mo williams, dan gadzuric, bobby simmons
for
wally szczerbiak,damon jones, joe smith
works in trade checker
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~1022~2178~406~788~831&teams=5~5~5~15~15~15&te=&cash=
or what about this instead
mo and gadzuric
for
snow, damon and #19
it works too
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~2178~406~796&teams=5~5~15~15&te=&cash=
would you do this deal
Moderator: ijspeelman
would you do this deal
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,461
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 08, 2005
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,461
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 08, 2005
snow wally and damon
for
mo gadz bobby
works in trade checker
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=
i think i would maybe at least want a future first included or something
for
mo gadz bobby
works in trade checker
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=
i think i would maybe at least want a future first included or something
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,326
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 25, 2005
I'd do the first and third trades in a heart beat. Much needed scoring relief all around for Lebron. Give all three of the guys that we receive some minutes, and they'll produce. Don't think Milwaukee would do that trade though, definitely could get something for Mo. Gadzuric's contract is manageable. I'm sure the Knicks would love to get their hands on Simmons.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,385
- And1: 7,500
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
I wouldn't. We need a SG, not a PG. We would be giving up cap-room for 2010 and taking on HUGE contracts in exchange for what? Mo Williams sure won't be getting us over the hump.
I don't think the upgrade of Mo Williams from Delonte West is enough to justify the impact that this trade will have on our long-term outlook.
We need a SG or a scoring PF.
I don't think the upgrade of Mo Williams from Delonte West is enough to justify the impact that this trade will have on our long-term outlook.
We need a SG or a scoring PF.
-
- NFL Analyst
- Posts: 16,964
- And1: 129
- Joined: Apr 30, 2001
- Location: Back in the 616
- Contact:
-
DowJones wrote:I wouldn't. We need a SG, not a PG. We would be giving up cap-room for 2010 and taking on HUGE contracts in exchange for what? Mo Williams sure won't be getting us over the hump.
I don't think the upgrade of Mo Williams from Delonte West is enough to justify the impact that this trade will have on our long-term outlook.
We need a SG or a scoring PF.
Considering Mo Williams' D, I'm not sure of he would be an upgrade over Delonte West. Certainly not the West we saw in the playoffs. Simmons is basically Ira Newble II, and Gadzuric isn't a big upgrade over Dwayne Jones. That deal does not help the Cavs short-term, and makes them worse long-term.
I agree the biggest need is a PF who can reliably put up 13+ PPG and not be a defensive liability. And that player should be taking minutes from Ben Wallace, not Joe Smith or Varejao.
Edit--I forgot to mention my other main reason for not liking this deal, the injury factor. Mo has missed at least 15 games in 4 of his 5 NBA seasons. We've seen that movie before...
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,972
- And1: 230
- Joined: Jun 25, 2004
How about:
Milwaukee trades: Redd, Charlie V, Dan Gadzuric
Cleveland trades: Wally, Anderson Varejao, Eric Snow + first round pick.
Not a Cav fan nor a Buck fan, but I think Redd to Cleveland would make sense. The Bucks are looking to dump Redd's contract, and probably Gadzuric/Simmons contract too. I can't see Scott Skiles coaching Charlie V. Snow, Anderson, and Wally are all expiring contracts, and I bet Skiles would love Sideshow Bob.
Meanwhile, the Cavs is getting a legit #2 scoring option who can shoot+create his own shots. While the Cavs gives up Anderson, they still have a lot of good front court players to play D and Charlie V would give the Cavs another scoring option.
It works in Trade checker...
Milwaukee trades: Redd, Charlie V, Dan Gadzuric
Cleveland trades: Wally, Anderson Varejao, Eric Snow + first round pick.
Not a Cav fan nor a Buck fan, but I think Redd to Cleveland would make sense. The Bucks are looking to dump Redd's contract, and probably Gadzuric/Simmons contract too. I can't see Scott Skiles coaching Charlie V. Snow, Anderson, and Wally are all expiring contracts, and I bet Skiles would love Sideshow Bob.
Meanwhile, the Cavs is getting a legit #2 scoring option who can shoot+create his own shots. While the Cavs gives up Anderson, they still have a lot of good front court players to play D and Charlie V would give the Cavs another scoring option.
It works in Trade checker...
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,733
- And1: 540
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: North Canton, Ohio
- Contact:
-