Game 5
Moderator: ijspeelman
Game 5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,840
- And1: 35,921
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Game 5
LOL at that starting unit. We don't even have a second string PF on the roster. Watching Frye try to guard Blake or Drummond is going to be interesting.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 5
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,734
- And1: 3,655
- Joined: Jun 15, 2017
-
Re: Game 5
Of course with Love out we will win and a bunch of people will create trade threads for Love again.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Re: Game 5
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 45
- And1: 10
- Joined: Jul 02, 2017
Re: Game 5
TT pregame interview. Talking about Griffin. I will make it tough on him....lol. He is going to get dominated tonight like he always does against any above average big man and any point guard he switches out on. Why does that bum have to be the longest tenured Cav. Should have got rid of him years ago.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Game 5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,840
- And1: 35,921
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Game 5
Truthful1 wrote:TT pregame interview. Talking about Griffin. I will make it tough on him....lol. He is going to get dominated tonight like he always does against any above average big man and any point guard he switches out on. Why does that bum have to be the longest tenured Cav. Should have got rid of him years ago.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
It is my hope that tonight is a sign that he just lost his starting spot. Nance is already better than him.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,840
- And1: 35,921
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Game 5
JR looks pretty cooked to me. It's going to be a long season holding onto him until draft day when he'll actually have trade value.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,840
- And1: 35,921
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Game 5
The pocket pass to a rolling TT is easily the least efficient play in the Cavs playbook. Once you factor in the turnovers, blocks and misses, I'd bet it has a 20% conversion rate.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 5
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 45
- And1: 10
- Joined: Jul 02, 2017
Re: Game 5
jbk1234 wrote:The pocket pass to a rolling TT is easily the least efficient play in the Cavs playbook. Once you factor in the turnovers, blocks and misses, I'd bet it has a 20% conversion rate.
Lol...any pass to TT is a bad decision. He has the worst hands. Yesterday, he was like 1-10 and pretty much all his shots were 4 feet or less from the basket. Nance should be starting like you said.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Re: Game 5
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 45
- And1: 10
- Joined: Jul 02, 2017
Re: Game 5
I heard the Cavs offered Hood about 7 million a season in a multi year deal which I thought was too much, and I am glad he didn't take the offer. He is a soft player.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Game 5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,840
- And1: 35,921
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Game 5
Truthful1 wrote:I heard the Cavs offered Hood about 7 million a season in a multi year deal which I thought was too much, and I am glad he didn't take the offer. He is a soft player.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I'm not happy that he's starting but $7M is less than the MLE. You're lucky to get a decent bench player for that money.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 5
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,840
- And1: 35,921
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Game 5
This team just doesn't have enough offense without Love to win in the NBA.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Game 5
- Trailbreaker
- Junior
- Posts: 360
- And1: 115
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
-
Re: Game 5
jbk1234 wrote:Truthful1 wrote:I heard the Cavs offered Hood about 7 million a season in a multi year deal which I thought was too much, and I am glad he didn't take the offer. He is a soft player.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
I'm not happy that he's starting but $7M is less than the MLE. You're lucky to get a decent bench player for that money.
Agreed, we got a pretty good deal on a guy who can shoot, create his own shot, and finish at the rim.
