Page 1 of 4
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 2:55 am
by Niko23
Jamison went for 32 and 14 tonight. Why he is not a Cavalier yet is completely INSANE!!!!!!!!!
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 3:20 am
by Rise Against
The Sixers disappointed me... They got outscored 60-39 in the 2nd half, lost by 7.
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 4:25 am
by Gordon Bombay
we'll just hang onto jamison after this one is over...washington can leave with z's contract
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 4:59 am
by Benedict_Boozer
Niko23 wrote:Jamison went for 32 and 14 tonight. Why he is not a Cavalier yet is completely INSANE!!!!!!!!!
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 1:03 pm
by GenevieveJames
Exile23 wrote:The Sixers disappointed me... They got outscored 60-39 in the 2nd half, lost by 7.
hi are you a girl?
or is that a picture of a celeb, and are there other girls here?

Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 3:00 pm
by prekazi
GenevieveJames wrote:Exile23 wrote:The Sixers disappointed me... They got outscored 60-39 in the 2nd half, lost by 7.
hi are you a girl?
or is that a picture of a celeb, and are there other girls here?

Post of the year. Poster of the century.
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 4:10 pm
by mg
This one promises to be a real shootout
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:10 pm
by Niko23
Windy said in his beat blog today that Jamison is the "Perfect" fit for the Cavs. WAS will definitely look to make moves based on the old owner passing away. AJ is due 28 million over the next two years, but what Windy is saying that WAS does not want to deal him to us based on the bad blood between the franchises.
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:35 pm
by Benedict_Boozer
Niko23 wrote:Windy said in his beat blog today that Jamison is the "Perfect" fit for the Cavs. WAS will definitely look to make moves based on the old owner passing away. AJ is due 28 million over the next two years, but what Windy is saying that WAS does not want to deal him to us based on the bad blood between the franchises.
Yup. I don't see them doing it for that reason alone unless we are their ONLY option to unload his contract.
We saw it happen with MIL last year, they wanted to salary dump Jefferson but didn't want to do it with us because of the Mo deal...
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:36 pm
by Benedict_Boozer
GenevieveJames wrote:Exile23 wrote:The Sixers disappointed me... They got outscored 60-39 in the 2nd half, lost by 7.
hi are you a girl?
or is that a picture of a celeb, and are there other girls here?

Stalk much?

Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:44 pm
by mcfly1204
Benedict_Boozer wrote:Niko23 wrote:Windy said in his beat blog today that Jamison is the "Perfect" fit for the Cavs. WAS will definitely look to make moves based on the old owner passing away. AJ is due 28 million over the next two years, but what Windy is saying that WAS does not want to deal him to us based on the bad blood between the franchises.
Yup. I don't see them doing it for that reason alone unless we are their ONLY option to unload his contract.
We saw it happen with MIL last year, they wanted to salary dump Jefferson but didn't want to do it with us because of the Mo deal...
I realize Chicago probably wouldn't do it because of the decrease in capspace, but why don't they move Thomas and the ghost of Jerome James contract for Jamison? I would think a lineup of Rose/Salmons/Deng/Jamison/Noah would be pretty well balanced.
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:59 pm
by Niko23
mcfly1204 wrote:Benedict_Boozer wrote:Niko23 wrote:Windy said in his beat blog today that Jamison is the "Perfect" fit for the Cavs. WAS will definitely look to make moves based on the old owner passing away. AJ is due 28 million over the next two years, but what Windy is saying that WAS does not want to deal him to us based on the bad blood between the franchises.
Yup. I don't see them doing it for that reason alone unless we are their ONLY option to unload his contract.
We saw it happen with MIL last year, they wanted to salary dump Jefferson but didn't want to do it with us because of the Mo deal...
I realize Chicago probably wouldn't do it because of the decrease in capspace, but why don't they move Thomas and the ghost of Jerome James contract for Jamison? I would think a lineup of Rose/Salmons/Deng/Jamison/Noah would be pretty well balanced.
Because Bulls fans thing TT is the next Amare. At least that was last year......
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 9:00 pm
by prekazi
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 9:37 pm
by P'Oed
lol...well if you guys REALLY wanted to dog on us I guess now would be the perfect time, huh?

Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 9:43 pm
by Nirvana
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 10:50 pm
by Benedict_Boozer
This is actually bad. Now the Cavs will come out coasting like they always do against undermanned teams. With Arenas playing our guys might have had more motivation.
Luckily WAS is so undermanned/bad that we might be able to get away with it.
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 11:29 pm
by Rise Against
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 11:35 pm
by Rise Against
BTW, I also find it hilarious that today is Arena's birthday..
Re: Game 37 | Cavs vs Bullets | Jan 6th, 2010 | 7:00pm EST
Posted: Wed Jan 6, 2010 11:46 pm
by Wizardspride
Gordon Bombay wrote:we'll just hang onto jamison after this one is over...washington can leave with z's contract
You can have him.
For the right deal of course.
