Trade Ideas (Part III)
Moderator: ijspeelman
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
- pelifan
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,237
- And1: 21,691
- Joined: Aug 12, 2014
- Location: Small market
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
what do ya'll think about Moore for Crowder? I'd be a little concerned about thinning out the frontcourt, but getting a reliable 2 way guard seems to be Cle #1 priority at the moment.
before you ugh omg Etwaun Moore gross, look up his numbers on the year.
before you ugh omg Etwaun Moore gross, look up his numbers on the year.

Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
pelifan wrote:what do ya'll think about Moore for Crowder? I'd be a little concerned about thinning out the frontcourt, but getting a reliable 2 way guard seems to be Cle #1 priority at the moment.
before you ugh omg Etwaun Moore gross, look up his numbers on the year.
not really. The priority concern going forward has too be upgrades defensively in the front court. Unless an all nba player becomes available that justifies moving the Nets pick for, who plays the pg or pf/center position. (highly unlikely).
Maybe if Swish and Korver continue their shooting slumps somebody like Moore becomes appealing.
Crowder is playing out of position and last years shooting must have been a fluke because he has returned to lower %.
If I were Cav's I would be trying hard asap to get Noel for Zizic and Rose,and if possible moving Crowder straight up for Evans and Chalmers expiring's.
Cavs then would still have both 1sts and the option to move 1 if an all nba player becomes available.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
pelifan wrote:what do ya'll think about Moore for Crowder? I'd be a little concerned about thinning out the frontcourt, but getting a reliable 2 way guard seems to be Cle #1 priority at the moment.
before you ugh omg Etwaun Moore gross, look up his numbers on the year.
I'm all for it. Anyone who can defend the PG position at this point would be great.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992512^^ here's my guess on what might work for both teams.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Junior
- Posts: 400
- And1: 259
- Joined: Jun 10, 2016
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
Stillwater wrote:https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992512^^ here's my guess on what might work for both teams.
I think a deal would be close. But to dump TT I think a late 1st would have to be added. Crowder has value but not enough for young Sac talent.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992519
Or maybe something along these lines with the Miami 2nd.
Or maybe something along these lines with the Miami 2nd.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
CaptainCanada wrote:Stillwater wrote:https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992512^^ here's my guess on what might work for both teams.
I think a deal would be close. But to dump TT I think a late 1st would have to be added. Crowder has value but not enough for young Sac talent.
I don't think so with Hill wanting out and them not needing him with Fox the future. None of the bigs they've drafted are as good as Thompson.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Junior
- Posts: 400
- And1: 259
- Joined: Jun 10, 2016
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
Stillwater wrote:CaptainCanada wrote:Stillwater wrote:https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992512^^ here's my guess on what might work for both teams.
I think a deal would be close. But to dump TT I think a late 1st would have to be added. Crowder has value but not enough for young Sac talent.
I don't think so with Hill wanting out and them not needing him with Fox the future. None of the bigs they've drafted are as good as Thompson.
Willy Caultey-Stein is playing better this year after looking lost his rookie year. It would be an interesting deal; not ideal for Sacramento (not greatly benefiting them as much as Cav's) but could work. Sacramento's GM decisions the last couple of years hasn't been great (minus 2018 draft).
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
I'd be a little nervous about trading both Crowder & TT. If WCS is added, I guess it's worth the risk but WCS has some JaVale McGee in him.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 6,627
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
Stillwater wrote:https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992512^^ here's my guess on what might work for both teams.
Kings fan:
Lose our number.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
Pelon chingon wrote:Stillwater wrote:https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6992512^^ here's my guess on what might work for both teams.
Kings fan:
Lose our number.
Altman :"You called us"
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 45
- And1: 10
- Joined: Jul 02, 2017
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
I think that is a good trade except out going should be Shumpert, TT, the Cavs would probably have to throw in their own first rounder to make it happen, but to shed those two and their contracts definitely favors the Cavs. I would take Sampson if the Cavs can dump Zizic also. Cavs would get Hill, Cauley-Stein and another athletic wing in Sampson.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
Truthful1 wrote:I think that is a good trade except out going should be Shumpert, TT, the Cavs would probably have to throw in their own first rounder to make it happen, but to shed those two and their contracts definitely favors the Cavs. I would take Sampson if the Cavs can dump Zizic also. Cavs would get Hill, Cauley-Stein and another athletic wing in Sampson.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I'm good with this but you're not *dumping* a 21-year old who makes less than $2 million per. A third-string center on a vet minimum deal costs that much.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
Man the Clippers look pretty damn good with Jordan out. This Rockets game is reinforcing my skepticism that he'd *help* against the Warriors.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
The trade deadline can't get here soon enough. So long as Cedi & the Brooklyn 1st still belong to the Cavs, I'll be happy.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
FWIW: https://factoryofsadness.co/2018/01/16/cleveland-cavaliers-rumors-nba-exec-says-trade-way/
Really hope we're getting either E'Tuan Moore or George Hill.
Really hope we're getting either E'Tuan Moore or George Hill.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,970
- And1: 6,627
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
jbk1234 wrote:FWIW: https://factoryofsadness.co/2018/01/16/cleveland-cavaliers-rumors-nba-exec-says-trade-way/
Really hope we're getting either E'Tuan Moore or George Hill.
He's available but the kings still need incentive to make a trade.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 59,115
- And1: 36,164
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Trade Ideas (Part III)
ATTN: NETS PICK IS OFF THE TABLE FOR ANYONE LESS THAN AN ALL NBA PLAYER ON A MULTIYEAR DEAL
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING