ImageImageImage

BOOZER to CAVS

Moderator: ijspeelman

SportsBoy
Rookie
Posts: 1,248
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2002

BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#1 » by SportsBoy » Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:38 am

Cavs get Boozer.

Okla gets upgrade.

Utah dumps salary, gets young big.

Cavs send Boobie(4 Mil) to Okla for Atkins, livingston Unguaranteed contracts (4.4 Mil)

Cavs send Okla unguaranteed contract plus their own unguaranteed contracts

(Kinsey,jackson,williams) 2.1 Mil to Utah.

Cavs add JJ Hickson (1.4 Mil) and Wally in a S&T to balance the trade.

Utah NET:

6.5 - Unguaranteed contracts, Young big (JJ), Wally at 4mil for 1 year.
User avatar
infinite11285
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,111
And1: 26,859
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#2 » by infinite11285 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:58 am

:banghead:
User avatar
Gordon Bombay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,227
And1: 79
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
Location: Thanks Baron!

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#3 » by Gordon Bombay » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:15 am

i think we have the most resources to give utah the most salary relief but i dont know if we have the young pieces...and that whole mending fences with boozer and our ownership/fanbase
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,762
And1: 4,600
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#4 » by mg » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:19 am

No way the Cavs trade for Loozer.
Rise Against
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,184
And1: 73
Joined: May 21, 2006
 

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#5 » by Rise Against » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:27 am

That's not going to happen.
User avatar
BigDaddyPR
Analyst
Posts: 3,223
And1: 151
Joined: May 16, 2003
       

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#6 » by BigDaddyPR » Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:14 am

infinite11285 wrote::banghead:

My exact thoughts...... :roll:
Image
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#7 » by The Penguin » Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:35 am

Gordon Bombay wrote:i think we have the most resources to give utah the most salary relief but i dont know if we have the young pieces...and that whole mending fences with boozer and our ownership/fanbase


The most salary relief compared to who?

How is that true? Portland is still like $10 mil under the cap and the Pistons have about $3 mil in room.
Whateva
Pro Prospect
Posts: 933
And1: 91
Joined: Jun 09, 2006
Location: Spain

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#8 » by Whateva » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:23 pm

I want Boozer for the Cavs !
User avatar
Gordon Bombay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,227
And1: 79
Joined: Jan 09, 2007
Location: Thanks Baron!

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#9 » by Gordon Bombay » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:41 pm

Piston Prince wrote:
Gordon Bombay wrote:i think we have the most resources to give utah the most salary relief but i dont know if we have the young pieces...and that whole mending fences with boozer and our ownership/fanbase


The most salary relief compared to who?

How is that true? Portland is still like $10 mil under the cap and the Pistons have about $3 mil in room.


ah good call forget about them...they could give bayless and a trade exception

but the pistons dont have anything to offer utah besides prince and dumars already rejected that

i was thinking z's expiring contract and jj hickson in separate deals with the cavs giving utah 3 mil in compensation in each deal...that means they buy out z for 9 mil and only have to use 3 mil of their own money

just a hypothetical...no chance boozer ever plays with cleveland again
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#10 » by The Penguin » Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:19 pm

^^^
Pistons could offer Kwame-Maxiell-Walter Sharpe & shave $3 mil off Utah's cap number, assuming they don't want Boozer at all, (an offer similar to your Cavs offer) but you are right, I don't see him landing with either of us.


I do think Portland would make a bit of sense assuming Utah matches Millsap, they could offer the cap room and bring Boozer in for a year to see how it all shakes out before deciding if they want to resign him. I can't really see Utah trading him in the division though, especially not in a straight salary dump.

I've always thought Miami makes the most sense (something like D. Cook & Blount's expiring) given he's an expiring and wouldn't mess up their plans to have cap room, or to just resign him.
HomieOmey
Head Coach
Posts: 6,063
And1: 563
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: TO
Contact:

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#11 » by HomieOmey » Thu Jul 16, 2009 12:20 am

If the Cavs can get Boozer for cheap, I`d probably go for it. I understand the love loss, and such a move would mean the GM having to swallow his pride, but if LeBron would approve, you would have to go for it. It could have a similar effect to the Gasol trade for LA which eventually won LA a title and kept Kobe happy.
Image
TurboZ
Marc
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,267
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#12 » by Marc » Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:59 pm

When i 1st read the title i thought: wtf?, then i saw it was a nonsense trade idea...
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: BOOZER to CAVS 

Post#13 » by moocow007 » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:00 pm

Gordon Bombay wrote:
Piston Prince wrote:
Gordon Bombay wrote:i think we have the most resources to give utah the most salary relief but i dont know if we have the young pieces...and that whole mending fences with boozer and our ownership/fanbase


The most salary relief compared to who?

How is that true? Portland is still like $10 mil under the cap and the Pistons have about $3 mil in room.


ah good call forget about them...they could give bayless and a trade exception

but the pistons dont have anything to offer utah besides prince and dumars already rejected that

i was thinking z's expiring contract and jj hickson in separate deals with the cavs giving utah 3 mil in compensation in each deal...that means they buy out z for 9 mil and only have to use 3 mil of their own money

just a hypothetical...no chance boozer ever plays with cleveland again


Even if Cleveland buys out Z they still would have to pay for the luxury tax hit taking his salary would cost them since his salary would still count against the cap. I mean they could have just bought Boozer out if it was that easy. If it was that easy to avoid the tax teams around the NBA over the tax threshold would be buying out their deadweights in droves.

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers