RealGM

he would be a solid back-up behind Z.....he is another Z....he can contribute when given mins & knows the game pretty well b/c he is vet...he may also come very cheap

i was thinking snow for Rasho Nesterovic?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDYD4BuNiog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXr6-5RDG4Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgU1mDy_FAA

I think that the Cavs would like to have Rasho but I can't see anyone that they'd be willing to give up to get him.

From a Pacer perspective, its unlikely you guys get Nesterovic without taking Tinsley.

Just saying.

There is no chance that the Cavs take Tinsley so I guess that means no Rasho.

You guys won't give up anything for him and like the poster above me said unless you want to take back Tinsley, Rasho's out of the equation.

Like I already said, the Cavs will not take Tinsley. It's not as though the Cavs need Rasho. He'd be a good back up but he'd still be a backup. Why is the world you guys think that a backup C is worth the Cavs taking on Tinsley and his contract I have no idea. But let me assure you that it's a ridiculus premise. What you keep suggesting is just plain dumb.

agree


rasho and tinsley are def not needed at all!

Without even talking Tinsley, why would Indy trade a guy in Rasho who's expiring that they (admittedly, we) could actually use for a guy in Eric Snow who's expiring, that won't play a single second on the court? Cleveland's the only team that could cut Snow's contract off the books, not Indy. It'd take a pick or young prospect to even make an offer. JJ Hickson would be too much value for Cleveland to give up, while a 2nd round pick would likely not be enough. To be honest, it'd probably have to be a heavily protected 1st round pick (like top 23-25 protected) to make a deal. Then, ask yourselves, is Rasho really worth a 1st round pick to you guys when you already have Ben Wallace off the bench? I think the answer likely is no.

Rasho is not the same as Z.. What in the world are you thinking?