Page 1 of 1

Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 4:21 pm
by 76ers76ers
Big Z + filler for Brand..............Any interest???

Sixers cut big Z.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 4:55 pm
by Gordon Bombay
no thanks

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 5:47 pm
by Niko23
Still hoping David West becomes available....

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 8:20 pm
by Benedict_Boozer
If Big Z came back after being bought out, sure why not.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 9:12 pm
by Triumph36
Benedict_Boozer wrote:If Big Z came back after being bought out, sure why not.
66M over the next four seasons, that's why not.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 11:13 pm
by rjgraca
The problem here is that Brand get's paid too much for what he has left in the tank. The 76er's would have to add a sweetener of some type to get the CAVs to bite.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 11:20 pm
by Chris Hansen
Id rather do Shaq for Dalembert + Brand + 1st.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 11:21 pm
by Kosar86
whats brand avg now, like 10 & 7? he is a shell of his former self

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sun Nov 8, 2009 2:16 am
by Benedict_Boozer
Triumph36 wrote:
Benedict_Boozer wrote:If Big Z came back after being bought out, sure why not.
66M over the next four seasons, that's why not.


Yeah good point.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Sun Nov 8, 2009 1:23 pm
by wowski
Benedict_Boozer wrote:If Big Z came back after being bought out, sure why not.

I really hope ferry and gilbert sees it your way if such an offer comes.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Mon Nov 9, 2009 12:31 am
by plainballing
Triumph36 wrote:
Benedict_Boozer wrote:If Big Z came back after being bought out, sure why not.
66M over the next four seasons, that's why not.


No way that 66 mil stay in Cavs All Mighty's books for 4 yrs...for a slowing declining people with injury problem?...You can do better than that!

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:11 am
by sh00n
Chris Hansen wrote:Id rather do Shaq for Dalembert + Brand + 1st.

:rofl:

Good luck getting that 1st.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:58 am
by bcortell
sh00n wrote:
Chris Hansen wrote:Id rather do Shaq for Dalembert + Brand + 1st.

:rofl:

Good luck getting that 1st.

I wouldn't even do it with the first. Brand has one of the top 5 worst contracts (probably closer to top 3) and Philly couldn't find anyone to take Dally off their hands. People have a terrible misconception on Dally if they think he is good (or even decent).

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:14 am
by eyejayem
Just random with the whole Wizards looking hopeless and stuff. If the Wizards wanted to get from out of their contracts and offered a deal around Arenas for Mo,Z,Hickson, 1st '10 and maybe '12, do we do it? I am just wondering at what point do they try to trade him and start over and at what point would we go to try and get Lebron some help?

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:32 am
by TheOUTLAW
I don't think Arenas is enough of an upgrade from Mo that he'd make up for the loss of Z, Hickson and 2 first. We are already incredibly short on big men and that trade gives away 2 without giving us any.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:30 am
by landphil
eyejayem wrote:Just random with the whole Wizards looking hopeless and stuff. If the Wizards wanted to get from out of their contracts and offered a deal around Arenas for Mo,Z,Hickson, 1st '10 and maybe '12, do we do it? I am just wondering at what point do they try to trade him and start over and at what point would we go to try and get Lebron some help?


Arenas is not worth 2 picks and 2 of our bigs and Mo...also when your thinking "will Arenas be a good fit on our team? Could he be a solid pg?" just go take a look at his quote about how he doesnt know whats going on with his team and why they are losing. Uh maybe it is because you are shooting 36% from the field, and have 5 assists a game to go along with your 5 turnovers a game. To be fair he is getting to the line though...and shooting 65% in his last 5 games.

So in summation, no gilbert arenas...maybe not even if it was just straight up mo for arenas, with his injury history and the drama he seems to bring up, dunno if it would be worth it.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:36 pm
by mcfly1204
I don't see anyone considering a trade involving Gilbert until he plays 70+ games this season. He would be amazing to watch playing off LeBron though.

Re: Big Z for Brand??

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:10 pm
by JustAwesome
I don't know if Arenas has the personality to where he would be willing to take a backseat to James. He needs to be the focal point. Otherwise, he's not going to be happy. If he's not happy, then he's not going to produce. I still see Arenas as someone that cares more about personal achievements than championships.