Re-sign Anderson.
Use MLE on Charlie Vilanueva.
Trade Ben and Sasha for Vince Carter + filler.
Save rest of out money for 2010 to resign Lebron and another Allstar.
2008-2009 Lineup:
Mo/Gibson
West/Sasha/Kinsey
Lebron/Wally
Ben (for the most part)/Hickson/(later) Smith
Z/Andy
Possible 2009-2010 Lineup
Mo/Boobie
Carter/West
Lebron/Carter/filler
Charlie V/Jackson/Hickson
Z/Andy
Tell me that is not a mass improvement. Tell me it is not possible.
and just so everyone who loves West and Andy starting, let me throw out some season numbers.
West: 11.7 pts, 3.5 rbs, 3.2 assts.
compared to
Vince Carter: 20.8 pts, 5.1 rbs, 4.7 assts.
a little better...
and
Anderson Varejao: 8.6 pts, 7.2 rbs, 1.0 assts.
compared to
Charlie Villanueva: 16.2 pts, 6.7 rbs, 1.8 assts.
so we keep both anderson and west for the bench and just make our starters better....I think it works and gives us height and toughness. The two things that in my opinion lost us the Orlando series. The Re-sign Lebron and another guy and we are set for years.
Most realistic/best offseason move.
Moderator: ijspeelman
Most realistic/best offseason move.
- Amon_Ones88
- Sophomore
- Posts: 124
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Most realistic/best offseason move.
"Shaqtastic. 24 points." "Where'd you get so many Q's?" (With a stern scary look) "Don't worry about it..."
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
- L&H_05
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,569
- And1: 94
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
- Location: I love this game !
-
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
It's not that it's not possible, but it does nothing to address throwing the ball into the post and getting production from it..
Z needs to come off the bench and replaced with a defensive C, and the PF spot needs to addressed with a guy that has a low post game..
CV is a stretch-4 and doesn't address this.. Although, he is young and can shoot..
Z needs to come off the bench and replaced with a defensive C, and the PF spot needs to addressed with a guy that has a low post game..
CV is a stretch-4 and doesn't address this.. Although, he is young and can shoot..
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
- Gordon Bombay
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,227
- And1: 79
- Joined: Jan 09, 2007
- Location: Thanks Baron!
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
i dont want cv to be the end-all-be-all of the offseason...i dont really want cv starting, id love him off the bench tho
im definitely on board with l&h's defensive center and power forward with a post game philosophy
im definitely on board with l&h's defensive center and power forward with a post game philosophy
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
- Roger Murdock
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,459
- And1: 5,801
- Joined: Aug 12, 2008
-
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
I think CV is an awful idea.
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,398
- And1: 7,500
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
What PF is out there that can give us a post-game though? Boozer maybe...but that is probably a long-shot. I think Elton Brand might be out there to be had if Philly is struggling at the trade deadline. We could give them expirings and JJ for Brand and one of their other bad contracts, giving them max-cap space in 2010.
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
- Roger Murdock
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,459
- And1: 5,801
- Joined: Aug 12, 2008
-
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
DowJones wrote:What PF is out there that can give us a post-game though? Boozer maybe...but that is probably a long-shot. I think Elton Brand might be out there to be had if Philly is struggling at the trade deadline. We could give them expirings and JJ for Brand and one of their other bad contracts, giving them max-cap space in 2010.
Honestly if they are stuggling we could probably do a straight up ben for brand swap. His contract is bad enough already and he hasnt produced in a while.
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,398
- And1: 7,500
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
It depends on how bad they are struggling.
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
-
- Junior
- Posts: 320
- And1: 0
- Joined: Mar 16, 2009
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
This isn't addressing the issues in the post, but this still massively improves the team. Mo/Vince/LeBron is ridiculous. If that trio meshed well, along with adding in Villanueva, that is a scary offense even w/o a huge threat in the post. As close as the Orlando series was, Vince Carter and Charlie Villanueva would have tipped the balance, forget the post presence. This undoubtedly improves the team on paper on a high level.
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
- NashtyNas
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,261
- And1: 1,891
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
-
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
I think I would like a simple trade of future first for Josh Boone with the Nets, then pick up Mike Dunleavy + Troy Murphy for Ben + Sasha and draft Danny Green with our 30th.
