Sexton, Summer League, and youngins
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 12:28 pm
So tell me about Sexton. Good pick? Did he go around his projected range? What’s he good and bad at?
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1717677
jbk1234 wrote:Some pundits had him rated over Trae Young. He's a better two-way PG. He's athletic, but only 19 so he needs his body to fill out a little more. There are some concerns about his shooting which is why he dropped to us.
Revenged25 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Some pundits had him rated over Trae Young. He's a better two-way PG. He's athletic, but only 19 so he needs his body to fill out a little more. There are some concerns about his shooting which is why he dropped to us.
I think the Eric Bledsoe comparison is fair though I think Bledsoe might've been a better shooter, at least once he got to the Suns. Maybe Mike Conley is a better comparison or a mix of Bledsoe/Conley?
jbk1234 wrote:Revenged25 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Some pundits had him rated over Trae Young. He's a better two-way PG. He's athletic, but only 19 so he needs his body to fill out a little more. There are some concerns about his shooting which is why he dropped to us.
I think the Eric Bledsoe comparison is fair though I think Bledsoe might've been a better shooter, at least once he got to the Suns. Maybe Mike Conley is a better comparison or a mix of Bledsoe/Conley?
Supposedly, Sexton shot a lot better in his workout for the Cavs. In the one and done era, a lot of players improve their shot after coming out college. Frankly, Cedi needs to get in the gym and work on his this summer.
Revenged25 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Revenged25 wrote:
I think the Eric Bledsoe comparison is fair though I think Bledsoe might've been a better shooter, at least once he got to the Suns. Maybe Mike Conley is a better comparison or a mix of Bledsoe/Conley?
Supposedly, Sexton shot a lot better in his workout for the Cavs. In the one and done era, a lot of players improve their shot after coming out college. Frankly, Cedi needs to get in the gym and work on his this summer.
That's good to hear. I thought Cedi was supposed to have a good shot when he came over. Did he regress or something? Though I do like the potential of Cedi/Nance/Zizic if they could ever get more time in a game to develop.
jbk1234 wrote:Revenged25 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
Supposedly, Sexton shot a lot better in his workout for the Cavs. In the one and done era, a lot of players improve their shot after coming out college. Frankly, Cedi needs to get in the gym and work on his this summer.
That's good to hear. I thought Cedi was supposed to have a good shot when he came over. Did he regress or something? Though I do like the potential of Cedi/Nance/Zizic if they could ever get more time in a game to develop.
I just don't think that Zizic has the lateral quickness to ever been anything other than a third-string center in the NBA. His PNR defense makes Love look like DPOY.
Dupp wrote:So tell me about Sexton. Good pick? Did he go around his projected range? What’s he good and bad at?
Fischella wrote:Dupp wrote:So tell me about Sexton. Good pick? Did he go around his projected range? What’s he good and bad at?
really good at transition play, can surprise people with quicks, smart decisions with open space and def finishing
really good at finding open lanes in the halfcourt, almost like a RB, think Le'Veon Bell with his body control horizontally, ability to stop and go, move around guys, issue is, he gets to the middle but has no real burst unless he can take extra steps (like in transition, continuing acceleration) and he doesn't have craft around the rim, he got to the line a ton but it's unlikely to translate, he was just throwing himself at people hoping it will work
physical player, can run some PnR, not an advanced passer, but if he sees it, he can make it, much better in transition there obviously
issues on terms of been a full-time high usg% Guard, you want him with another initiator on your team 100%, he is not a guy that's good at controlling the tempo and the game
also an issue running PnR is that players can go under, his pull-up is hit&miss, much better from long 2 range, but that's not as useful, pretty rigid and mechanical, I think he is going to be a fine off-ball shooter in time, not diverse but able to spot up and attack close-outs
defense is super overrated, misses rotations, attack without regard for team defense, very on-ball focus, can have some presence there, but for the most part he needs real coaching and understanding
I like some of his foundation, but to me it's hard to envision his ceiling as a real difference maker as a PG, he is strong and has a nice frame, but not as big as PGs nor as explosive as PGs with his skills limitations.
He has some similarities with Eric Bledsoe, not as a strong, and Jeff Teague, but not as quick, so think something in between as a ceiling, might have a couple seasons in his prime as a top50 if lucky, maybe an All Star if in the right team (think Teague).
Issue is that if you are paying those guys from what they think they are worth, and with Sexton's pedigree and how the media likes him, he is likely to be overpaid his whole career, like if you can have some dudes for the minimum like certain rookies, or even MLE guys like Darren Collison, that's better allocation of resources than paying Jeff Teague (using him as a parallel) what he got, or Bledsoe.
If Sexton pans out, I'd trade him quick for a better asset.
Fischella wrote:Lillard is significantly more explosive around the rim, like Sexton has no burst vertically unless he is on the move, a miles better shooter, and has some sick moves in PnR, I like Sexton but for him to be great he is going to need to become a bonkers shooter, I just don't think he has the physical goods otherwise really
He is just fine there, and with his skills, fine isn't gonna cut it to be a stud player.
Stillwater wrote:Fischella wrote:Lillard is significantly more explosive around the rim, like Sexton has no burst vertically unless he is on the move, a miles better shooter, and has some sick moves in PnR, I like Sexton but for him to be great he is going to need to become a bonkers shooter, I just don't think he has the physical goods otherwise really
He is just fine there, and with his skills, fine isn't gonna cut it to be a stud player.
Clearly you are just making **** up now...keep dreaming
Fischella wrote:Stillwater wrote:Fischella wrote:Lillard is significantly more explosive around the rim, like Sexton has no burst vertically unless he is on the move, a miles better shooter, and has some sick moves in PnR, I like Sexton but for him to be great he is going to need to become a bonkers shooter, I just don't think he has the physical goods otherwise really
He is just fine there, and with his skills, fine isn't gonna cut it to be a stud player.
Clearly you are just making **** up now...keep dreaming
Man, I have literally watched every finish that Sexton has attempted this year at Alabama in synergy, when he can load up on the open court and can take that force from running into blowing by guys cause of eating space, he can rise and finish, in half-court? no chance, he is basically trying to buy FTs, he isn't going to be finishing over guys in the NBA out of PnR
He is a solid athlete with some really cool coordination and instinctual plays in terms of carving space or recognizing patterns to drive, but not a nuclear guy that can load up and soar, like a Dennis Smith