ImageImage

Game 62: Milwaukee @ Texas; 6/9/07 @ 7:35

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#41 » by trwi7 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:07 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:I'd rather have the guy with more hits RBI, and far less strike outs. Because guys who strike out strand lots of runners in scoring position.


They have the same amount of RBI's since 2002 except Dunn has gotten the same number in 376 less at bats.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#42 » by trwi7 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:11 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:Lee's Career BA with risp is .298 with 600 RBI. Dunn's is .219 with .300 RBI. OH can I please have Dunn on my team.

Oh yeah, but Dunn does walk more with runners in scoring position, but that's because he's not to busy driving the runner's in.

Runners on and 2 outs. Lee .271 BA. Dunn .204. Dunn does not hit when his team needs him.


What does the bolded part mean? Would you rather have him swing at a ball and ground into a double play?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,361
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#43 » by Ill-yasova » Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:33 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



What does the bolded part mean? Would you rather have him swing at a ball and ground into a double play?


No. I'll bet you he gets at least on very hittable pitch per at bat. The difference is Lee uses that pitch to drive in the runners, Dunn does not.
User avatar
JoeWolfFan
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 07, 2006
Location: Neenah

 

Post#44 » by JoeWolfFan » Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:35 pm

Ok, maybe I stretched it a little with 100% of GM's would take Lee. The true number is probably more like 95%. After all, there are a few teams that are complete idiots out there.
It's a matter of opinion, and your opinion is wrong.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#45 » by trwi7 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 6:36 pm

Okay fair enough but how many at bats have each had with RISP in their careers?

And why are we debating their offense (yes I know my fault for starting it) let's debate their defense. Who would you rather have play LF, Lee or Dunn? :lol:
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,361
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#46 » by Ill-yasova » Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:04 pm

trwi7 wrote:Okay fair enough but how many at bats have each had with RISP in their careers?

And why are we debating their offense (yes I know my fault for starting it) let's debate their defense. Who would you rather have play LF, Lee or Dunn? :lol:

I would rather have you in left field than Lee :wink: . That said I would rather have Gwynn in the outfield than Gross.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#47 » by WEFFPIM » Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:11 pm

Man, the make-up sex you two will have should be interesting
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,361
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#48 » by Ill-yasova » Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:06 pm

willeatfire4playoffsinmil wrote:Man, the make-up sex you two will have should be interesting

:beer:
No sex, just a couple of beers.
User avatar
JoeWolfFan
Junior
Posts: 470
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 07, 2006
Location: Neenah

 

Post#49 » by JoeWolfFan » Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:18 pm

You can't even debate their defense because they are both really bad. Each of those guys is a DH playing left field.
It's a matter of opinion, and your opinion is wrong.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#50 » by trwi7 » Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:17 am

willeatfire4playoffsinmil wrote:Man, the make-up sex you two will have should be interesting


Image
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Milwaukee Brewers