No chance.VanWest82 wrote:#3 + Love for Siakam + 22 FRP
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Moderator: ijspeelman
No chance.VanWest82 wrote:#3 + Love for Siakam + 22 FRP
It's a 4 player draft. They're not moving back to 5. Barnes and Kuminga are entire tier down.Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:If Altman trades out of the top 3 for anyone not named Jaylen Brown, I just don't know man.Stillwater wrote:If the Cavs trade anything it will be down from 3 to 5 and 8 with Orlando imo.
They could maybe figure out a deal to get Okeke or Hampton in the process.
I dont think there will be any shortage of offers for the pick given one of Suggs or Green are highly likley to be there.
I also would not put it past Koby FKN Altman to draft one of them and not trade either Sexland or Okoro.
I want Kuminga or Barnes badly for this roster if they dont make any trades and really are committed to Sexland.
I don't see too many ways Mobley falls.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
I mean 5 still gets them 1 of Barnes or Kuminga most likely so I could see it if those are their fit picks esp also getting 8
LivingLegend wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Yep. Unless someone comes in with a stupid offer for Suggs.Harper4Ferry? wrote:#3, Green?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Alright, Ive spent 45 mins reading/watching everything about Green. He sounds really good but the biggest comparison a lot of writers seem to make is Zach Lavine--who took 7 years to go from raw talent to putting it all together. Many believe that will be the same process for Green because he is incredibly raw talent that doesnt know much else besides get the ball and score.
Apparently his negatives is that 1) He has no feel for the game 2) Hes a bad defender that gives little effort and 3) Hes doesnt pass much and lacks play making for others.
So it sounds like he is a dynamic scorer that does little else and it will depend on if he develops in other areas for him to be successful. One article said that he could go two ways-- Zack Lavine or Terrance Ross but either way its going to take him a few years to develop and will likely be best served in a 6th man role for a few seasons.
LivingLegend wrote:jbk1234 wrote:No. Stop this. It's a 4 player draft if you're higher on Suggs than I am.Harper4Ferry? wrote:#3, Prince(or Cedi)(or even Nance) for #7/14/Wiseman?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
For what it's worth, Chris Fedor had back to back tweets saying 1) The Cavs draft room went "YESSS" and 2) No one should rule out Suggs
Not sure if he knows anything but he does seem to know inside details about what the Cavs are looking to do most of the time.
LivingLegend wrote:Stillwater wrote:LivingLegend wrote:
After reading the article that came out yesterday about everybody in the Cavs front office gushing over Garland and think he is a Super Star in the making---hes not going anywhere.
Sexton is the obvious trade candidate but idk who would really want him or what his value would be. It seems like the Cavs like Sexton more than the rest of the league likes Sexton.
Klutch inspired Garland trade bait you watch
Nah, it cited what players, assistant coaches from other teams, commentators and current Cavs players were saying about Garland.
Apparently the Cavs received compliments all the time after games from players/coaches on the other team about how good Garland is going to be. They cited Draymond Green and Bradley Beal then also cited Sam Cassell, Vince Carter, Phil Handy and God Shammgod making it a point to bring up how good Garland looks to the Cavs coaching staff.
One Cavs player apparently texted the writer and said "I'm high on Darius, I think he's the best of our young core"
JonFromVA wrote:LivingLegend wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Yep. Unless someone comes in with a stupid offer for Suggs.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
Alright, Ive spent 45 mins reading/watching everything about Green. He sounds really good but the biggest comparison a lot of writers seem to make is Zach Lavine--who took 7 years to go from raw talent to putting it all together. Many believe that will be the same process for Green because he is incredibly raw talent that doesnt know much else besides get the ball and score.
Apparently his negatives is that 1) He has no feel for the game 2) Hes a bad defender that gives little effort and 3) Hes doesnt pass much and lacks play making for others.
So it sounds like he is a dynamic scorer that does little else and it will depend on if he develops in other areas for him to be successful. One article said that he could go two ways-- Zack Lavine or Terrance Ross but either way its going to take him a few years to develop and will likely be best served in a 6th man role for a few seasons.
Just have to be very careful given how little defense is usually played at the G-League level, let alone by a player biding his time until the draft. Hopefully someone gets him on the scales, though, because if he's still 180lb that's like Garland as a rook in a 4-5" taller package. That's going to be an impediment for him in the short-term.
fwiw, Green's standing reach was measured within 1/2" of Isaac's.
Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:If Altman trades out of the top 3 for anyone not named Jaylen Brown, I just don't know man.Stillwater wrote:If the Cavs trade anything it will be down from 3 to 5 and 8 with Orlando imo.
They could maybe figure out a deal to get Okeke or Hampton in the process.
I dont think there will be any shortage of offers for the pick given one of Suggs or Green are highly likley to be there.
I also would not put it past Koby FKN Altman to draft one of them and not trade either Sexland or Okoro.
I want Kuminga or Barnes badly for this roster if they dont make any trades and really are committed to Sexland.
I don't see too many ways Mobley falls.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
I mean 5 still gets them 1 of Barnes or Kuminga most likely so I could see it if those are their fit picks esp also getting 8
LivingLegend wrote:Well, this should be a fun month or two lol I guess one option is for the Rockets to fall on love with Green which then Mobley would slide to #3. Then you have this whole overlapping with Allen/Nance/Love narrative.
I love that the Cavs have a great pick, I would love it more if there were some really good SFs at the top.
I feel like the last few drafts are just littered with guards or 'modern day bigs' at the top. Which is where the cavs keep getting pigeon holed into roster redundancy
jbk1234 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:Well, this should be a fun month or two lol I guess one option is for the Rockets to fall on love with Green which then Mobley would slide to #3. Then you have this whole overlapping with Allen/Nance/Love narrative.
I love that the Cavs have a great pick, I would love it more if there were some really good SFs at the top.
I feel like the last few drafts are just littered with guards or 'modern day bigs' at the top. Which is where the cavs keep getting pigeon holed into roster redundancy
Kevin Love should have less than zero to do with who the Cavs decide to draft. Also, I like the idea of Mobley, or even Green, developing off the bench for at least the first half their rookie seasons (probably longer with the big man). I'm tired of starting guys who aren't ready to play in the NBA and having it impact the entire starting unit.
LivingLegend wrote:jbk1234 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:Well, this should be a fun month or two lol I guess one option is for the Rockets to fall on love with Green which then Mobley would slide to #3. Then you have this whole overlapping with Allen/Nance/Love narrative.
I love that the Cavs have a great pick, I would love it more if there were some really good SFs at the top.
I feel like the last few drafts are just littered with guards or 'modern day bigs' at the top. Which is where the cavs keep getting pigeon holed into roster redundancy
Kevin Love should have less than zero to do with who the Cavs decide to draft. Also, I like the idea of Mobley, or even Green, developing off the bench for at least the first half their rookie seasons (probably longer with the big man). I'm tired of starting guys who aren't ready to play in the NBA and having it impact the entire starting unit.
Fair but people make it out to be that pairing Mobley/Allen would run into the same issues as Garland/Sexton. Similar to the issues with Drummond/Allen.
I really don't care either way, just get the highest upside player possible. It might make sense for whoever they draft to come off the bench for a little while but it doesn't seem like Cavs are interested in doing that
It sounds like they want somebody who can help the team out immediately and contribute to a real playoff push. I honestly think it's more likely they trade the pick for a proven player than keep it at this point.
LivingLegend wrote:jbk1234 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:Well, this should be a fun month or two lol I guess one option is for the Rockets to fall on love with Green which then Mobley would slide to #3. Then you have this whole overlapping with Allen/Nance/Love narrative.
I love that the Cavs have a great pick, I would love it more if there were some really good SFs at the top.
I feel like the last few drafts are just littered with guards or 'modern day bigs' at the top. Which is where the cavs keep getting pigeon holed into roster redundancy
Kevin Love should have less than zero to do with who the Cavs decide to draft. Also, I like the idea of Mobley, or even Green, developing off the bench for at least the first half their rookie seasons (probably longer with the big man). I'm tired of starting guys who aren't ready to play in the NBA and having it impact the entire starting unit.
Fair but people make it out to be that pairing Mobley/Allen would run into the same issues as Garland/Sexton. Similar to the issues with Drummond/Allen.
I really don't care either way, just get the highest upside player possible. It might make sense for whoever they draft to come off the bench for a little while but it doesn't seem like Cavs are interested in doing that
It sounds like they want somebody who can help the team out immediately and contribute to a real playoff push. I honestly think it's more likely they trade the pick for a proven player than keep it at this point.
jbk1234 wrote:Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:If Altman trades out of the top 3 for anyone not named Jaylen Brown, I just don't know man.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app
I mean 5 still gets them 1 of Barnes or Kuminga most likely so I could see it if those are their fit picks esp also getting 8
Both Barnes and Kuminga have lower ceilings and are worse fits. Neither can shoot. I don't get you both wanting to keep Sexton and wanting to take guys that would shrink the floor for him.
Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Stillwater wrote:I mean 5 still gets them 1 of Barnes or Kuminga most likely so I could see it if those are their fit picks esp also getting 8
Both Barnes and Kuminga have lower ceilings and are worse fits. Neither can shoot. I don't get you both wanting to keep Sexton and wanting to take guys that would shrink the floor for him.
I don't agree at all about the ceiling comment esp Kuminga. and Barnes is clearly more impactful defensively than anyone we have even if he requires another move to get a true shooting specialist later.
Green seems like the more entertaining prospect that may or may not ever actually be a legit 1st option either it just seems unlikely they take him unless they already have plans to not pay Sexton or to bring one of them off the bench.
Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Stillwater wrote:I mean 5 still gets them 1 of Barnes or Kuminga most likely so I could see it if those are their fit picks esp also getting 8
Both Barnes and Kuminga have lower ceilings and are worse fits. Neither can shoot. I don't get you both wanting to keep Sexton and wanting to take guys that would shrink the floor for him.
I don't agree at all about the ceiling comment esp Kuminga. and Barnes is clearly more impactful defensively than anyone we have even if he requires another move to get a true shooting specialist later.
Green seems like the more entertaining prospect that may or may not ever actually be a legit 1st option either it just seems unlikely they take him unless they already have plans to not pay Sexton or to bring one of them off the bench.
jbk1234 wrote:Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
Both Barnes and Kuminga have lower ceilings and are worse fits. Neither can shoot. I don't get you both wanting to keep Sexton and wanting to take guys that would shrink the floor for him.
I don't agree at all about the ceiling comment esp Kuminga. and Barnes is clearly more impactful defensively than anyone we have even if he requires another move to get a true shooting specialist later.
Green seems like the more entertaining prospect that may or may not ever actually be a legit 1st option either it just seems unlikely they take him unless they already have plans to not pay Sexton or to bring one of them off the bench.
I just think you decide you like players and don't really care how any of them fit together in an organized basketball setting.
LivingLegend wrote:Stillwater wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
Both Barnes and Kuminga have lower ceilings and are worse fits. Neither can shoot. I don't get you both wanting to keep Sexton and wanting to take guys that would shrink the floor for him.
I don't agree at all about the ceiling comment esp Kuminga. and Barnes is clearly more impactful defensively than anyone we have even if he requires another move to get a true shooting specialist later.
Green seems like the more entertaining prospect that may or may not ever actually be a legit 1st option either it just seems unlikely they take him unless they already have plans to not pay Sexton or to bring one of them off the bench.
Im sick and tired of drafting guys who cant shoot and then spending 3 years teaching them how to shoot.
The Cavs need the closest thing to a 3/D guy as they can get considering those are the Cavs 2 biggest weaknesses. I would trade the Suns the #3 pick + Love for Mikal Bridges right now lol We need a Mikal Bridges, THAT type of player is exactly what this team needs. Or a guy like Kevin Porter Jr, he would be great and fill a massive need.
Stillwater wrote:LivingLegend wrote:Stillwater wrote:I don't agree at all about the ceiling comment esp Kuminga. and Barnes is clearly more impactful defensively than anyone we have even if he requires another move to get a true shooting specialist later.
Green seems like the more entertaining prospect that may or may not ever actually be a legit 1st option either it just seems unlikely they take him unless they already have plans to not pay Sexton or to bring one of them off the bench.
Im sick and tired of drafting guys who cant shoot and then spending 3 years teaching them how to shoot.
The Cavs need the closest thing to a 3/D guy as they can get considering those are the Cavs 2 biggest weaknesses. I would trade the Suns the #3 pick + Love for Mikal Bridges right now lol We need a Mikal Bridges, THAT type of player is exactly what this team needs. Or a guy like Kevin Porter Jr, he would be great and fill a massive need.
who can't shoot besides Okoro and JFro ? lol nice try
Sexton and DG can shoot, WIndler and Wade can shoot. They can get a specialist later if that is not enough. No point in drafting for skill based need at the same positions they already have good young players who can do it...