are we purposely building a non 3 max contracts team?
Posted: Mon Feb 4, 2013 12:21 pm
Since it's becoming so hard to keep 3 max deals under the new CBA, it seems like we're purposely drafting solid role player but not superstar potential players.
Tristan Thompson was a solid pick, and is looking to be 2nd best player from 2011 draft, however Jonas V had more star potential, and is a center (all star centers are always max players).
But with Tristan even if he pans out to be an All Star, I could see us signing him to less than 10 per year.
Same with Waiters, Drummond was available at #4 but if he was to play to his potential, we're looking at a sure max player.
Now it's not all that bad to have 3 max players, and I think our ownership would actually pay them, but as we know there's different kind of max players, both Roy Hibbert and Carmelo Anthony are max players, obviously would rather have one than the other, I think we passed on some players to prevent having to overpay them down the line.
But that's just a theory.
Tristan Thompson was a solid pick, and is looking to be 2nd best player from 2011 draft, however Jonas V had more star potential, and is a center (all star centers are always max players).
But with Tristan even if he pans out to be an All Star, I could see us signing him to less than 10 per year.
Same with Waiters, Drummond was available at #4 but if he was to play to his potential, we're looking at a sure max player.
Now it's not all that bad to have 3 max players, and I think our ownership would actually pay them, but as we know there's different kind of max players, both Roy Hibbert and Carmelo Anthony are max players, obviously would rather have one than the other, I think we passed on some players to prevent having to overpay them down the line.
But that's just a theory.