No idea what's Altman's plan but I agree both of you: we're playing fine enough and we deal a cap comfortable enough to not have any sort of trade urge.
Even if we aren't the most attractive market ever we're entitled to think about obtaining assets instead of giving them up. We could get some fine player almost for free or we can stay as we are... both works for me.
There is a recurrent concept at Spanish Forum we call
pajitrades (roughly transl:
wanky-trades or
Jerking trades off).
Basically: trade ideas with neither foundation nor even sense beyond personal taste, bias, filias and phobias.
These are mine:
Bol Bol we could get him in exchange of basically nothing. Nobody even knows how bad his foot injury is and there is bad gossip about his personality.
MonTrollzel is too valuable to come for free but he's one punch at the face over some teammate or coach ahead to be kicked out from WAS. He could ending up cheaper than we think.
Yep... I know would be dumb messing with locker-room balance with such (apparently) problematic guys. I told you
wanky trades don't need to have sense.
If you want more healthy attitudes (at least with teammates and coaches):

Wishful thinking at its best. Now way Fincho let out the best player he has to make up for KAT's frailties and Vandarra himself probably wouldn't switch a starting spot at MIN for a bench role at Ohio but dreaming is for free.

Same. No way MIN let El Motivao Beverly out and he would play here a more minor rol. I just love the guy.