ImageImage

MUST WIN : WILL WIN

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,337
And1: 4,150
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#21 » by BUCKnation » Sun Sep 7, 2014 12:21 am

...and then Tavares. Good lord.
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,335
And1: 29,278
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
       

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#22 » by blazza18 » Sun Sep 7, 2014 12:21 am

Goddammit Lohse you pos.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#23 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 12:39 am

Well that sucks
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#24 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 12:58 am

Seriously? ?? WTF
User avatar
BigDee
RealGM
Posts: 16,171
And1: 1,380
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Location: Wisconsin
     

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#25 » by BigDee » Sun Sep 7, 2014 12:59 am

Ugh
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,335
And1: 29,278
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
       

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#26 » by blazza18 » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:00 am

Be nice if Braun came up in a big spot and actually did something.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#27 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:00 am

Oh **** off. Keep pissing away chances
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#28 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:02 am

blazza18 wrote:Be nice if Braun came up in a big spot and actually did something.

To be fair he did in the first inning.

And also, even with his thumb injury and playing **** he's still better than Logan Schafer
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,337
And1: 4,150
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#29 » by BUCKnation » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:03 am

This guy is handing runners on a silver platter and we can't do s*** with them.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#30 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:13 am

Lol check swing double for Luc
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#31 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:18 am

Well done O
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#32 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:23 am

Sigh it really feels like we'll come up short tonight and not due to lack of opportunities
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,337
And1: 4,150
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#33 » by BUCKnation » Sun Sep 7, 2014 1:30 am

NeedsMoreCheese wrote:Sigh it really feels like we'll come up short tonight and not due to lack of opportunities

We can't do anything with 2 outs.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#34 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 2:13 am

Well done Rickie, now make it mean something tonight boys
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN  

Post#35 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sun Sep 7, 2014 2:16 am

Sucks that the games we've lost this series we had a ton of chances. What a waste
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,675
And1: 27,265
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#36 » by trwi7 » Sun Sep 7, 2014 2:34 am

Lohse is crap.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
StillABucksFan
Sophomore
Posts: 149
And1: 54
Joined: Jan 11, 2014

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#37 » by StillABucksFan » Sun Sep 7, 2014 4:05 am

I think Lohse got overworked earlier in the season, and most of the bullpen guys who didn't already suck.
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 13,944
And1: 7,316
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#38 » by coolhandluke121 » Sun Sep 7, 2014 12:54 pm

I think Lohse is just Lohse. His career ERA+ is 98, but for some reason people here act like he's a stud. He's been good for Milwaukee and his experience has helped him become a better pitcher, but he's still Kyle Lohse and 2 good years does not trump 10 mediocre ones.

If it seems like I'm annoyed, it's because I have suggested trading Lohse and Gallardo on several occasions and people acted like the idea was ridiculous. But it was based on what you could reasonably expect them to do the rest of the season and on what their trade value was, not based on what they did in the first 3 months of the season. If you expected them to hold their ERAs around 3 all year, I think you were being a bit delusional.

For once, let some other team be left holding the bag on a player that you're holding on to for too long. Every time your refuse to trade a solid-but-unspectacular veteran for a good prospect, that's just as bad as trading a good prospect for a veteran in my book. The net result is the same.

And this team in general has shown an inability to realistically assess its overall talent level. Every single year, it's like "we can make the playoffs if everything goes right" but it's only once in a blue moon that everything does. It happened in 2011, but we do we have to show for 10 years of "win now" other than that? We had more valuable veterans than the Cubs and could have easily reloaded even more impressively than they did if Mark A. wasn't so hyper-competitive.

Ditto Melvin. The larger issue with him is that he doesn't seem to value defense or platoons at all, and has a tendency to build ridiculously imbalanced lineups. RR doesn't seem to have a clue about fundamentals. The base-running mistakes they make are inexcusable and are sufficient grounds in and of themselves for firing him. I'm not even sure I like this team half the time. I'd like them more if they were 10 games under .500 but were building a more promising future, one where you can still a playoff contender even if a few guys get hurt and you don't have a bunch of different guys having career years.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.
User avatar
BuckFan25226
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,707
And1: 1,091
Joined: Jan 30, 2006
Location: Wauwatosa, WI

Re: MUST WIN : WILL WIN 

Post#39 » by BuckFan25226 » Sun Sep 7, 2014 2:45 pm

coolhandluke121 wrote:I think Lohse is just Lohse. His career ERA+ is 98, but for some reason people here act like he's a stud. He's been good for Milwaukee and his experience has helped him become a better pitcher, but he's still Kyle Lohse and 2 good years does not trump 10 mediocre ones.

If it seems like I'm annoyed, it's because I have suggested trading Lohse and Gallardo on several occasions and people acted like the idea was ridiculous. But it was based on what you could reasonably expect them to do the rest of the season and on what their trade value was, not based on what they did in the first 3 months of the season. If you expected them to hold their ERAs around 3 all year, I think you were being a bit delusional.

For once, let some other team be left holding the bag on a player that you're holding on to for too long. Every time your refuse to trade a solid-but-unspectacular veteran for a good prospect, that's just as bad as trading a good prospect for a veteran in my book. The net result is the same.

And this team in general has shown an inability to realistically assess its overall talent level. Every single year, it's like "we can make the playoffs if everything goes right" but it's only once in a blue moon that everything does. It happened in 2011, but we do we have to show for 10 years of "win now" other than that? We had more valuable veterans than the Cubs and could have easily reloaded even more impressively than they did if Mark A. wasn't so hyper-competitive.

Ditto Melvin. The larger issue with him is that he doesn't seem to value defense or platoons at all, and has a tendency to build ridiculously imbalanced lineups. RR doesn't seem to have a clue about fundamentals. The base-running mistakes they make are inexcusable and are sufficient grounds in and of themselves for firing him. I'm not even sure I like this team half the time. I'd like them more if they were 10 games under .500 but were building a more promising future, one where you can still a playoff contender even if a few guys get hurt and you don't have a bunch of different guys having career years.



This is why the Cardinals never offered him multiple years. They offered him 1 year, 10 million I believe. They knew he wouldn't be able to sustain what he did in 11' and 12', which were by far the 2 best years of his career under the tutelage of Dave Duncan. He also bottoms out in the postseason. He is a very good middle to back end guy of a good rotation, but he is anything but a stopper. To his credit though, I can't think of a pitcher improving so much as a starter this late in their career. Even as bad as he's been lately, he's still had a very good year.
"didnt you watch the game with the raptors?bucks is also a playoff team ,they have enough ability to find wins from dalas and utach,
blow jazzs bitches and mavericks bitches out !"

- yiyiyi

Return to Milwaukee Brewers