thats who he is like they do so many that are interested in regular season stat clowns and it will probably be the Cavs


Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.


From what we hear opposing teams already prefer Garland, but that doesn't get a deal done to get in to the top-5 unless the conditions are just right.


I think it probably starts with a team like the Warriors landing at No. 4 (with the Minny pick), the Cavs landing at 5-7, and the Warriors preferring an already developed player to whoever they'd be drafting at No. 4. Then you can maybe package the two of those picks to move up.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 4,959
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#38 » by JonFromVA » Mon Mar 1, 2021 11:07 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Garland is half way through his second NBA season. Sexton is half way through his third. Garland has a better defensive rating and the exact same DPM as Sexton. While I think that Sexton could do some more defensively in terms of effort, not arguing non-calls while the other team runs a 5-4 break, and not leaking out before we've secured the defensive rebound, I have real concerns about his team defense in any scheme that isn't straight man on man. The problem defensively is you can't hide them both, but I think Garland's the better defender hands down two years from now.

Offensively, Sexton is always going to have to play alongside someone who can run an offense. It would be better if it were a Ball/Simons type but it appears, for now anyway, that the window may have closed. Sexton, like Kyrie, is going to be a scorer, and like Kyrie, you can wait years in vain for him to become more, or you can go get the guy he needs to play alongside of to have a good team.

The good news is that if I'm right, and teams view Garland as having the higher ceiling, they're more likely to ask for him instead of Sexton on draft day. So you'll get your wish and maybe the Cavs will draft a true franchise cornerstone.


From what we hear opposing teams already prefer Garland, but that doesn't get a deal done to get in to the top-5 unless the conditions are just right.


I think it probably starts with a team like the Warriors landing at No. 4 (with the Minny pick), the Cavs landing at 5-7, and the Warriors preferring an already developed player to whoever they'd be drafting at No. 4. Then you can maybe package the two of those picks to move up.


It hurts my head just trying to come up with something that'd make sense for both sides. Having Garland apprentice under Steph sounds cool, but seems like a luxury.

Something more along the lines of Wiggins + TWolves pick for Drummond and Okoro might catch their attention?

But it doesn't resolve Sexland for us, doesn't move Love, burdens us with Wiggins, and we're counting on ping pong balls again.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,424
And1: 35,549
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#39 » by jbk1234 » Mon Mar 1, 2021 11:26 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
From what we hear opposing teams already prefer Garland, but that doesn't get a deal done to get in to the top-5 unless the conditions are just right.


I think it probably starts with a team like the Warriors landing at No. 4 (with the Minny pick), the Cavs landing at 5-7, and the Warriors preferring an already developed player to whoever they'd be drafting at No. 4. Then you can maybe package the two of those picks to move up.


It hurts my head just trying to come up with something that'd make sense for both sides. Having Garland apprentice under Steph sounds cool, but seems like a luxury.

Something more along the lines of Wiggins + TWolves pick for Drummond and Okoro might catch their attention?

But it doesn't resolve Sexland for us, doesn't move Love, burdens us with Wiggins, and we're counting on ping pong balls again.


Yeah, I'd just pass at that point. The pick is top 3 protected so best case scenario for the Warriors is No. 4 and I wouldn't do all that just to get No. 4. This would be real talk in terms of how did you like developing Wiseman off the bench all of last year and do you want to do that again, or do would you rather have Sexton or Garland off the bench.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 14,986
And1: 4,959
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: DG to the Pacers - what would it take? 

Post#40 » by JonFromVA » Tue Mar 2, 2021 12:14 am

jbk1234 wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
I think it probably starts with a team like the Warriors landing at No. 4 (with the Minny pick), the Cavs landing at 5-7, and the Warriors preferring an already developed player to whoever they'd be drafting at No. 4. Then you can maybe package the two of those picks to move up.


It hurts my head just trying to come up with something that'd make sense for both sides. Having Garland apprentice under Steph sounds cool, but seems like a luxury.

Something more along the lines of Wiggins + TWolves pick for Drummond and Okoro might catch their attention?

But it doesn't resolve Sexland for us, doesn't move Love, burdens us with Wiggins, and we're counting on ping pong balls again.


Yeah, I'd just pass at that point. The pick is top 3 protected so best case scenario for the Warriors is No. 4 and I wouldn't do all that just to get No. 4. This would be real talk in terms of how did you like developing Wiseman off the bench all of last year and do you want to do that again, or do would you rather have Sexton or Garland off the bench.


Better to go with the younger/higher-upside (in theory) player who will be cost controlled for 4 years, under control for quite a bit more and may be coming in to his own as your vets start to fade. Then fill out the bench with cheap vets and ring chasers.

They might consider a Wiseman for Allen swap, except one is getting a big contract this Summer and the other isn't. So, they'd need to unload and replace Wiggins to open the door for that, so, you could tack that on to the deal, lol.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers