Terry or Crawford?

general · Post #1 » by **general** » Sat Apr 7, 2012 6:37 pm

They have similar roles They have both won 6th man.The difference is Terry is 35 going on 36 years old and is 6'2 and more of a spot up or coming of screen shooter and has hit Big shots.Crawford is 31 actually just turned 32 I see and is a 6'5 Point/Shooting guard who can create by himself and is the All-Time Leader in 4pt plays Made. and "nickname" is the closer who's known for Clutch shots, crossover moves and scoring the ball.Both are free agents who would you have?

rjgraca · Post #2 » by **rjgraca** » Sat Apr 7, 2012 6:52 pm

Cavs are rebuilding and have little need for collecting the over the hill 30+ years of age players. With Irving, I don't see the Cavs having any need for Terry or Crawford.

KuruptedCav · Post #3 » by **KuruptedCav** » Sun Apr 8, 2012 4:05 am

Terry. Crawford has made a career out of being the wrong piece to the puzzle. That said, neither has any business on a team in year one of their rebuild.

Post #4 » by **TheOUTLAW** » Mon Apr 9, 2012 12:05 am

Terry is a better and more importantly a smarter player. Crawful is called crawful for a reason. Neither has any use on the Cavs however.