Cavs v. NY
Moderator: ijspeelman
Cavs v. NY
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Cavs v. NY
Am I the only one who wants to see Andy and Hawes on the court at the same time?
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
TheOUTLAW
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,920
- And1: 2,757
- Joined: Aug 23, 2002
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
I marvel at how little respect the Cavs get from the refs even when at home against another awful team
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,814
- And1: 35,907
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
Nothing like a 30 minute half time to cool off Anthony.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
TheOUTLAW
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,920
- And1: 2,757
- Joined: Aug 23, 2002
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
By far the most important Knick player has bee Prigioni. Heand Stoudemire are the reason the knicks lead in this game
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
B Mac
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,733
- And1: 540
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: North Canton, Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
The Cavs came out in the 3rd quarter and fought hard as hell to get back into this. Unfortunately the refs decided to stop calling fouls on the Knicks.
Hawes was fouled on 4 straight possessions with no fouls. The only reason he didnt get a technical is because the refs knew they messed up.
Crazy.
Hawes was fouled on 4 straight possessions with no fouls. The only reason he didnt get a technical is because the refs knew they messed up.
Crazy.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
B Mac
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,733
- And1: 540
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: North Canton, Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
This is getting flat out unbelievable.
How is it possible to not get any calls at all at home against the Knicks of all teams.
Sickening.
How is it possible to not get any calls at all at home against the Knicks of all teams.
Sickening.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
B Mac
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,733
- And1: 540
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: North Canton, Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
The refs should apologize to Big Z for ruining his jersey retirement night.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
Okada
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,595
- And1: 687
- Joined: Dec 06, 2013
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
The refs genuinely screw the Cavs more than almost any other team. I know how homerific that sounds but my god.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
SaiCLE
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,099
- And1: 215
- Joined: Jun 29, 2012
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
Something needs to be done with these refs.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
B Mac
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,733
- And1: 540
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: North Canton, Ohio
- Contact:
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
Is there ANY doubt that the NBA wants the Knicks in the playoffs?
I dont see how anyone can watch that 4th quarter without cringing at the officiating.
Man.. that was so bad that it made me end my streak of not bitching about the refs... and it's been a looooong time since Ive said much about them.
I dont see how anyone can watch that 4th quarter without cringing at the officiating.
Man.. that was so bad that it made me end my streak of not bitching about the refs... and it's been a looooong time since Ive said much about them.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
fart
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,310
- And1: 1,769
- Joined: May 21, 2011
Re: Cavs v. NY
No playoffs, no top 5 pick, no offseason moves to be made. I hope you guys enjoyed your playoff push you all so desperatly wanted.
SargentBargs101 wrote:CB-Blazer wrote:what the heck is an Ebanks?
The remote delivery of new and traditional banking products and services through electronic delivery channels. There you go bud
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
Okada
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,595
- And1: 687
- Joined: Dec 06, 2013
-
Re: Cavs v. NY
fart wrote:No playoffs, no top 5 pick, no offseason moves to be made. I hope you guys enjoyed your playoff push you all so desperatly wanted.
Oh cut it out Gong Jr.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
KuruptedCav
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,149
- And1: 1,171
- Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Re: Cavs v. NY
fart wrote:No playoffs, no top 5 pick, no offseason moves to be made. I hope you guys enjoyed your playoff push you all so desperatly wanted.
It's the Cavs. They were going to take the 14th best player regardless of whether they had the 4th pick or the14th pick.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
gflem
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,072
- And1: 281
- Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Re: Cavs v. NY
KuruptedCav wrote:fart wrote:No playoffs, no top 5 pick, no offseason moves to be made. I hope you guys enjoyed your playoff push you all so desperatly wanted.
It's the Cavs. They were going to take the 14th best player regardless of whether they had the 4th pick or the14th pick.
That almost brought a smile to my face. I was thinking that an elbow to the face was the only response to what was happening. If the refs refuse to call obvious muggings on the floor, that's when things usually get out of hand. Like BMac said it is obvious that the NBA wants the Knicks in the playoffs.
The league probably figured Brooklyn was a shoo in to make the playoffs, and were salivating at the thought of 2 NY teams making it, now they have to help the Knicks for even one of those teams to have a chance.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
Fiktion
- Sophomore
- Posts: 144
- And1: 133
- Joined: Jul 01, 2013
Re: Cavs v. NY
gflem wrote:The league probably figured Brooklyn was a shoo in to make the playoffs, and were salivating at the thought of 2 NY teams making it, now they have to help the Knicks for even one of those teams to have a chance.
Wait what? Brooklyn is the 5th seed.
Re: Cavs v. NY
-
gflem
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,072
- And1: 281
- Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Re: Cavs v. NY
Fiktion wrote:gflem wrote:The league probably figured Brooklyn was a shoo in to make the playoffs, and were salivating at the thought of 2 NY teams making it, now they have to help the Knicks for even one of those teams to have a chance.
Wait what? Brooklyn is the 5th seed.
Yeah, brain lock there. I was looking at the standings earlier in the week and was wondering when someone would call me out on that.