LivingLegend wrote:KuruptedCav wrote:jbk1234 wrote:What people aren't allowing for is that on another team, Sexton's usage and FGAs would look a lot like Clarkson's usage and FGAs.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile appjbk1234 wrote:What people aren't allowing for is that on another team, Sexton's usage and FGAs would look a lot like Clarkson's usage and FGAs.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
That’s not the issue. The issue is that we think his efficiency continues its trajectory.
Clarkson and Sexton have the same usage rate. The difference is that Clarkson has it primarily against a second unit.
Drop Collin’s usage to 20-25 and he looks a heck of a lot like Terry Rozier/Fred Vanvleet. And that’s what we expect to see with Rubio running the second unit.
Move him to the bench like Clarkson and mix in Conley, Mitchell, Gobert, Bogs, etc.
Actually, that’s a good question. Would Utah trade Clarkson for Sexton on the same contract?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Well Clarkson plays 28min. Not 20-25. He also plays a lot more with the 1s than you think he does, especially towards the end of games. I watched him do it all postseason, its not like he is out there strictly with 2nd units all the time. He was helping close out games in the playoffs.
I think the Jazz would do the trade strictly because of age, but Clarkson fits exactly what the Jazz need and thats a guy who could come off the bench and light up the scoreboard. I dont think Sextons more slow and methodical ISO approach would work on that Jazz team.
Usage rate and minutes per game are not the same thing.
Yes, lineups are fluid. But the fact remains that Jordan Clarkson is never the defensive focal point. Fun fact though, he’s the only player who is part of the 5 worst Utah Jazz lineups by net-rating.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app