Game 26: Kings @ Cavs 12/9/2022
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:12 am
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2246941
KuruptedCav wrote:Cavs were gassed in Q4.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ijspeelman wrote:lol @r/cavs deciding that Garland is the problem and needs traded
JonFromVA wrote:ijspeelman wrote:lol @r/cavs deciding that Garland is the problem and needs traded
Garland doesn't need to be traded, but I do expect him to play better than that, even when having to deal with Davion Mitchell.
He's been a bit off this season and if anything this game shows it's not just because he has to share the ball with Mitchell.
I'd talk about the lack of production from Allen and Mobley, but that all starts with DG.
Feels like last year Darius would have closed this game out, no problem.
ijspeelman wrote:JonFromVA wrote:ijspeelman wrote:lol @r/cavs deciding that Garland is the problem and needs traded
Garland doesn't need to be traded, but I do expect him to play better than that, even when having to deal with Davion Mitchell.
He's been a bit off this season and if anything this game shows it's not just because he has to share the ball with Mitchell.
I'd talk about the lack of production from Allen and Mobley, but that all starts with DG.
Feels like last year Darius would have closed this game out, no problem.
Maybe I’m overselling it, but to me this seemed like a game where we lacked spacing so much that Garland couldn’t break down the defense enough to generate plays for others and when he did, the paint was so packed that most available plays were at the perimeter where we were at a disadvantage.
The only average to plus spacers last night: Garland, LeVert (some ppl would say arguable), and Cedi. That’s extremely limited for an eight man rotation. Kings were able to pack the paint and live with our three ball while they were gunslinging off contested shots.
Defense was played tonight and we held the Kings -3.5 rORTG (relative to their season avg ORTG). Due to injuries, we were lacking offensive firepower and I don’t think I can chalk it up to players not punching their weight.
He's still just 22 years old, probably gonna have some plays/games like that.JonFromVA wrote:ijspeelman wrote:JonFromVA wrote:
Garland doesn't need to be traded, but I do expect him to play better than that, even when having to deal with Davion Mitchell.
He's been a bit off this season and if anything this game shows it's not just because he has to share the ball with Mitchell.
I'd talk about the lack of production from Allen and Mobley, but that all starts with DG.
Feels like last year Darius would have closed this game out, no problem.
Maybe I’m overselling it, but to me this seemed like a game where we lacked spacing so much that Garland couldn’t break down the defense enough to generate plays for others and when he did, the paint was so packed that most available plays were at the perimeter where we were at a disadvantage.
The only average to plus spacers last night: Garland, LeVert (some ppl would say arguable), and Cedi. That’s extremely limited for an eight man rotation. Kings were able to pack the paint and live with our three ball while they were gunslinging off contested shots.
Defense was played tonight and we held the Kings -3.5 rORTG (relative to their season avg ORTG). Due to injuries, we were lacking offensive firepower and I don’t think I can chalk it up to players not punching their weight.
True, the spacing was awful, my expectations for Darius are just super high. I expect him to not turnover the ball, knock down those step backs, and not miss a floater or a pull-up when they leave him that.