Williams/West/Gibson
Dunleavy/Gibson/Kinsey
Lebron/Green/Kinsey
Murphy/Varejao/Hickson
Boone/Z/Varejao
That solves a lot of problems We get another legit scorer on the wing in Dunleavy, who is a very good volume scorer, average defender, and has the height & quickness to guard several positions. We also get a VERY good post scorer in Murphy, who is a great banger down low, and can also stretch the floor with the long bomb. He's an above average defender, and a very good rebounder. Not to mention, these guys are signed to decent deals, and would help very much in keeping Lebron around because they're good, young talent. We start Boone who's the young, fast, down-low banging, shot blocking, rebounding big we need and bring Z off the bench for scoring up front. Resign Varejao, and we don't even need to use our MLE or anything.
What does everyone think?
Now, you guys would wonder why Troy Murphy gets traded by Indiana. Well, they were thinking about selling the team because there in a lot of financial trouble, and we take 2 long term deals off them for 2 expiring that would only cost them 1.5mil to buy out Sasha + save another 14 when Ben retires. So they get 19mil instant savings. That is enough incentive for them to do this.
Williams/West/Gibson
Dunleavy/Gibson/Kinsey
Lebron/Green/Kinsey
Murphy/Varejao/Hickson
Boone/Z/Varejao
That solves a lot of problems We get another legit scorer on the wing in Dunleavy, who is a very good volume scorer, average defender, and has the height & quickness to guard several positions. We also get a VERY good post scorer in Murphy, who is a great banger down low, and can also stretch the floor with the long bomb. He's an above average defender, and a very good rebounder. Not to mention, these guys are signed to decent deals, and would help very much in keeping Lebron around because they're good, young talent. We start Boone who's the young, fast, down-low banging, shot blocking, rebounding big we need and bring Z off the bench for scoring up front. Resign Varejao, and we don't even need to use our MLE or anything.
What does everyone think?
Now, you guys would wonder why Troy Murphy gets traded by Indiana. Well, they were thinking about selling the team because there in a lot of financial trouble, and we take 2 long term deals off them for 2 expiring that would only cost them 1.5mil to buy out Sasha + save another 14 when Ben retires. So they get 19mil instant savings. That is enough incentive for them to do this.

The underappreciated greats:

Some seek fame cause they need validation, some say hating is confused admiration - Nasty, nasty Nas
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 3,783
- And1: 4
- Joined: Sep 20, 2002
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
Marc3287 wrote:This isn't addressing the issues in the post, but this still massively improves the team. Mo/Vince/LeBron is ridiculous. If that trio meshed well, along with adding in Villanueva, that is a scary offense even w/o a huge threat in the post. As close as the Orlando series was, Vince Carter and Charlie Villanueva would have tipped the balance, forget the post presence. This undoubtedly improves the team on paper on a high level.
True and even with the above scenario .... you still want/have to move Z. Z is quickly approaching bum status. He's living off LJ and whereever he get traded too he will look awful.
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
- PR07
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 14,180
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 25, 2003
- Location: PacersRule07
Re: Most realistic/best offseason move.
sd1306 wrote:That solves a lot of problems We get another legit scorer on the wing in Dunleavy, who is a very good volume scorer, average defender, and has the height & quickness to guard several positions. We also get a VERY good post scorer in Murphy, who is a great banger down low, and can also stretch the floor with the long bomb. He's an above average defender, and a very good rebounder. Not to mention, these guys are signed to decent deals, and would help very much in keeping Lebron around because they're good, young talent. We start Boone who's the young, fast, down-low banging, shot blocking, rebounding big we need and bring Z off the bench for scoring up front. Resign Varejao, and we don't even need to use our MLE or anything.
What does everyone think?
Now, you guys would wonder why Troy Murphy gets traded by Indiana. Well, they were thinking about selling the team because there in a lot of financial trouble, and we take 2 long term deals off them for 2 expiring that would only cost them 1.5mil to buy out Sasha + save another 14 when Ben retires
Have you ever seen Troy Murphy play? Banger and Troy Murphy to not go hand-in-hand. He also has virtually no low post game. He's primarily a three point shooter who can occasionally use his quickness and a quick jap step to drive to the rim. I'd also consider his defense just average.
As for the Pacers financial troubles, yes, they've had problems, but the team is going to be in Indy for a long time. I don't think the Pacers would be opposed to trading Murphy for expirings, draft picks, and young players; but that's just so they can rid themselves of his contract so they can pursue a free agent not because of ownership troubles.